International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 23 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net -6,285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 321,929–330,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:21
322,872
-344
17 Sept 2026, 05:40
323,216
-253
15 Sept 2026, 03:15
323,469
-254
13 Sept 2026, 12:17
323,723
-262
11 Sept 2026, 19:37
323,985
-259
9 Sept 2026, 08:56
324,244
-509
5 Sept 2026, 22:38
324,753
-314
3 Sept 2026, 19:38
325,067
-147
2 Sept 2026, 09:17
325,214
-102
1 Sept 2026, 08:53
325,316
-174
31 Aug 2026, 06:06
325,490
-107
30 Aug 2026, 07:16
325,597
-118
29 Aug 2026, 08:46
325,715
-136
28 Aug 2026, 10:27
325,851
-172
27 Aug 2026, 09:13
326,023
-66
26 Aug 2026, 09:04
326,089
-140
25 Aug 2026, 07:54
326,229
-134
24 Aug 2026, 08:07
326,363
-297
22 Aug 2026, 13:27
326,660
-219
21 Aug 2026, 01:55
326,879
first reading
Engagement
206 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 322,872 subscribers
Avg views / post
68,800
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 206 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
206 (3 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
6,878,000
Reactions total
136,158
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
35
Videos
44
Links
62
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1h 06m
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
271,880 reactions across 197 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
69,741
25.7%
🔥
33,741
12.4%
👍
24,506
9.01%
🤣
20,848
7.67%
🤬
19,126
7.03%
🤮
18,301
6.73%
👏
10,891
4.01%
💩
9,673
3.56%
😁
8,825
3.25%
🤔
8,292
3.05%
🙏
5,316
1.96%
😢
4,880
1.79%
👎
4,466
1.64%
🎉
4,044
1.49%
🌚
3,744
1.38%
💯
3,592
1.32%
😈
3,181
1.17%
🥱
3,119
1.15%
🍾
2,650
0.975%
🤯
1,980
0.728%
20 further kinds
10,964
4.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 206 of the 206 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 283,297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 206 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
165
across the posts below
Posts paid on
58
of 206 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @disclosetv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 206 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
NEW - Hacking group ShinyHunters claims it stole data on all FBI employees and applicants, including agents' home addresses, phone numbers and spouse details, through an Oracle zero-day and defaced its jobs site with a nod to Trump: "Thank you for your attention to this matter."
Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/0wevk9hozo/
@disclosetv
NEW - U.S. will build two military bases in southern and eastern Greenland under trilateral deal signed by Trump, PM of Denmark and the PM of Greenland.
Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/8zjqhv6di9/
@disclosetv
NOW - Trump says the "very same people who said we'll all be dead in 12 years because of global warming... are the same people that are now saying that AI is going to kill us all, that robots are going to attack us, and that everything is going to be a total disaster."
@disclosetv
NOW - Trump at the UN says he has a "big decision to make:" "Will a deal be made with Iran? ... Or, do I annihilate the Islamic Republic, and do it quickly? ... Do I drive them into hell with no chance of survival and no hope of future greatness for generations?"
@disclosetv
NEW - Trump admin proposes a $5 billion fund to rebuild critical infrastructure across the Middle East damaged in the war with Iran, even as the seven-month conflict continues.
Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/fg1l4lyc6v/
@disclosetv
JUST IN - Merz's CDU drops out of the state parliament in a northeastern German state after failing to clear the 5% threshold — a historic election defeat for the party, as the AfD finishes first.
@disclosetv
JUST IN - Former BlackRock chairman and German Chancellor Merz is not resigning despite disastrous election results of his party (CDU) in today's state elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.
According to projections, the AfD emerged as the leading party in the Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania election with 37 percent of the vote. In the Berlin House of Representatives election, Infratest dimap has the l…
JUST IN - Trump says the U.S. has reached an agreement with Denmark and Greenland granting "permanent" American control over security there at no cost, and will develop a large Military presence in the appropriate part of Greenland.
Source: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117294126158197822
@disclosetv
🔥1,200🤡516🤔125👍107🤬91🍾73🎉36
Showing the 12 most recent of 206 posts we hold for @disclosetv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@disclosetv edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 665 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 807 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wide Awake Media - Official Channel @realwideawakemedia · 37,273 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS @stfn_news · 63,099 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Insider Paper @insiderpaper · 108,477 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
LiveLeak @leaklive · 141,984 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
The General @GeneralMCNews · 144,492 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
BRICS News @bricsnews · 153,127 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Thuletide @thuletide · 22,703 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 September 2026
Real World News @RealWorldNewsChannel · 25,209 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 September 2026
The Exposé News (Official) @dailyexpose · 27,989 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Andy Ngo (Official) @Andy_Ngo · 34,545 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Nicholas Veniamin @NicholasVeniamin · 92,283 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
Becker News @beckernews · 28,300 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
Qtime Network 🇺🇸🇳🇱 @QtimeNetwork · 29,543 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 208,241 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
[QR] [Crumbs] [8Bakes] [Covfefe] @Q_Anon8 · 21,634 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
Mel Gibson @mel_gibsonchannel · 59,687 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
Police frequency @police_frequency · 70,162 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
The Justice League @THEREALTORIABROOKE · 27,121 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
Chef Pete Evans @ChefPeteEvans · 29,077 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Market News Feed @marketfeed · 38,658 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
NetBlocks @netblocks · 48,809 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Keith Woods @keith_woods · 28,253 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 9 September 2026
Official Simon Parkes @simon_parkes · 113,136 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
Reuters: World @ReutersWorldChannel · 49,958 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 308 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Disclose.tv” (@disclosetv), 322,872 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/disclosetv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.