Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramβs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts β open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp β in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
βPublished firstβ means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorβs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @forextimes_en. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channelβs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable β 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times β 60%, no better than a coin flip β because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelβs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying β a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story β and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 5,914β6,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 06:18
5,924
-27
3 Sept 2026, 13:38
5,951
-29
31 Aug 2026, 06:23
5,980
-5
27 Aug 2026, 22:45
5,985
-4
24 Aug 2026, 19:06
5,989
+6
21 Aug 2026, 11:16
5,983
-8
18 Aug 2026, 10:43
5,991
+13
15 Aug 2026, 02:14
5,978
-10
11 Aug 2026, 10:58
5,988
-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:36
5,992
-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:16
5,994
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
482 reactions across 29 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
177
36.7%
π₯
98
20.3%
π
96
19.9%
β‘
46
9.54%
β€βπ₯
29
6.02%
π₯°
8
1.66%
π€
7
1.45%
π―
5
1.04%
π
5
1.04%
π
4
0.83%
π
3
0.622%
πΎ
2
0.415%
π
2
0.415%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 482 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π August 11, 2026π
βββββββββ
π΅ All macroeconomic data β‘οΈ Link
βββββββββ
π Calendar for today
π¦πΊ RBA Interest Rate Decision - 04:30 UTC
πΊπΈ ADP Employment Change Weekly - 12:15 UTC
πΊπΈ Existing Home Sales - 14:00 UTC
βββββββββ
#EconomicCalendar
π² Colleagues, outlook on the likely medium-term direction for π’ WTI π’
βοΈMarket entry is strictly based on technical analysis patterns!!!
βββββββββ
βοΈUnlock powerful market patterns
Join ForexTimes now!!!
βββββββββ
β‘οΈ JOIN VIP COMMUNITY β¬ οΈ
βββββββββ
VIP ForexTimes is:
β‘οΈTrading signals.
β‘οΈTrading ideas based on Ralph Elliott's market wave structure.
β‘οΈStrategic target levels (Report) - are levels that the priceβ¦
β‘οΈ Dear colleagues,
a new TRADING SIGNAL for π¦πΊAUDUSDπ¦πΊ has been published in the ForexTimes VIP community.
βββββββββ
π€RR 1:3.2βΌοΈ
π€What is the SL level?
π€What is the TP level?
π₯ You will find answers to these and other questions in the ForexTimes VIP community!!!
βββββββββ
VIP ForexTimes is:
β‘οΈTrading signals.
β‘οΈTrading ideas based on Ralph Elliott's market wave structure.
β‘οΈStrategic target levels (Report) - are levβ¦
#Oil
π’Oil (4H): LONG toward the unfilled gap area at 87.59.
βββββββββ
π WTI forecast π
βββββββββ
β‘οΈ OIL continues to develop within a complex corrective structure. According to the current wave count, the larger wave "W" has already been completed, while the next part of the correction, wave "X", is now unfolding.
Within wave "X", the price is developing wave "B" of the higher degree. However, the intermediate beariβ¦
βββββββββ
Dear colleagues,
the economic calendar will not be published today. There are no major news releases or key statistical data expected that could impact currency exchange rates or asset prices.
βββββββββ
π₯ Weekly Market Review from Forex TimesβΌοΈ
βββββββββ
Our head trader, "Master Den" just shared his latest market review for the week ahead.
π£ Colleagues, unfortunately, YouTube didn't allow voice translation today. So, today we're just using subtitles.
Please click in the video in the lower right corner: "Settings" then "Subtitles" then select "English".
βββββββββ
π² https://youtu.be/nbMQsEHVUdM
βββββββββ
"And may theβ¦
π² Join the ForexTimes VIP Community!
βββββββββ
Want to trade with confidence and make consistent profits in the market?
Get access to professional analytics with zero fluff.
βWhat's inside the VIP channel:
βΊAccurate trading signals (Forex, Gold, WTI).
βΊSpecific Entry, Stop Loss, and Take Profit levels.
βΊClear forecasts based on comprehensive analysis.
βWhy our forecasts work:
Our analytics track the moves of majorβ¦
π² Colleagues, for π¦πΊ AUDUSD π¦πΊ, the primary scenario is a price decline as part of an "ABC" correction toward the 38.2% Fibo (0.6758) and 50% Fibo (0.6598) levels from the April 09, 2025 rally.
βοΈMarket entry is strictly based on technical analysis patterns!!!
βββββββββ
βοΈUnlock powerful market patterns
Join ForexTimes now!!!
βββββββββ
β‘οΈ JOIN VIP COMMUNITY β¬ οΈ
βββββββββ
VIP ForexTimes is:
β‘οΈTrading signals.
β‘οΈβ¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @HellenaSignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
πΈAnabelSignalsπΈ Best Free Forex & Gold Signals @anabelsignals Β· 32,065 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 5 September 2026
πππ ππππ π ππ ππππ @GoldKing101 Β· 90,152 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 54 here β alongside 53 others β read 16 August 2026
MARKET ANALYSIS @signalsfc Β· 31,425 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here β alongside 73 others β read 6 September 2026
TopTradingSignals(Best Forex & Gold Signals) @top_tradingsignals Β· 32,667 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 5 September 2026
πNova Scalper Channelβ’.π @Novascalperchannel Β· 23,310 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here β alongside 69 others β read 10 September 2026
Gold Trader Alliance π @BrianTradingForex Β· 46,738 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 72 here β alongside 71 others β read 27 August 2026
VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) @VasilyTrading Β· 42,583 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here β alongside 82 others β read 29 August 2026
AMarkets - Trading Ideas @AMarkets_en Β· 28,821 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here β alongside 82 others β read 9 September 2026
SM News @SM_News_24h Β· 42,316 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here β alongside 78 others β read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.