Channel
@nobleswallow2026round2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003978925538 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nobleswallow2026round2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 18 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nobleswallow2026round2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 10 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 11 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:08 | 4 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 2 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 2 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
TABLE OF CONTENTS I'm presenting two works — an updated, user-friendly share menu, as well as stacks for those who, like me, find even 30 folders not enough. As in the first round, I wanted to take on the challenge and create the all animations in Figma, without using the boring usual tools like Adobe AE, Principle, or Origami (sources in archive). 🗂 FOLDERS — MP4 • PNG 📣 FORWARD — MP4 • PNG 🫧
📣 FORWARD In this work, in addition to updating the visual part (which has been outdated for about 5–7 years), I separated the flows and made the mechanics more user-friendly: • design, icons, search — iOS 26 • folders and pinned items added • people always at the top (in search too) • filter by all, channels, groups, bots • action buttons within easy reach • all selected recipients visible at once 🫧
🗂 FOLDERS In this work, my goal was to solve UX problems. I'm a heavy folder user — 30 is never enough, and nesting is something I really miss. So I came up with stacks and showed the full flow — creation, setup, notifications, and more. • fits naturally into folder settings • creating a stack is as easy as a folder • adding folders to a stack is effortless • sort and delete just like folders • create a folder dir…
📣 FORWARD • PNG Some static screens (the rest is available in the Figma source). 🫧
🗂 FOLDERS • PNG Some static screens (the rest is available in the Figma source). 🫧
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @nobleswallow2026round2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forward & Folders” (@nobleswallow2026round2), 10 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nobleswallow2026round2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.