Bitcoin and Gold Outlook: Bitcoin broadly consolidates, Gold falls as US JOLTS Job Openings rise Bitcoin (BTC) maintains sideways trading around the immediate $78,000 support on Tuesday. The Crypto King outlook shows signs of cooling after the recent rally above... Read More👈

Channel
FXStreet Crypto News
@fxstreetcrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,820subscribers
-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001235679526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fxstreetcrypto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fxstreetcrypto |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 10,820 | -41 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 10,861 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 10,856 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:33 | 10,857 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 10,858 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 10,857 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 10,859 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 10,865 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 10,873 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 10,875 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 10,874 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 10,879 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 10,887 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 10,885 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 10,890 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 10,899 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 10,897 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 10,896 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 10,902 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 10,901 | first reading |
Engagement
330 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.56%
- avg views ÷ 10,820 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 169
- 276 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.916%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 277
- of 330 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 124 of 276 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 330 (5 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 46,640 |
| Reactions total | 215 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
307 reactions across 163 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 136 | 44.3% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 17.3% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 14.0% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 7.82% | |
| 🐳 | 15 | 4.89% | |
| ✍ | 12 | 3.91% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 3.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 2.93% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.651% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.326% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.326% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 330 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 330 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Uniswap Price Forecast: UNI rally gains momentum amid growing retail demand, RWA DEX volume Uniswap (UNI) maintains a firm bullish outlook, trading at $5.84, up more than 10% on Tuesday. The decentralized exchange (DEX) native token has marked four straight days of gains, underpinning a robust technical... Read More👈
💯1
Strategy spends $635M buying back STRC as perpetual preferred stock lags $100 par Strategy’s perpetual preferred stock, Stretch, continues to struggle to reach its $100 par value despite the company’s ongoing repurchase... Read More👈
❤1
Ripple Price Forecast: XRP risks extending decline as fragile technical structure persists Ripple (XRP) retains a neutral-to-bullish outlook, trading at $1.37 on Tuesday. The remittance token upside has remained broadly constrained since the rally to $1.70 on August... Read More👈
❤1🥱1
Crypto Today: Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP struggle to extend gains despite ETF inflows Cryptocurrency prices are broadly consolidating on Tuesday, after the uptrend stalled amid renewed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East last weekend. Bitcoin (BTC)n hovers above $78,000 support as bulls struggle to extend... Read More👈
❤1
Bitcoin Price Forecast: Bitcoin kicks off September with strength after 25% August surge Bitcoin (BTC) starts September on a stronger footing after delivering a nearly 25% monthly return in August, its best performance in 21... Read More👈
💯1
Bonk Price Forecast: BONK eyes breakout rally as retail demand rises Bonk (BONK) price is up 7% on Tuesday, building on the previous day’s 7% gains to reclaim the 14% loss from last week. A Solana-based meme coin is gaining retail attention as speculative, leverage-driven demand has lifted BONK Open Interest by 35% over the last 24... Read More👈
FXStreet Crypto News pinned a photo
Every funded trader had to pick the right challenge first. 💡 The problem? Drawdown types, restrictions and profit targets vary more than they seem. And the details aren't always easy to find. Propinder makes them visible, all in one place. https://fxstreet.page.link/8z5u865K4iLdhvuT6 Find challenges from: ✔️ FundedNext ✔️ The5ers ✔️ FTMO ➕ Dozens more!
🔥2❤1👍1
Pi Network Price Forecast: PI holds steady as OpenPay brings back cash-in feature Pi Network (PI) price is trading in the green above $0.0910 on Tuesday, sustaining its 10% monthly gains in August. OpenPay announced the reintroduction of the cash-in feature, allowing users to convert PI tokens and other altcoins into the OUSD stablecoin, on... Read More👈
❤1
Hyperliquid Price Forecast: HYPE gains as US expansion talks, institutional demand boost sentiment Hyperliquid (HYPE) trades above $84.30 on Tuesday, heading toward the record high at $86.75 set on... Read More👈
❤2
BlackRock drives $217M Bitcoin ETF rebound as altcoin funds continue streaks US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) returned to inflows on Monday, led almost entirely by BlackRock, while Ether, XRP and Solana funds continued attracting... Read More👈
Showing the 12 most recent of 330 posts we hold for @fxstreetcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fxstreetforex · 103,9913 posts频道名称
@fxstreetforexcn · 791 postFXStreet Deutschland
@fxstreetforexde · 1061 postFXSteet繁体中文网
@fxstreetforexhk · 1731 postFXStreet Russia
@fxstreetforexru · 3381 postFXStreet Türkiye
@fxstreetforextr · 951 postFXStreet Việt Nam
@fxstreetforexvietnam · 1981 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fxstreetforex · 103,991
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@analyticsinsightmag · 34,884
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@www_Bitcoin_com · 55,781
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@AMarkets_en · 28,921
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
@mycareerfeed · 29,448
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@tradingwithrayner · 76,257
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FXStreet Crypto News” (@fxstreetcrypto), 10,820 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fxstreetcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.