TP 1 & 2 are BOTH hit ✅ + 90 pips profit secured 🔥🔥🔥 Move your SL back to entry.
❤3🔥2👍1👏1💯1😇1🙏1🆒1

Channel
@nasgold1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
96,614subscribers
+36,926 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001562801233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nasgold1 |
| Description | 🔹Nasdaq Gold 🔹Expert in Forex Market. 🔹High Accurate Forex Signals. 🔹Researching Team is Here. 🔹Weekly 800+ Indices/Forex pips. T.me/NASDAQELIT This group chat is for the purpose of knowledge enrichment to Traders. Will Never Message you First! |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nasgold1 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 96,614 | -1,325 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 97,939 | -572 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 98,511 | -1,251 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 99,762 | -1,042 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 100,804 | -804 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:06 | 101,608 | -843 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 102,451 | -427 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 102,878 | -474 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 103,352 | -995 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 104,347 | -410 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 104,757 | -1,099 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 105,856 | -450 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:17 | 106,306 | -940 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 107,246 | -2,156 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 109,402 | -2,820 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 112,222 | -2,824 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 115,046 | +30,762 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 84,284 | +1,289 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 82,995 | -277 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 83,272 | first reading |
425 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 425 (4 August 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 986,760 |
| Reactions total | 15,788 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Oct 2026, 14:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68,307 reactions across 422 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10,042 | 14.7% | |
| ❤ | 9,986 | 14.6% | |
| 👍 | 9,702 | 14.2% | |
| 🥰 | 8,590 | 12.6% | |
| 🎉 | 8,489 | 12.4% | |
| 👏 | 4,567 | 6.69% | |
| 😍 | 4,057 | 5.94% | |
| 🤩 | 3,998 | 5.85% | |
| 💯 | 3,963 | 5.80% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3,736 | 5.47% | |
| 🤝 | 266 | 0.389% | |
| 🙏 | 247 | 0.362% | |
| 🆒 | 199 | 0.291% | |
| 👌 | 156 | 0.228% | |
| 🤯 | 124 | 0.182% | |
| 😇 | 110 | 0.161% | |
| 🏆 | 25 | 0.037% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 0.012% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.01% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.009% | |
| 12 further kinds | 29 | 0.042% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 422 of the 425 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68,307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 425 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nasgold1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 425 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
TP 1 & 2 are BOTH hit ✅ + 90 pips profit secured 🔥🔥🔥 Move your SL back to entry.
❤3🔥2👍1👏1💯1😇1🙏1🆒1
XAUUSD SELL 4032 TP 1 4028 TP 2 4027 TP 3 4000 SL @ 4050 Trade accordingly and with proper risk management strategy.
🔥3👍2❤1👏1💯1🤝1🥰1🙏1
High impact US news in the next 2 hours!🔔
🔥4❤2👍1👏1🤝1🥰1🙏1🆒1
80 pips from xauusd and us30
❤3🔥2👍1👏1💯1🤝1🥰1😇1
You’re really insane!!! The trade in the open group was unbelievably! Looking so much forward to get finally in the VIP group 👍😍
🔥3❤1👍1👏1🤝1🤩1🙏1🆒1
✅ XAU/USD Update Price has now reached the second target zone around 4025.00. The move continues to respect the original bullish structure. 📍Next key area: 4035.00 Risk management remains important as price can react around these zones.
👍2🔥2❤1👌1💯1🤝1🥰1😇1
Nasdaq / Gold Signals pinned a photo
✅ XAU/USD Update Price has now reached the first target zone around 4018.00. The move continues to respect the original bullish structure. 📍Next key area: 4025.00 Risk management remains important as price can react around these zones.
🔥3❤2🏆1👍1👏1🤝1🙏1🆒1
📣XAU/USD📣 Direction: BUY Entry Price: 4015.00 TP1 4018.00 TP2 4025.00 TP3 4035.00 SL 3996.00
❤3🔥2👍1👏1💯1🤝1🙏1🆒1
US30 CLOSE HALF 161+ PIPS PROFIT ✅✅ MOVE SL TO ENTRY
🔥3❤2👍1👏1💯1🤝1🥰1😇1
US30 SELL 52340.1 SL: 52450.1 TP: 52040.1
👍3❤2👌1👏1💯1🔥1😇1🙏1
USOIL CLOSE HALF 131+ PIPS PROFIT ✅✅ MOVE SL TO ENTRY
🔥3👏2❤1👌1👍1🤝1🥰1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 425 posts we hold for @nasgold1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What are we trading today?
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 425 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nasdaq / Gold Signals” (@nasgold1), 96,614 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasgold1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.