Channel
🎈Nova Scalper Channel™.🎈
@Novascalperchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,597subscribers
+2,830 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001895595355 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Novascalperchannel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Novascalperchannel |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 26,597 | +2,857 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 23,740 | -1,062 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 24,802 | -465 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 25,267 | -1,225 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 26,492 | -263 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 26,755 | +3,445 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 23,310 | -4,550 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 27,860 | +4,122 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 23,738 | -321 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 24,059 | -3,266 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 27,325 | -61 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 27,386 | -560 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 27,946 | +7,167 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 20,779 | -32 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 20,811 | -58 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 20,869 | -1,090 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 21,959 | -2,816 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 24,775 | -83 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 24,858 | -1,265 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 26,123 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 16 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BrianTradingForex · 47,697#1
@RLindaTrade · 27,263#2
@KOTradingGold · 4,313#3
@Tradingpromoney · 17,884#4
@winrateforexgold · 3,493#5
@GoldView_FX · 13,673#6
@Packerchanneltrading · 14,853#7
@tradewithAnupZiddi · 6,576#8
@anabelsignals · 32,700#9
@fxwarriorchannel · 2,528#10
@TradingPuzzles · 14,946#11
@UnitedSignalsFX · 26,265#12
@HellenaSignals · 5,860#13
@signalsfc · 32,872#14
@signalsproviderfx · 17,465#15
@bengoldtrader · 354,145#16
@elitetrading_signals · 16,753#17
@goldsnipers11 · 194,361#18
@MGA_Alchemist · 1,392#19
@tommyxau · 3,732#20
@prosignalsfxx · 19,643#21
@top_tradingsignals · 32,494#22
@haristarranalysis · 716#23
@GOLDSNNPER786 · 53,621#24
@ForexFundamentalsLab · 2,278#25
@besttradingForrex · 18,061#26
@Elena_Mayi · 406#27
@WalterTFSignal · 1,126#28
@EasyForexPips · 241,960#29
@forexanalysis · 114,425#30
@degramchannel · 8,242#31
@jamesgoldmaster · 129,802#32
@Goldsignal32 · 1,355#33
@sphyntrading · 12,688#34
@Analysis_signal_sharing · 428#35
@JungoldAnalyst · 4,720#36
@Kohinoorfreevipgoldforexsignals · 355#37
@schooloftrades · 154,648#38
@HighPipsFX · 4,106#39
@XAUUSD_vip_group1 · 173#40
@d0nfx · 5,501#41
@fastplanetnews · 41,625#42
@fxforextech974ptd · 4,268#43
@US30Marketview · 13,813#44
@mmsignalsfx · 104,052#45
@WinDoubleGold188 · 5,102#46
@fxpipspredators007 · 41,601#47
@GFR_ANALYSIS · 21,172#48
@BestForexSignals_FREEchannel · 22,438#49
@Forex · 126,243#50
@KingOfForexProOfficial · 3,014#51
@GoldVipsignals51 · 1,472#52
@peroinvesting · 9,939#53
@Actuary00group · 3,998#54
@lingridchannel · 21,102#55
@PriceAction_ICT · 10,900#56
@KnightsofGold · 8,901#57
@kabhifx · 8,084#58
@VasilyTrading · 42,687#59
@Srosh_signals · 10,665#60
@intradaytradingsignals · 6,719#61
@melikatrader94 · 3,862#62
@FX_Quality · 1,539#63
@wells_crypto · 68,903#64
@fxstreetforex · 103,181#65
@TheAcetrading · 2,403#66
@SangamAgarwalFX · 7,972#67
@octa_analytics · 75,353#68
@goldtradersunny · 109,321#69
@SM_News_24h · 43,170#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BrianTradingForex · 47,697
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@RLindaTrade · 27,263
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
@signalsfc · 32,872
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@TaniaTradingAcademy · 43,859
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
@anabelsignals · 32,700
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@UnitedSignalsFX · 26,265
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
@top_tradingsignals · 32,494
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@prosignalsfxx · 19,643
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
@fastplanetnews · 41,625
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
@NPFXSignals · 18,834
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
@TradingNoah_Vip · 87,643
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
@BestForexSignals_FREEchannel · 22,438
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 September 2026
@Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips · 70,583
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
@fbsanalytics · 86,566
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
@lingridchannel · 21,102
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@SM_News_24h · 43,170
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
@xtremetradersignals · 19,209
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
@RioTradersStocks · 24,712
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
@VasilyTrading · 42,687
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
@forexgdpfree · 19,366
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 October 2026
@fxstreetforex · 103,181
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎈Nova Scalper Channel™.🎈” (@Novascalperchannel), 26,597 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Novascalperchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.