Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
52 measurements spanning 81 days, net -1,749. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,604–55,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 13:20
53,866
-8
25 Oct 2026, 16:41
53,874
-8
24 Oct 2026, 16:59
53,882
-11
23 Oct 2026, 16:16
53,893
-24
22 Oct 2026, 19:18
53,917
-27
21 Oct 2026, 16:45
53,944
-17
20 Oct 2026, 13:48
53,961
-37
19 Oct 2026, 14:39
53,998
-33
18 Oct 2026, 11:44
54,031
-13
17 Oct 2026, 13:31
54,044
-18
16 Oct 2026, 12:10
54,062
-18
15 Oct 2026, 15:36
54,080
-19
14 Oct 2026, 15:20
54,099
-34
13 Oct 2026, 07:04
54,133
-89
9 Oct 2026, 03:15
54,222
-98
4 Oct 2026, 13:19
54,320
-194
26 Sept 2026, 05:19
54,514
-164
17 Sept 2026, 08:02
54,678
-50
15 Sept 2026, 08:19
54,728
-21
13 Sept 2026, 17:22
54,749
first reading
Engagement
539 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.45%
avg views ÷ 53,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,550
191 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
192
of 539 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held
539 (1 August 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total
869,881
Reactions total
21,408
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Oct 2026, 09:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,300
Videos
≈6,070
Links
≈19,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 19m
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 199 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60,361 reactions across 529 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤮
13,706
22.7%
🤬
11,124
18.4%
👍
9,941
16.5%
❤
6,102
10.1%
🔥
4,369
7.24%
😁
4,114
6.82%
🤔
4,030
6.68%
👏
2,906
4.81%
🤯
1,598
2.65%
😢
1,294
2.14%
👎
926
1.53%
🎉
251
0.416%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 537 of the 539 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,739 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 539 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
72
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 537 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zeeemedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 539 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Michael Yon and I discuss the possibility of the Iran War/AI labs being used as the excuse for the internet shutdown they're aggressively preparing us for now.
Full show: https://rumble.com/v7hakzk-full-force-depopulation-ft.-michael-yon.html
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
There are many ways to prepare, these are just a couple of things that I have personally been doing, and will continue to do. Alternative currency, power, food, water, comms, etc. You all know the drill. The more prepared we are, the less they can surprise us, the less fearful we will be.
The point is not to scare anyone. The point is to make people mentally prepare for the worst possible scenario, prepare physicall…
The Pentagon is preparing every major US military base to operate for at least 90 days without outside electricity, fuel, water or supplies, anticipating a major war that could cripple power grids, break global supply chains and threaten critical infrastructure on US soil.
The plans include portable nuclear reactors, large-scale battery storage and microgrids able to disconnect installations from the civilian electr…
BREAKING: New Paper Reveals How mRNA "Vaccine" Materials Could Spread From Vaccinated to Unvaccinated People
There have been TWO distinct forms of mRNA vaccine shedding identified: internal transcriptional spread and potential human-to-human transfer.
1. HUMAN-TO-HUMAN SHEDDING:
Studies have detected vaccine SPIKE PROTEIN and mRNA on or within circulating exosomes MULTIPLE YEARS after vaccination.
Exosomes are na…
Netanyahu on election campaign trail says Trump is willing to join him, and only him, in “eliminating the Iranian threat once and for all.”
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
Anthropic says, "the physical effects of climate change may increase our operating costs," warning in its IPO filing that hotter temperatures mean more electricity and water to keep data centers cool.
So we went from 'climate change is a hoax' (which it is) in order to make way for 6 billion data centers to 'climate change affecting our data centers is the reason your electricity bills are going up.'
https://www.bl…
Defence Secretary urges British public to be ready for war within 1,000 days.
The war is coming whether or not we want it, believe it, or have prepared for it. And it isn’t just Britain. I have been warning for years. I pray those who have listened attentively have been preparing. We have a mere few short months left.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/defence-secretary-british-public-war-37808587
Follow @zeeem…
If you missed it👇
Michael Yon joins us for his assessment of current events asserting they are moving forward with full-force depopulation plans through any means necessary, which is why this war won't end any time soon.
Watch here: https://rumble.com/v7hakzk-full-force-depopulation-ft.-michael-yon.html
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
Ursula von der Leyen, who has spent years enforcing that mass immigration is required in Europe because “diversity is our strength,” now says that Russia is using mass immigration as a weapon against Europe.
LOL I cannot deal with these lizards honestly.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
Update on the Bongina Block Party
Dan has been crashing out, telling his botted viewers that he’s going to send a “gift” to the party which many perceived as a veiled threat.
He also suggests those planning this party, which literally may include a bouncy castle for children in attendance, is a “foreign influence operation” that is putting “public safety” and “bank accounts” at risk.
Doc Pete Chambers responds to …
“Science” today is actually Satanism. I know those words tend to get overused, but the biotech industry is DEEPLY steeped in the occult, just like the scientists involved in MKUltra were. This entire industry is Satanist. Plain and simple.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
👍119🔥20👏14❤10🤬4😢4🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 539 posts we hold for @zeeemedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zeeemedia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 76 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 95 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest. @craigkelly · 27,009 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official @australiaoneparty_official · 32,031 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸 @stewpeters · 133,533 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Man in America 🇺🇸 @maninamerica · 29,689 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
Australiaforfreedom @australiaforfreedom · 19,464 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 September 2026
The Exposé News (Official) @dailyexpose · 27,601 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Chef Pete Evans @ChefPeteEvans · 28,488 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Wide Awake Media - Official Channel @realwideawakemedia · 36,611 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
World Doctors Alliance @worlddoctorsalliance · 75,183 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Wide Awake Media @wideawakemedia · 26,753 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
The Crowhouse @thecrowhouseoffical · 29,321 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr Jane Ruby @DrJaneRuby · 57,417 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Hidden In Plain Sight @hiddeninplainsight1 · 38,200 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 31 August 2026
Reignite Democracy @reignitedemocracy · 22,303 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
Covid BC (Excess Deaths) @covidbc · 30,921 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Health Nut News/Erin Elizabeth @erinhealthnutnews · 20,704 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Dr Naomi Wolf @NaomiWolfDr · 24,809 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
Independent Medical Alliance @IMA_Health · 31,180 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
Christine Anderson, MdEP (AfD) @christineanderson · 35,086 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
REALCHRISSKY @realchrissky · 31,737 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 67,164 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Steve Kirsch Channel @stkirsch · 18,957 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 October 2026
Covid Vaccine Injuries @covid_vaccine_injuries · 24,751 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
Dr. Simon @goddek · 38,615 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 70 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zeee Media 🎙” (@zeeemedia), 53,866 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeeemedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.