Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for APTI PLUS Academy For Civil Services

Channel

APTI PLUS Academy For Civil Services

@APTIPLUS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,042subscribers

+83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001261925702
TypeChannel
Username@APTIPLUS
DescriptionEmpowering civil service aspirants since 2006 | Premier coaching for UPSC IAS & Other State Civil Services in India. Bhubaneswar Branch- https://g.co/kgs/GJReyCA Elgin Road Kolkata - https://g.co/kgs/XBMx11g Salt Lake Kolkata -https://g.co/kgs/y6hZeZy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/APTIPLUS

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@APTIPLUS/23357 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC@iasgyanpdfs/159325 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC1.0072 seconds
@iasgyanpdfs/159375 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC@APTIPLUS/23362 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@iasgyanpdfs/159385 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC@APTIPLUS/23363 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@APTIPLUS/23367 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC@iasgyanpdfs/159406 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@APTIPLUS/23368 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC@iasgyanpdfs/159416 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC1.0072 seconds
@iasgyanpdfs/159446 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC@APTIPLUS/23371 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@iasgyanpdfs6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @APTIPLUS — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,9588,0648,0116 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,958 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,969 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,972 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,986 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,989 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,001 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,005 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,011 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,012 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,020 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,028 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,039 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,040 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,042 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,050 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,051 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,064 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,063 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,055 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,056 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,042 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,043 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,042 subscribers8,0426 August 20262 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 88 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,942–8,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 11:198,042-1
30 Oct 2026, 05:488,043+1
27 Oct 2026, 15:568,042-14
24 Oct 2026, 09:288,056+1
21 Oct 2026, 14:378,055-8
18 Oct 2026, 03:268,063-1
15 Oct 2026, 00:468,064+13
12 Oct 2026, 03:028,051+1
5 Oct 2026, 08:548,050+8
26 Sept 2026, 20:588,042+2
17 Sept 2026, 22:018,040+1
14 Sept 2026, 04:168,039+11
10 Sept 2026, 19:228,028+8
5 Sept 2026, 19:018,020+8
1 Sept 2026, 11:478,012+1
29 Aug 2026, 02:158,011+6
25 Aug 2026, 21:258,005+4
22 Aug 2026, 11:558,001+12
18 Aug 2026, 20:447,989+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:137,986first reading

Engagement

191 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.01%
avg views ÷ 8,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.635%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 191 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held191 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total5,810
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 11:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,000
Videos
≈227
Links
≈5,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 34 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3594.6%
👍25.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 191 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC83 viewsread 4 November 2026

𝐎𝐏𝐒𝐂 𝐌𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐒 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓 𝐆𝐒 𝐏𝐀𝐏𝐄𝐑–𝐈𝐈𝐈 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 From Economic Development to Science & Technology, Environment to Disaster Management — GS Paper III demands more than just knowledge. It demands analytical thinking and structured answer writing. 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤 : https://youtube.com/shorts/_qjy2RSpb4c?feature=share Understand the Issues. Analyse the Challenges. Write with Precision.

4 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC85 viewsread 4 November 2026
Poll

Give Answer

  1. Option a44%
  2. Option b44%
  3. Option c0%
  4. Option d11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC82 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐘 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐘𝐐 | 𝟒𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 📚 𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐏𝐘𝐐𝐬. 𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐫. 🎯 𝐔𝐏𝐒𝐂 | 𝐖𝐁𝐂𝐒 | 𝐎𝐏𝐒𝐂 | 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐏𝐂𝐒 👇 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫: 𝐚 / 𝐛 / 𝐜 / 𝐝

3 Nov 2026, 13:27 UTC215 viewsread 4 November 2026

Starting your UPSC/OPSC journey? 🎯 Avoid common beginner mistakes and learn how to prepare smartly with the right guidance from APTI PLUS, Bhubaneswar! Link : https://youtube.com/shorts/axV-5AhPxCM?feature=share #UPSC #OPSC #UPSCPreparation #OPSCPreparation #APTIPLUS #APTIPLUSBhubaneswar

3 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC227 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🎉 𝟐𝟎 𝐘𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐓. 𝟏,𝟎𝟎𝟎+ 𝐒𝐔𝐂𝐂𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒. 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐂𝐘 𝐎𝐅 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐄𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄! Celebrating 20 glorious years of APTI PLUS Academy for Civil Services (2006–2026)! Two decades of dedication, expert guidance and countless success stories in the journey of shaping future civil servants. ✨ 20 Years of Academic Excellence 🏆 1,000+ Success Stories 🤝 A Legacy of Trust & Achievement 🎁 𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝟐𝟎𝐓𝐇 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐃𝐀𝐘 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐄𝐑 – 𝐅𝐋𝐀𝐓 𝐁𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐅𝐈…

❤2

3 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTC186 viewsread 4 November 2026
Poll

Give Answer

  1. Option a50%
  2. Option b20%
  3. Option c0%
  4. Option d30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC178 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🧠 𝐃𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐘 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙 | 𝟑𝐫𝐝 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 | 𝐃𝐈𝐆𝐈 𝐘𝐀𝐓𝐑𝐀 🎯 UPSC | WBCS | OPSC 🤔 Can you identify the correct statements about CITES? Comment your answer below!

3 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC504 viewsread 4 November 2026

Weekly Current Affairs ( 26th Oct – 31st Oct 2026) 🎯 UPSC Prelims + WBCS + OPSC This week’s most important news, covered in one place: ✅ Exam-focused coverage ✅ Active revision for better retention ✅ PYQ linkage to show how the topics get asked Don’t miss it. Revise smart, score better! 💯 ▶️ Watch now: https://youtu.be/OZCiDdBPU6g

3 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC149 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔐 THE HINDU EDITORIAL | AI Training Models & Data Privacy 🤖 Can AI Innovation Grow Without Compromising Privacy? AI models can extract personal information even from anonymised training data, raising serious concerns about consent, surveillance and data protection. 🔍 Key Insight: India’s DPDP Act, 2023, needs stronger safeguards to address emerging AI-related privacy risks. 📌 Key Areas to Focus: ▪️ AI and data privac…

❤1

3 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC168 viewsread 4 November 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/LgvCqOlzD2E?si=aFG3_3oO3BhnWNL9

Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @APTIPLUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 38 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz9 voters

Give Answer

  1. Option a44%
  2. Option b44%
  3. Option c0%
  4. Option d11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz10 voters

Give Answer

  1. Option a50%
  2. Option b20%
  3. Option c0%
  4. Option d30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 07:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz29 voters

Give Answer

  1. Option a24%
  2. Option b31%
  3. Option c38%
  4. Option d7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz20 voters

Give Answer

  1. Option a25%
  2. Option b35%
  3. Option c35%
  4. Option d5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz18 voters

Give Answer

  1. Option a11%
  2. Option b50%
  3. Option c17%
  4. Option d22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz26 voters

Give Answer

  1. Option a23%
  2. Option b35%
  3. Option c15%
  4. Option d27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Naman Sharma IAS Academy
@naman21 · 25,231
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 September 2026
📖 OPSC LIBRARY 📖
@OPSCLIBRARY · 22,787
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
Indian History Quiz MCQs UPSC
@spectrum_indian_history_quiz_gk · 53,850
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
Shashank Sajwan
@iasips_mentor · 82,399
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“APTI PLUS Academy For Civil Services” (@APTIPLUS), 8,042 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APTIPLUS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.