Channel
@financialnews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,553subscribers
-96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001120131873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @financialnews |
| Created | 11 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/financialnews |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 6,553 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 6,558 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 6,571 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 6,583 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 6,595 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 6,600 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 6,606 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 6,612 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 6,611 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 6,617 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 6,628 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 6,640 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 6,648 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 6,649 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 6,649 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🚀 Looking for a simple, high-frequency Gold EA? I'm currently offering my EA FREE to new users. ✅ Designed to trade one position at a time (No Martingale, No Grid, No Layering) ✅ High-frequency trading style ✅ Optimized for XAUUSD (Gold) ✅ Opens and closes trades throughout the day based on market opportunities If you're interested in trying it, simply register using my broker link, and I'll provide the EA free of …
Done also . Using TBST method
Done today
Coz i got a video for you. If you can understand malay version. Teknik yang tak pernah anda dengar tapi dah wujud sebelum SND atau SMC lagi Rata2 dah jadi silent trader 👌
HOW MANY MALAYSIAN PEOPLE HERE 🤔
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
SPOT GOLD FALLS NEARLY 1% TO $3,962.11/OZ Gold slipped nearly 1% to $3,962.11 per ounce as investors reduced safe-haven demand amid shifting risk sentiment in global markets. The decline reflects a pullback in bullion prices as traders reassess macroeconomic conditions and adjust positions following recent volatility
UK rate futures now price 35 basis points of Bank of England tightening by end-2026 following jobs data, up from 29 bps on Wednesday.
Gold rises to weekly high as US, Iran reach peace deal-FX
japanese equities continue to rally, with the Nikkei climbing 5.1% to 69,359.86.
BREAKING: 🇯🇵 JAPAN WILL HIKE INTEREST RATES TO 1.00% TOMORROW AT 11 PM FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 31 YEARS MARKETS ARE PRICING IN A 99% CHANCE FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER HISTORICALLY, EVERY TIME JAPAN HIKES INTEREST RATES, $BTC DUMPS 25–30% THIS IS EXTREMELY BAD FOR MARKETS...
ECB Interest Rate Decision (Jun) $EUR Actual: 2.4% Forecast: 2.4% Previous: 2.15%
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @financialnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
HOW MANY MALAYSIAN PEOPLE HERE 🤔
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Financial Markets News” (@financialnews), 6,553 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/financialnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.