Channel
@AZ_LD_27
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
68subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001815960436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AZ_LD_27 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AZ_LD_27 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 68 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 69 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 70 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 53.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We need three or more volunteers to form a committee that will review Judges that are on the 2026 ballot and make an up or down decision on retention for each judge. Please forward this request for help to your PC's. I know this ask will require significant time and effort but now is the time to put on the Armor of God and get in the fight. We MUST stop the communists! Right now, the Bar and the Judges do not feel …
👍1
https://x.com/trooper_cobb/status/2082870253873430723
Photo, posted without a caption
Here is a list of the 7 Republicans who voted AGAINST the NDAA, including the US/Israeli military merger: -Josh Brecheen (OK) -Tim Burchett (TN) -Eli Crane (AZ) -Harriet Hageman (WY) -Anna Paulina Luna (FL) -Thomas Massie (KY) -Chip Roy (TX) All other Republicans voted ‘Yes.’ Follow @zeeemedia Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
❤1🙏1
Unofficial but it looks like our preferred slate is going to win... Biggs Petersen Kolodin Yee All look like they have won their primaries.
❤1
Only 66,800 in-person voters GET OFF YOUR ASSES!!
Voting / ID Check is working
❤3💯1
The Arizona State Department of Public Safety lost their Motor Vehicles Department Connectivity about 40 minutes ago, so they cannot run ID's or Plates (or verify 10-27 for 10-29 (warrant/records) - happened just before 08:00 and is still not up yet. Are polling places having ID check issues also? ?https://x.com/trooper_cobb/status/2079593078499705013
Mail ballots in statewide count. AZ statewide primary early ballot returns - Last Day of Early Voting (7/20): Final Analysis going into election day. 802,935 early ballots are in - nearly 1 in 5 registered Arizonans has already voted. 🔴 Reps 372,025 (46.3%) 🔵 Dems 352,789 (43.9%) ⚪ Ind/Other 78,121 (9.7%) Reps lead by 19,236 ballots (+2.4 pp) of 802,935 in. Of independents who've voted: 🔵32,462 pulled a Dem ball…
👍2
Printable copy
Make sure you all vote tomorrow.
Only 24 hours left🗳 But there's one problem 😬 66% fewer voters are voting than in 2022😰 Imagine this nightmare scenario if participation stays low: ❌ Your backyard BBQ suddenly needs a government permit ❌ Gas shoots up to $8/gallon ❌ Farms dry up under insane regulations ❌ Schools push wild agendas on our kids ❌ Our wide-open desert turns into another packed, over-regulated California mess with California-Styl…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @AZ_LD_27. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AZ LD 27 GOP Channel” (@AZ_LD_27), 68 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AZ_LD_27.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.