Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Durov's Channel” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 352 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 October 2015 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 36 days, net -539,039. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,729,286–11,430,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 14:41
10,810,142
-45,874
7 Sept 2026, 13:19
10,856,016
-40,511
4 Sept 2026, 18:20
10,896,527
-22,900
3 Sept 2026, 02:26
10,919,427
-18,374
2 Sept 2026, 00:23
10,937,801
-19,507
1 Sept 2026, 02:08
10,957,308
-17,820
30 Aug 2026, 23:37
10,975,128
-24,167
29 Aug 2026, 22:47
10,999,295
-15,253
28 Aug 2026, 23:53
11,014,548
-11,760
27 Aug 2026, 21:45
11,026,308
-10,230
26 Aug 2026, 20:13
11,036,538
-11,660
25 Aug 2026, 21:03
11,048,198
-15,684
25 Aug 2026, 00:12
11,063,882
-36,832
23 Aug 2026, 08:17
11,100,714
-26,329
21 Aug 2026, 17:56
11,127,043
-13,527
20 Aug 2026, 17:45
11,140,570
-11,245
19 Aug 2026, 19:33
11,151,815
-11,978
18 Aug 2026, 18:46
11,163,793
-9,192
17 Aug 2026, 18:43
11,172,985
-16,265
16 Aug 2026, 17:04
11,189,250
first reading
Engagement
427 posts held, back to 28 October 2015 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 10,810,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,880,000
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 427 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
427 (28 October 2015 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
20,190,000
Reactions total
580,940
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Sept 2026, 12:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
102
Videos
46
Links
199
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
45s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 7 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 7 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 38 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 39.5% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 67.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 803,000 views — 7.43% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 1,268,000).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
3,286,746 reactions across 29 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5373223594484587136
971,172
29.5%
custom 5265077361648368841
811,550
24.7%
custom 5399847211989246390
729,380
22.2%
custom 5936157098181135162
407,104
12.4%
custom 5465587407350942612
367,540
11.2%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 421 of the 427 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,850,778 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 427 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2015 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
381,110
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 421 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
49,100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @durov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 427 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 October 2015 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💸 In just one month, Telegram has awarded over $2,222,000 to some of the brightest minds on our planet.
🎨 This week alone we distributed $222,000 among the winners of our two latest competitions — the Design Contest and the Digital Freedom Contest.
On top of that, over the past month we awarded prizes worth more than $2 million to the winners of the 2026 International Olympiads in Informatics and AI.
We're proud t…
31 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,040,000 views38,770 reactions35,400 Starsread 11 September 2026
Video
🏳️ Gram Wallet in Telegram is ready and is now accessible to a select group of users.
🤩 We'll be gradually rolling it out to our billion+ users over the next couple of weeks.
⚡️ Thanks to the validators who approved the smart contract that powers it, future upgrades of the wallet won't require painful migrations.
This is just one of the innovations we've built to make non-custodial wallets usable ✨
A high-school student just made $20,000 from a Telegram Gift.
Jonathan He, an IOI gold medalist ranked #7 in the world, sold his Algorithm Cup — an NFT we gave to the top young coders this month — for 💎 15,000 Grams.
Happy for him. It's a meaningful sum for someone still in school, and I suspect a small fraction of what he'll go on to build.
20 years ago, $20K was enough for me to launch my first company. Within m…
24 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC≈3,000,000 views65,300 reactions14,700 Starsread 11 September 2026
🚨 Two years ago, I was detained in Paris by police for 3 days — the longest they can hold someone before charging them.
In an unprecedented move, French authorities accused the head of a major platform of crimes committed by its users.
That investigation is still ongoing, although it makes less sense with each passing year.
Why?
Because we now have extensive evidence that Telegram was neither worse than other pop…
18 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈3,370,000 views93,600 reactions17,200 Starsread 11 September 2026
💎 Telegram has applied for the .gram domain zone.
If the application is approved by ICANN, a billion Telegram users could get their own second-level domains.
🖥 For example, @durov would get durov.gram, and @monk would get monk.gram.
Users would be able to set up their interactive websites hosted by Telegram — just by typing one prompt ✨
15 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈3,640,000 views70,400 reactions15,800 Starsread 11 September 2026
🏆 The International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) ends today.
🇷🇺Students from Moscow and St. Petersburg won 2🥇gold and 2🥈silver medals — well done, Vladislav Zhiganov (#2 overall!), Maksim Kravchenko, Sergei Mukhanov and Vladimir Zvezdin!
🇺🇦Ukraine won 3 medals: 🥇 gold for Vladyslav Khalin, and 2🥈 silver for Illia Shevchenko and Daria Perekopska 💪
🇧🇾 Belarus took 1🥇gold and 1🥈silver, won by Kiryl Kardash and Fioda…
14 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈5,110,000 views217,900 reactions25,300 Starsread 11 September 2026
1️⃣3️⃣ Telegram turns 13 today.
For over half that time — the past 7,5 years — it's been one of the 10 most downloaded mobile apps in the world.
A whole generation has grown up with it 💪
🎂 Happy birthday, Telegram!
🇺🇿 The 2026 International Olympiad in Informatics starts today in Tashkent.
🏆 The IOI is the ultimate coding competition for high-school students. Years ago, many members of the Telegram team won medals there.
🤝 To support the best young programmers in the world, Telegram will award the 235 winners exclusive digital collectibles — Algorithm Cups — worth at least $117,000 in total.
🕌 It’s fitting that IOI is hosted…
8 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC≈3,210,000 views61,050 reactions8,220 Starsread 11 September 2026
🏆 The International Olympiad in AI finished yesterday in Astana.
🇷🇺 The Russian team took first place in the team competition, and Artem Gorokhov from my home city won the individual event. Well done! 💪
🇰🇿 I'm equally happy for the host country, Kazakhstan, whose Dauzhan Beketov took the second-highest individual score.👏
📩We're in touch with the organizers to deliver the winners' prizes from Telegram ($106,500+) s…
4 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈4,010,000 views75,300 reactions17,800 Starsread 11 September 2026
Last night, Apple briefly removed Telegram from the App Store because a single user had planted illegal pornographic content in a public group chat.
⬅️ Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks.
🧹Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using all kinds of moderation tools,…
3 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈3,460,000 views59,250 reactions15,400 Starsread 11 September 2026
Photo
🧠 The 2026 International Olympiad in Artificial Intelligence starts today.
As a token of support for those who will reinvent our civilization, we'll issue 🏆 240 exclusive Intelligence Cups to the winners.
💵 We guarantee minimum buyback prices ($1,000 per Gold Cup, etc.), but the cups' limited supply may make them worth much more on the secondary market.
Good luck, AI coders! 🍀
Showing the 12 most recent of 427 posts we hold for @durov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@durov edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13,182 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
6
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@durov named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@karatelibelarusi named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 19 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@telegrambelarus named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 9 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@auction named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@amadnews named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@nameofthechannel named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@pavel named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
dorogo @dorogo · 107,628 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 6 September 2026
Durov's Code @durovs_code · 38,089 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
BotNews @BotNews · 131,233 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
Roxman @roxman · 7,197,928 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 August 2026
Telegram Tips @telegramtips · 11,007,640 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 August 2026
Telegram News @telegram · 9,592,633 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
Crypto News @crypto_news778 · 82,012 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Telegram Usernames @username · 1,316,934 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
Roxman печатает… @roxtalk · 487,747 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Telegram Contests @contest · 299,219 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Crypto Oxygen @CryptoOxygen · 31,108 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
ohuenko @ohuenko · 329,429 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
1win news @news_onewin · 28,610 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
پروکسی_کانفیگ_کانفینگ_v2ray_ویتوری_ایرانتل @iran_tl · 45,456 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026
Telegram Info @tginfo · 83,145 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Telegram APKs for Android @TAndroidAPK · 257,287 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 20 August 2026
Trending Apps @trendingapps · 3,852,638 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
Телеграм Ладесова @bafet · 176,932 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 1 September 2026
BeePass VPN @beepassvpn · 98,251 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Noticias de Telegram @TelegramES · 147,767 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Breaking News (TimeBucks.com) @breakingnewstb · 41,252 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 29 August 2026
Ton Post @tonpost · 73,474 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
ODES → Breaking News @odes_news · 88,530 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Geography_Anirudh Malik @geography_5 · 27,221 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 495 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
14 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
13 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Telegram(de.wikipedia.org) “…die App mit den meisten Downloads war.{{Internetquelle |url=https://t.me/durov/152 |titel=Durov’s Channel |werk=t.me |datum=2021-02-08 |sprache=en…” read 23 August 2026
Arrest and indictment of Pavel Durov(en.wikipedia.org) “…your support... |url=https://t.me/durov/342 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240909144509/https://t.me/durov/342 |archive-date=2024-09-09…” read 23 August 2026
List of most popular social platforms(en.wikipedia.org) “…billion{{Cite web |date=2024-07-22 |title=Du Rove's Channel |url=https://t.me/s/durov |access-date=2025-03-19 |website=Telegram}}
|
|-
|[[LinkedIn]]…” read 23 August 2026
List of people with the most children(en.wikipedia.org) “…|url=https://t.me/durov/339 |title=Du Rove's Channel |first=P. |last=Durov |year=1974 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241112200837/https://t.me/durov/339…” read 23 August 2026
Pavel Durov(en.wikipedia.org) “…|url=https://t.me/durov/137 |access-date=27 December 2025 |website=Telegram}}{{Cite web |title=Pavel Durov
|url=https://t.me/durov/171 |access-date=27…” read 23 August 2026
تلگرام(fa.wikipedia.org) “…برای کاربران پرمیوم دارند.{{Cite web|title=Durov's Channel|url=https://t.me/durov/148|access-date=2022-06-10|website=Telegram}}
در اواخر اوت ۲۰۲۱…” read 23 August 2026
The Open Network(ru.wikipedia.org) “…web|url=https://t.me/durov/501|title=Pavel Durov|website=Telegram|access-date=2026-06-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260618202251/https://t.me/…” read 23 August 2026
Первое интервью Павла Дурова Такеру Карлсону(ru.wikipedia.org) “…что обязательно посмотрите.|Подпись=Павел Дуров{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/durov/262|title=Анонс Павла Дурова интервью Такеру Карлсону|lang=en|author=[[Дуров…” read 23 August 2026
Telegram(uk.wikipedia.org) “…можуть стежити за каналами{{Cite web |title=Durov's Channel |url=https://t.me/durov/148 |access-date=2022-06-10 |website=Telegram}}.
У січні 2021…” read 23 August 2026
WhatsApp(uk.wikipedia.org) “…web |url=https://t.me/durov/196 |title=Pavel Durov |website=Telegram |access-date=2025-09-18}}{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/Ateobreaking/73535…” read 23 August 2026
Арешт та звинувачення Павла Дурова у Франції(uk.wikipedia.org) “…|url=https://t.me/durov/163 |title=Du Rove's Channel |website=Telegram |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240419181240/https://t.me/durov/163 |archive-date=19…” read 23 August 2026
Дуров Павло Валерійович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…квітень 3). В Телеграм. https://t.me/durov/156 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210403130515/https://t.me/durov/156 |date=3 квітня 2021 }}…” read 23 August 2026
Hacker News
This handle was named 40 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pavel Durov” (@durov), 10,810,142 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/durov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
