Channel
@wolffxvip
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,011subscribers
-863 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001197758360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wolffxvip |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wolffxvip |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 24,011 | -46 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 24,057 | -31 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 24,088 | -44 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 24,132 | -41 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 24,173 | -61 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 24,234 | -54 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 24,288 | -34 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 24,322 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:24 | 24,353 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 24,379 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 24,397 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 24,418 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 24,435 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 24,451 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 24,462 | -23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 24,485 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 24,499 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 24,521 | -29 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 24,550 | -20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 24,570 | first reading |
78 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (4 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 10,978 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
You can trade from anywhere with this indicator! With this system you get everything you need! If you want it to trade automatically for you, you can install the robot and if you want to trade manually you can use the indicator! And if you want all my trades to be copied directly from my account you can join my Copy Trader here: https://pmxrobot.com/pages/copytraderfx
Remember when you buy my trading robot you also get my Tradingview indicator so you can trade anywhere from your phone! Start growing your account today 👉 https://pmxrobot.com
Safe to say people who joined the Challenge had a great start! If you want me to grow your account from $100 to $5 I will give you 15 more hours to join! Join here: https://pmxrobot.com/pages/challenge
BOOM 100 pips more ✅✅ If you want to get all trades get my system here: https://pmxrobot.com
Both trades running in profit ✅✅ If you want my system to do everything for you get it here: https://pmxrobot.com
I think a lot of people overcomplicate trading. They spend hours looking for the perfect entry, jumping between indicators, watching charts all day, and still end up missing opportunities. That was one of the main reasons I created PipsMaster X Because I wanted something that could follow the strategy with zero hesitation, zero emotions, and zero second-guessing. The market doesn't care if you're at work, spendin…
Challenge will start in a few hours! I will grow your account from $100 to $5k! Don’t miss this opportunity if you want to see testimonials about my system you can see them here: https://t.me/PipsMasterTestimonials Join the challenge before it begins 👉 https://pmxrobot.com/pages/challenge
I have only 1 spot remaining! Don’t regret it and join now 👉 https://pmxrobot.com/pages/challenge
Link is live you can join NOW here: https://pmxrobot.com/pages/trading-challenge
30 more minutes until the link unlocks! If you don't join you will regret it when I send the profit screenshots this week! The 10 people that join will get my complete trading system plus their account directly connected to mine, so all trades that open in my account will be opened automatically into your account! I will do all the setup for you so you don't need to worry about anything! Check the timer here: htt…
🚨 I’M PUTTING PMX 3.7 TO THE ULTIMATE TEST 🚨 STARTING BALANCE: $100 TARGET: $5,000 TIME LIMIT: 30 DAYS I’m letting ONLY 10 PEOPLE copy every eligible trade from the challenge directly into their own trading accounts. You won’t need to install or configure everything alone. ✅ You use your own account ✅ I personally handle the setup ✅ Trades are copied automatically ✅ No waiting for Telegram signals ✅ No manual ent…
I received so many messages I decided to extend the offer 3 more hours to give a chance to everyone! I guarantee this will be the best system you will ever use and that is why if you don’t make a profit in 30 days I will give you your money back! Get offer: https://pmxrobot.com/pages/friday-30
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @wolffxvip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 71 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wolf Fx VIP” (@wolffxvip), 24,011 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wolffxvip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.