Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @stkirsch — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
37 measurements spanning 60 days, net -519. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,084–19,759 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 22:22
19,162
-60
27 Sept 2026, 12:55
19,222
-93
17 Sept 2026, 17:15
19,315
-17
15 Sept 2026, 12:15
19,332
-10
13 Sept 2026, 21:41
19,342
-11
12 Sept 2026, 04:59
19,353
-28
9 Sept 2026, 21:19
19,381
-31
6 Sept 2026, 16:21
19,412
-27
4 Sept 2026, 08:55
19,439
-11
2 Sept 2026, 23:16
19,450
-15
1 Sept 2026, 19:53
19,465
-9
31 Aug 2026, 18:46
19,474
-5
30 Aug 2026, 17:35
19,479
-11
29 Aug 2026, 18:52
19,490
-10
28 Aug 2026, 19:59
19,500
-5
27 Aug 2026, 22:12
19,505
-6
27 Aug 2026, 01:42
19,511
-4
26 Aug 2026, 01:54
19,515
-10
25 Aug 2026, 01:54
19,525
-10
23 Aug 2026, 17:17
19,535
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 36 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Autism survey results show why pediatricians have been unable to associate vaccines with autism
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/autism-survey-results-show-why-pediatricians
Sudden-onset autism survey results show it’s the vaccines causing autism. No doubt about it.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/sudden-onset-autism-survey-results
Jmii paper adds to the evidence that the COVID vaccine opens up the blood-brain barrier (BBB) which can cause permanent neurological injury or death
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/jmii-paper-adds-to-the-evidence-that
The BMJ unethically retracts the Mostert paper that showed excess deaths kept increasing at the same rate after the COVID shots rolled out
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-bmj-unethically-retracts-the
The average age that parents noticed their children became autistic shifted dramatically after the MMR shot rolled out
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-average-age-that-parents-noticed
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @stkirsch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel @DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,964 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
COVID-19 Up @COVID19Up · 25,896 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Dr. Lynn Fynn’s Science Enlightenment Channel & Stuff @DrLynnFynn · 24,247 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
Dr Jane Ruby @DrJaneRuby · 58,105 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr Naomi Wolf @NaomiWolfDr · 25,045 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
World Council for Health @wch_org · 34,447 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Dr. Simone Gold @DrSimoneGold · 80,676 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD · 104,693 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
GreenMedInfo @sayeregengmi · 27,738 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Independent Medical Alliance @IMA_Health · 31,499 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
Dr David Martin @DrDavidMartin · 50,334 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
The Exposé News (Official) @dailyexpose · 27,837 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon @DrMikeYeadon · 27,087 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
Dr. Judy Mikovits @dr_judymikovitss · 25,460 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Child Covid Vaccine Injuries UK @childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk · 19,125 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
Mikki Willis Official @OfficialPlandemic · 33,108 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
Covid Truth Network @covidtruthnet · 58,406 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr. Mercola @DoctorMercola · 31,287 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest. @craigkelly · 27,448 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺 @ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 84,436 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
The TRUTH About Cancer | Vaccines @TheTruthAboutCancer_Vaccines · 28,749 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Man in America 🇺🇸 @maninamerica · 29,897 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Steve Kirsch Channel” (@stkirsch), 19,162 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stkirsch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
