Channel
@EWAplans
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,754subscribers
+797 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001803820798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EWAplans |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EWAplans |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 2,754 | -19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 2,773 | -78 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 2,851 | -189 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 3,040 | +4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 3,036 | -11 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 3,047 | -941 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 3,988 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 3,986 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 3,981 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 3,989 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 3,977 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 3,973 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 3,966 | +2,008 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,958 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 1,960 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,957 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 1,957 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
138 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 72 | 52.2% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 34.1% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 5.80% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.35% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.725% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥈#XAGUSD – Silver / U.S. Dollar Silver’s strong possible wave (iii) reached the 66.5317 region. If that wave is complete, the chart now tracks a possible wave (iv) correction toward the 38.2% retracement near 62.6947. • Above 66.5317: wave (iii) may extend • 62.6947: possible wave (iv) watch zone • 60.9365: structural overlap reference • 54.7760: main invalidation 🔖 Chart Link #Ewplans #Elliottwave #elliottwaveth…
❤2
🇪🇺🇬🇧 #EURGBP – Euro / British Pound EUR/GBP Wave ② c-leg targets 0.618 Fib at 0.8505. Wave ③ bullish impulse follows — structural buy zone. EUR/GBP completed a major Wave II low at 0.84611 and launched Wave III. The internal Wave ① peaked at the 1.0 Fibonacci near 0.8588, and Wave ② is now in its A-B-C correction — with the c-leg targeting the 0.618 Fibonacci at 0.8505. This is the structural buy zone before Wave …
❤🔥3
🇺🇸 #DXY – U.S. Dollar Index 📊 The U.S. Dollar Index has completed a textbook five-wave bullish impulse as Wave (1) — with Waves (1) through (5) developing cleanly from the ④ structural low and culminating in the (5)/(1) terminal high near 101.80. The subsequent A-B-C corrective Wave (2) is now in its C-leg decline. Current price at 99.696 has reached the critical Fibonacci support zone with two possible completion s…
❤🔥6❤3
🥈#XAGUSD – Silver / U.S. Dollar 📊 Silver has been executing a textbook five-wave bearish impulse following the A-B-C-D-E contracting triangle top near the 75–77 area. Wave 1 dropped to ≈61, Wave 2 bounced to ≈71–72, and Wave 3 — the most powerful leg — drove XAG/USD through an internal (i)-(ii)-(iii)-(iv)-(v) sequence to approximately 54.776. Now Wave 4 is running its corrective structure: (a)-wave rallied to the 0.…
❤9
🥇 #XAUUSD - Gold / U.S. Dollar 📊 Gold is executing a second contracting triangle as Wave ④ — and it is nearly complete. Following the ③ structural low near 3,941, the A-B-C-D-E corrective triangle developed with precision: (A) rallied to 4,218, (B) corrected to 3,959, (C) rose to 4,165, (D) pulled back to 4,000 — and now the final (E) wave is advancing toward 4,080–4,100 to complete the triangle. Current price: 4,04…
❤🔥4❤1👌1👍1
🇪🇺#EXY – EURO Index 📊 The Euro Currency Index (EXY) has just completed one of the most structurally clear Elliott Wave sequences visible in currency index analysis right now. A major five-wave bearish impulse drove EXY through Waves (i)-(ii)-(iii)-(iv)-(v), completing Wave 1 near 113.50 in late June. From that structural low, Wave 2 began — developing first as a corrective (a) rally to ≈114.60, then forming a precis…
❤🔥4❤2🤯1
🇺🇸🇨🇭 #USDCHF – U.S. Dollar / Swiss Franc 📊 USD/CHF has been executing one of the most structurally precise Elliott Wave sequences in the forex market right now. From the May 2026 structural low near 0.7756, the entire bullish impulse has unfolded across two degrees: Completed — Wave ①: A full five-wave advance (i-ii-③-④-⑤) with internal iii/(5) labeling, reaching the 1.0 Fibonacci at 0.82019. Wave ② then corrected v…
❤7
🇬🇧🇨🇦#GBPCAD – British Pound / Canadian Dollar 🎯 What should you do? Get the complete H4 + D1 Elliott Wave breakdown for GBP/CAD at EWPlans.com — updated daily across 39 instruments. Know the c/(y) zone. Know when Wave 5 launches. 🔖 Chart Link #Elliottwave #Free #forex #fx #signal #Elliott #Wave #DXY
👍5❤🔥1🤔1
🥈#XAGUSD – Silver / U.S. Dollar 📊 Silver's Elliott Wave bearish impulse sequence from the 89.38 historic high has just reached a critical structural milestone. Waves 1, 2, 3, and 4 have all completed with precision: Wave 1: Dropped from the triangle (B)/(E) high to approximately 61.50 Wave 2: Corrected toward 70–71 Wave 3: The most powerful leg, subdividing internally (i)-(ii)-(iii)-(iv)-(v) down to approximately 55…
❤🔥6
🥇 #XAUUSD - Gold / U.S. Dollar 📊 Gold has been executing a precisely structured Elliott Wave sequence since its May 2026 highs. A large-scale bearish impulse drove price through Waves ①-②-③, with the ③ low reaching approximately 3,941. From that structural low, Wave ④ launched — and it is developing as a textbook A-B-C-D-E contracting triangle: (A) rallied to ≈4,218 (B) corrected to ≈3,959 (C) recovered to ≈4,165 (D…
❤🔥6
🇪🇺🇺🇸 #EURUSD – Euro / U.S. Dollar 📊 EUR/USD has been executing a complex multi-wave corrective and impulsive structure from its May 2026 highs. After a large-scale bearish impulse completed the (iii) low near 1.1325, the pair launched a corrective recovery structure. A textbook (A)-(B)-(C)-(D)-(E) contracting triangle formed and resolved upward — triggering a fresh bullish impulse. Wave (C)/④ peaked near 1.1483, and…
🥰6❤1
🇳🇿🇺🇸 #NZDUSD – New Zealand / U.S. Dollar 📊 NZD/USD established a major structural low near 0.5600 following the completion of a large-scale bearish impulse sequence. From that base, a new five-wave bullish impulse launched with textbook clarity: Wave i rallied to approximately 0.5740, Wave ii corrected to 0.5667–0.5672, and Wave iii — the most powerful sub-wave — drove price all the way to 0.5864. Now Wave iv has be…
❤🔥6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EWAplans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elliott Wave Plans” (@EWAplans), 2,754 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EWAplans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.