Empowering civil service aspirants since 2006 | Premier coaching for UPSC IAS & Other State Civil Services in India.
Bhubaneswar Branch- https://g.co/kgs/GJReyCA
Elgin Road Kolkata - https://g.co/kgs/XBMx11g
Salt Lake Kolkata -https://g.co/kgs/y6hZeZy
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @APTIPLUS — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
25 measurements spanning 88 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,942–8,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 11:19
8,042
-1
30 Oct 2026, 05:48
8,043
+1
27 Oct 2026, 15:56
8,042
-14
24 Oct 2026, 09:28
8,056
+1
21 Oct 2026, 14:37
8,055
-8
18 Oct 2026, 03:26
8,063
-1
15 Oct 2026, 00:46
8,064
+13
12 Oct 2026, 03:02
8,051
+1
5 Oct 2026, 08:54
8,050
+8
26 Sept 2026, 20:58
8,042
+2
17 Sept 2026, 22:01
8,040
+1
14 Sept 2026, 04:16
8,039
+11
10 Sept 2026, 19:22
8,028
+8
5 Sept 2026, 19:01
8,020
+8
1 Sept 2026, 11:47
8,012
+1
29 Aug 2026, 02:15
8,011
+6
25 Aug 2026, 21:25
8,005
+4
22 Aug 2026, 11:55
8,001
+12
18 Aug 2026, 20:44
7,989
+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:13
7,986
first reading
Engagement
191 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.01%
avg views ÷ 8,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.635%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 191 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
191 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
5,810
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 11:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,000
Videos
≈227
Links
≈5,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 34 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35
94.6%
👍
2
5.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 191 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
𝐎𝐏𝐒𝐂 𝐌𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐒 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓 𝐆𝐒 𝐏𝐀𝐏𝐄𝐑–𝐈𝐈𝐈 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫
From Economic Development to Science & Technology, Environment to Disaster Management — GS Paper III demands more than just knowledge. It demands analytical thinking and structured answer writing.
𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤 : https://youtube.com/shorts/_qjy2RSpb4c?feature=share
Understand the Issues. Analyse the Challenges. Write with Precision.
Starting your UPSC/OPSC journey? 🎯 Avoid common beginner mistakes and learn how to prepare smartly with the right guidance from APTI PLUS, Bhubaneswar!
Link : https://youtube.com/shorts/axV-5AhPxCM?feature=share
#UPSC #OPSC #UPSCPreparation #OPSCPreparation #APTIPLUS #APTIPLUSBhubaneswar
🎉 𝟐𝟎 𝐘𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐓. 𝟏,𝟎𝟎𝟎+ 𝐒𝐔𝐂𝐂𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒. 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐂𝐘 𝐎𝐅 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐄𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄!
Celebrating 20 glorious years of APTI PLUS Academy for Civil Services (2006–2026)! Two decades of dedication, expert guidance and countless success stories in the journey of shaping future civil servants.
✨ 20 Years of Academic Excellence
🏆 1,000+ Success Stories
🤝 A Legacy of Trust & Achievement
🎁 𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝟐𝟎𝐓𝐇 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐃𝐀𝐘 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐄𝐑 – 𝐅𝐋𝐀𝐓 𝐁𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐅𝐈…
Weekly Current Affairs ( 26th Oct – 31st Oct 2026)
🎯 UPSC Prelims + WBCS + OPSC
This week’s most important news, covered in one place:
✅ Exam-focused coverage
✅ Active revision for better retention
✅ PYQ linkage to show how the topics get asked
Don’t miss it. Revise smart, score better! 💯
▶️ Watch now: https://youtu.be/OZCiDdBPU6g
🔐 THE HINDU EDITORIAL | AI Training Models & Data Privacy
🤖 Can AI Innovation Grow Without Compromising Privacy?
AI models can extract personal information even from anonymised training data, raising serious concerns about consent, surveillance and data protection.
🔍 Key Insight: India’s DPDP Act, 2023, needs stronger safeguards to address emerging AI-related privacy risks.
📌 Key Areas to Focus:
▪️ AI and data privac…
Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @APTIPLUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 38 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Naman Sharma IAS Academy @naman21 · 25,231 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 September 2026
📖 OPSC LIBRARY 📖 @OPSCLIBRARY · 22,787 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
Indian History Quiz MCQs UPSC @spectrum_indian_history_quiz_gk · 53,850 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
Shashank Sajwan @iasips_mentor · 82,399 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“APTI PLUS Academy For Civil Services” (@APTIPLUS), 8,042 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APTIPLUS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.