Полезные материалы для подготовки к ЕГЭ и олимпиадам по физике. Если ты сдаешь физику, то тебе точно надо сюда залететь😎
Онлайн-курсы: https://shkolkovo.info/j1
Заявка: № 5684093284
Created
20 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -429. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,600–35,225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 07:05
34,724
+9
28 Aug 2026, 05:58
34,715
-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:24
34,718
+17
26 Aug 2026, 07:48
34,701
-3
25 Aug 2026, 10:09
34,704
-30
24 Aug 2026, 11:54
34,734
+17
22 Aug 2026, 17:43
34,717
+21
21 Aug 2026, 11:37
34,696
-21
19 Aug 2026, 13:47
34,717
+22
18 Aug 2026, 14:24
34,695
+18
17 Aug 2026, 13:45
34,677
+5
16 Aug 2026, 08:28
34,672
-22
14 Aug 2026, 16:24
34,694
-61
13 Aug 2026, 07:45
34,755
-44
12 Aug 2026, 05:53
34,799
-13
11 Aug 2026, 08:15
34,812
-70
10 Aug 2026, 05:11
34,882
-49
9 Aug 2026, 07:53
34,931
-99
8 Aug 2026, 09:18
35,030
-122
7 Aug 2026, 11:30
35,152
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.90%
avg views ÷ 34,724 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
129 (3 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
443,550
Reactions total
6,348
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,780
Videos
≈381
Links
≈2,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
42m 05s
Average length
2m 48s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,348 reactions across 128 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,145
49.5%
❤🔥
964
15.2%
🔥
760
12.0%
👍
324
5.10%
🍓
205
3.23%
😁
124
1.95%
💯
121
1.91%
💘
94
1.48%
🎉
91
1.43%
🥰
70
1.10%
👏
60
0.945%
🍾
50
0.788%
👾
32
0.504%
💋
31
0.488%
😱
31
0.488%
💅
30
0.473%
🙏
30
0.473%
😭
27
0.425%
🐳
26
0.41%
😢
22
0.347%
19 further kinds
111
1.75%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,348reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что ждать на ЕГЭ-2027 по физике?
Первая часть изменений не претерпела. Ожидаем увидеть всё те же задачи, что и в прошлом году. Во второй части по имеющейся сейчас информации мы ждём следующее распределение тем по номерам:
№21 - постоянный ток
№22 - механика
№23 - МКТ и термодинамика
№24 - МКТ и термодинамика
№25 - электродинамика, но без постоянного тока и оптики
№26 - законы сохранения, кинематические связи или ст…
До 1 сентября остается совсем немного
Самое время переключаться с летнего режима на рабочий и начинать готовиться к экзаменам
Старт годового курса - 14 сентября
‼️НО!! У вас есть возможность начать готовиться уже сейчас
При подключении годового курса вы получаете доступ к летнему курсу этого года и к материалам годового курса прошлого года 🔥
➡️А ещё до 1 сентября вы можете успеть подключить курс до нового повыше…
Продолжаем разбирать оформление второй части ЕГЭ по физике. Сегодня поговорим о сокращениях в решении 📝
Многие ученики боятся сокращать записи, думая, что эксперт может снизить за это баллы. На самом деле это не совсем так.
✔️ Если использовать общепринятые сокращения, никаких проблем не возникнет.
Какие сокращения допускаются? 👇
🔴 Стандартные физические сокращения
Можно использовать сокращения, которые давно при…
Касаемо демоверсии - переживать не из-за чего 🔥
Всё, что мы сегодня получили - это некоторые изменения в кодификаторе
Для тех, кто занимается у нас на курсе, не стоит ничего бояться. Во-первых, изменения небольшие, а во-вторых, годовой курс покрывает абсолютно ВСЁ.
В течение подготовки мы разберём всё, что требуется знать для успешной сдачи ЕГЭ. Поводов для паники - нет 🙃
Если вы не хотите лишний раз переживать о …
Как обстоят дела с физикой?
Глобальных изменений НЕТ
Как мы и ожидали, как и говорили, немного поменялась тематика задач второй части по сравнению с прошлым годом
Но это не страшно, предсказуемо, понятно, так что - всё с кайфом😎
Стрим в 19:00 по разбору демки запустим для вас😎
Гриша разберет для вас весь Варик
Также этот вариант дадим как пробник на летнем курсе, поэтому можете смотреть сразу, а можете в начале его прорешать и потом посмотреть разбор
А я пошел записывать для вас ролик:
«Что будет на ЕГЭ 2027 по физике и как готовиться»
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @AV_EGE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Все время не хватало времени, приходилось пропускать тренировки23%
Не занимался спортом37%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 287,898 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Максим Коваль. ЕГЭ по математике @MO_EGE · 71,820 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Саня Эбонит | Физика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @sanyaebonit · 74,601 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fizikaoge · 69,746 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Математика с Ильичом | ЕГЭ проф мат | 100балльный репетитор @ilchegg · 163,984 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Макс Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул @physicsisanywhere · 51,883 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Тим и Решалы | Физика ОГЭ | Тим Гук и правило рук ✋ | Умскул @phys_tim · 50,451 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Таня Коваль. ЕГЭ по русскому языку @TatiashkaEGE · 50,540 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Grand Exam - Арсений Филин @grandexam_ege · 49,989 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Вика Ланская | Информатика ЕГЭ 2027 | ИнфаВикуся | Умскул @infa_vikusya · 43,834 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артем Виталич Физика ЕГЭ и Олимпиады | Школково” (@AV_EGE), 34,724 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AV_EGE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.