Silver Price Forecast: XAG/USD falls to near $66.50 as Fed signals further rate hikes Silver price (XAG/USD) depreciates after registering gains the previous day, trading around $66.50 per troy ounce during Asian hours on Wednesday. Non-yielding Silver faces challenges due to the Federal Reserve's hawkish monetary policy... Read More👈

Channel
FXStreet Forex News
@fxstreetforex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
103,630subscribers
-1,166 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001510625232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @forexnews @fxstreetforex |
| Description | Discover the world of Forex! We provide reliable news, actionable analysis, a timely economic calendar, and expert mentoring to help you make informed trading decisions. T&C: https://www.fxstreet.com/info/terms-conditions |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 67 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fxstreetforex |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 103,630 | -22 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 103,652 | -86 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 103,738 | +18 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 103,720 | -74 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 103,794 | -29 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 103,823 | -49 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 103,872 | -24 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 103,896 | -61 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 103,957 | +28 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 103,929 | -62 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 103,991 | -26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 104,017 | -109 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 104,126 | -41 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 104,167 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 104,175 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 104,186 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:14 | 104,210 | -33 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:08 | 104,243 | -29 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:14 | 104,272 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 104,290 | first reading |
Engagement
1,479 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.475%
- avg views ÷ 103,630 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 492
- 943 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.26%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 943
- of 1,479 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 274 of 943 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,479 (6 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 464,152 |
| Reactions total | 490 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 02:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈83,400
- Videos
- ≈53
- Links
- ≈203,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 47s
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
569 reactions across 270 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 396 | 69.6% | |
| ✍ | 55 | 9.67% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 3.51% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 2.64% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 2.46% | |
| 👀 | 14 | 2.46% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 1.41% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 1.23% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 1.05% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 0.879% | |
| 🥱 | 5 | 0.879% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 0.703% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 0.703% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.527% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.527% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.527% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.176% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.176% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.176% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 296 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 569 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ZN Elliott Wave analysis: Has the next bearish move started? Wave count and key levels [Video] Short answer: Ten Year Notes (ZN) has extended its bearish sequence after breaking below the October 2023 low, signaling that the next leg lower is... Read More👈
Your trading edge starts locally📌 FXStreet’s Broker List highlights the safest brokers near you. ✔️Save time ✔️ Skip the risky experiments ✔️ Trade with peace of mind Explore the FXStreet broker list now and see your local top picks😉: https://fxstreet.page.link/idqrhFPg7NQSzu8A8
Japanese Yen softens on BoJ's lack of hawkish guidance, potential intervention eyed The USD/JPY pair gathers strength to around 157.60 during the early Asian trading hours on Wednesday. The Japanese Yen (JPY) extends the decline due to a lack of explicitly hawkish guidance from the Bank of Japan (BoJ) after the rate hike last... Read More👈
Canadian Dollar seems vulnerable as Iran diplomacy hopes weigh on oil prices The USD/CAD pair attracts buyers for the third straight day and trades around the 1.4070-1.4075 area during the Asian session on Wednesday, near its highest level since July 29, touched the previous... Read More👈
Australian Dollar remains under pressure as PMI slows AUD/USD loses ground for the third consecutive day, trading around 0.7110 during Asian hours on... Read More👈
Euro weakens below 1.1450 on hawkish Fed signals, German political risks The EUR/USD pair loses ground to near 1.1445 during the early Asian trading hours on Wednesday. The US Dollar (USD) strengthens against the Euro (EUR) on the hawkish stance of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) and the prospect of further interest rate... Read More👈
PBOC sets USD/CNY reference rate at 6.7468 vs. 6.7459 previous On Wednesday, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) sets the USD/CNY central rate for the trading session ahead at 6.7468 compared to the previous day's fix of 6.7459 and 6.6971 Reuters... Read More👈
British Pound hangs near late July lows vs USD; looks to UK/US PMIs for fresh impetus The GBP/USD pair struggles to build on the previous day's modest bounce from the 1.3320 area, or its lowest since July 29, and sticks to a negative bias for the third straight day on... Read More👈
US Special Envoy Witkoff says mediators completed round of US-Iran talks United States (US) Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, said the US held "lengthy" indirect talks with the Iranian delegation via mediators on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), Reuters reported on... Read More👈
WTI slumps to near $89.00 as markets weigh Trump’s UN speech West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the US crude oil benchmark, is trading around $89.00 during the early Asian trading hours on Wednesday. WTI falls after US President Donald Trump said the United States (US) held hours-long talks with... Read More👈
❤1🐳1
Behind every Orange Juice edition, there’s a real expert. 🍊 Daily market insights written by professionals who know what matters to traders. Concise, practical, and easy to read. Always free. Already trusted by 38,000+ traders worldwide.🌍 Join them now and make Orange Juice part of your trading strategy. https://fxstreet.page.link/n4pGTEJeU5DkELYW9
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,479 posts we hold for @fxstreetforex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ForexFactoryCalendar · 15,140#1
@Forex_LiveStream · 103,318#2
@fxstreetcrypto · 10,790#3
@Forex · 128,271#4
@octa_analytics · 75,635#5
@fbsanalytics · 86,876#6
@mmsignalsfx · 105,026#7
@SangamAgarwalFX · 8,001#8
@fxforextech974ptd · 4,249#9
@goldsnipers11 · 194,929#10
@EasyForexPips · 243,380#11
@fxstreetforexindonesia · 2,295#12
@ForexCalendar · 5,383#13
@tradingecon · 5,322#14
@Srosh_signals · 10,474#15
@investinglivenews · 5,305#16
@RLindaTrade · 27,097#17
@forexgoldbox12333 · 15,641#18
@financialnews · 6,553#19
@mohammadarafatofficial · 6,763#20
@alexsetandforget · 213,024#21
@TradingPuzzles · 14,950#22
@tradewithAKK · 6,070#23
@VasilyTrading · 42,679#24
@Liquidity_Trading · 48,517#25
@withtradeLzbzjxudhd11 · 33,272#26
@BrianTradingForex · 47,524#27
@WinDoubleGold188 · 5,117#28
@UnitedSignalsFX · 25,850#29
@cointelegraph · 334,771#30
@tradewithakashgarg · 31,724#31
@GFR_ANALYSIS · 21,220#32
@fastplanetnews · 42,132#33
@elliottwavecount · 199,880#34
@Advance3882 · 4#35
@signalsproviderfx · 17,255#36
@tradehub_fx · 8,659#37
@ankitjainsofficial · 6,321#38
@bktraderschannel · 2,963#39
@signalsfc · 32,605#40
@kabhifx · 8,217#41
@lingridchannel · 21,130#42
@anabelsignals · 32,300#43
@top_tradingsignals · 32,632#44
@msbfxelite · 23,689#45
@ForexSalaryConnect · 5,804#46
@OctainIndia · 1,814#47
@forexanalysis · 114,419#48
@bengoldtrader · 354,398#49
@schooloftrades · 153,863#50
@SM_News_24h · 42,499#51
@forexero · 77,229#52
@wells_crypto · 69,660#53
@Tradelikemalikagroup · 113,946#54
@goldtradersunny · 112,818#55
@jamesgoldmaster · 131,294#56
@fxstreetforexspanish · 2,566#57
@WatcherGuru · 627,715#58
@Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips · 71,155#59
@Gold_Crypto_News · 14,580#60
@ForexBreakingNews · 367,847#61
@tradewithAnupZiddi · 6,633#62
@breakingmarketnews · 4,708#63
@premiumvvip333 · 2,599#64
@tradersparadise · 250,026#65
@bloomberg · 175,725#66
@tecnicalkewatji · 13,056#67
@market_demon · 19,135#68
@A1TradingFXAnalysis · 44,155#69
@TURBOtradersInternationals · 118,665#70
@mql5dev · 557,147#71
@wolffxvip · 24,011#72
@Novascalperchannel · 24,802#73
@livepriceaction · 5,024#74
@forexproguru · 2,579#75
@KingOfForexProOfficial · 28,502#76
@ewstrategy · 61,266#77
@RioTraders · 79,172#78
@firepipsignals · 237,260#79
@supplydemandforextrading · 4,709#80
@goldprotradertame · 43,659#81
@whh521gold · 2,316#82
@crypto_wolf_com · 25,574#83
@Tradingpromoney · 17,669#84
@thelimitlessfx · 33,592#85
@elliotwavetommy · 54,945#86
@BookmapAtif · 41,185#87
@intradaydotmy · 45,660#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tradingwithrayner · 76,060
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@Forex_LiveStream · 103,318
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@octa_analytics · 75,635
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@fbsanalytics · 86,876
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
@SM_News_24h · 42,499
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
@Forex · 128,271
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 August 2026
@Forex_Trading_Quotex_Signals · 68,669
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026
@TMAbyArty · 25,044
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@Forex_Signals_Level_Up · 32,595
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@priceactionforexltd · 40,110
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@fastplanetnews · 42,132
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
@mql5dev · 557,147
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
@calendarsignal · 21,733
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@alexsetandforget · 213,024
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@Forex_Signals_PIPs_Signal_Fx · 24,913
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
@forex_factory_signals1 · 26,312
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 12 September 2026
@VasilyTrading · 42,679
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
@FundedNextOfficialCommunity · 61,364
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@metatrader_hints · 36,118
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 3 September 2026
@forexdochtc2 · 34,817
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@top_tradingsignals · 32,632
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@mmsignalsfx · 105,026
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@theforexbulls · 106,555
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@RLindaTrade · 27,097
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 76 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FXStreet Forex News” (@fxstreetforex), 103,630 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fxstreetforex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.