Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net +6,654. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,818–79,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 13:49
78,736
+68
2 Nov 2026, 10:40
78,668
+87
1 Nov 2026, 13:21
78,581
+62
31 Oct 2026, 16:08
78,519
+130
30 Oct 2026, 15:56
78,389
+193
29 Oct 2026, 13:05
78,196
+162
28 Oct 2026, 08:56
78,034
+93
27 Oct 2026, 05:20
77,941
+133
26 Oct 2026, 05:18
77,808
+117
25 Oct 2026, 06:29
77,691
+143
24 Oct 2026, 03:36
77,548
+108
23 Oct 2026, 06:07
77,440
+151
22 Oct 2026, 07:50
77,289
+93
21 Oct 2026, 03:40
77,196
+23
20 Oct 2026, 03:16
77,173
+126
19 Oct 2026, 01:41
77,047
+125
18 Oct 2026, 03:16
76,922
+149
17 Oct 2026, 00:47
76,773
+173
16 Oct 2026, 00:45
76,600
+185
15 Oct 2026, 00:09
76,415
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 15 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
342.3%
avg views ÷ 78,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
270,000
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.472%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
27 (15 May 2025 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
2,156,120
Reactions total
10,178
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 20:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
8
Videos
124
Links
49
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 54s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35,645 reactions across 27 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
18,269
51.3%
👎
17,376
48.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,645 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💭 Multi-Message Reply
Select 2–5 messages and reply to them all at once. Quotes appear as a swipeable card deck, letting you flip between messages, remove individual quotes, and jump back to the originals.
By @niklavrukhin · Source Code
Want your project featured?
Check the requirements and submit your work via channel messages.
💬 Quick Sticker Reply — Send Stickers Like Reactions
Reply with a sticker as quickly as you react to a message. Just hold the sticker icon, slide to your favorite sticker, and release to send. No need to open the sticker panel.
By @art_ew · Source Code
Want your project featured?
Check the requirements and submit your work via channel messages.
🖼️ Per-Photo Actions & Editing for Sent Albums
Press and hold any photo in an album, then slide your finger across the others to reply to, edit, forward or save just the one you need. Sent albums can be edited too: remove photos, add new ones, reorder them and change the caption.
By @patso_o · Source Code
Want your project featured?
Check the requirements and submit your work via channel messages.
💎 Offer on Gifts Directly from Chat
Tap Money in any chat, pick one of their gifts, and make an offer in GRAM. They can accept or decline in one tap. Your GRAM is safely held and returned if they decline or 24h pass.
By @imogen · Source Code
Want your project featured?
Check the requirements and submit your work via channel messages.
🔍 Visual Quote — Reply to Specific Details in Photos
Select any area of a photo and reply directly to it. Your reply highlights the selected detail, and tapping it opens the original photo zoomed in. No annotations or extra images needed.
By @ricky_heinicke · Source Code
Want your project featured?
Check the requirements and submit your work via channel messages.
Black hole animation for clearing a chat
An irreversible action should be noticeable, so the user clearly understands they’ve deleted the conversation.
Ready-to-implement code
Suggested by @riveaux
🎙 Proposed Idea: Voice Message Transcription and AI Summary
We've all been in situations where we've received long voice messages. Maybe your manager dictated a bunch of tasks, a friend shared a story, or a classmate sent a lecture recording. And often, you need to do more than just listen — you need to find something important, jot down a thought, or respond to something that was said.
And that's where things get …
✨ Designers × AI
🆕 The mockup era is over. Today’s AI tools give every designer a superpower: you can now craft your ideas, not just draw them.
The gap between “what if…?” and “look, it works!” has never been smaller, and that changed how we build features in Telegram.
Message @designers to submit your concepts.
✔️ We accept
– Working, ready-to-implement code
complemented by
– A demo video of your feature in act…
🏆 Design Contest 2026, Round 2: Results
😲 90% of eligible winners from Round 1 decided to continue making Telegram better and suggested a bunch of meaningful improvements to further polish the apps.
🤲 Thank you all for your efforts – this steady pace and persistence are what set you apart, and it's what we value at Telegram. Keep going!
💡 Now meet the winners and their inventive ideas:
1st PLACE
🥇 Brave Flamingo …
🏆 Design Contest 2025: Results
🔄 The results for Round 1 are in.
🆒 Contestants produced a tremendous amount of high-quality work. We increased the prize pool by more than 50% to fairly reward all the notable submissions.
▶️ Another round for selected winners is live.
Contest for Artists: Submissions
We received 196 submissions for the Telegram Contest for Artists.
Everyone is welcome to view the submissions while the Telegram judges conduct their own checks.
🚨 Last Call
The deadline is in less than 6 hours.
Start uploading your work now. A submission is considered successful only after the archive has been fully uploaded.
Do not postpone your submission until the very last moment.
Late submissions will not be accepted.
👎179👍164
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @designers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 56 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@designers named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ambatubusssst named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 19 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@gymofmessengers named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@contestforcontentcreators1 named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@hotmeatsandwichsub named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@victor_igin named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Telegram Contests @contest · 297,503 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Crypto Bot Tips @CryptoBotTips · 30,618 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 5 September 2026
قناة تيليجرام @TelegramArabia · 77,822 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 August 2026
CNN Venezuela @cnnvenezuela · 19,898 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 2 October 2026
BotNews @BotNews · 132,693 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram Designers” (@designers), 78,736 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.