Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор

Channel

Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор

@ilyaskopin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,995subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653889079
TypeChannel
Username@ilyaskopin
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilyaskopin

Growth

9,98010,0059,992.57 August 2026 — 9,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,987 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,990 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,981 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,984 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,997 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,005 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,000 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,996 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,995 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,993 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,980 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,995 subscribers9,9957 August 20269 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 33 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,976–10,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 02:379,995+15
4 Sept 2026, 01:019,980-13
31 Aug 2026, 17:369,993-2
28 Aug 2026, 07:059,995-1
25 Aug 2026, 14:539,996-4
24 Aug 2026, 16:5710,000-5
23 Aug 2026, 00:1210,005+8
19 Aug 2026, 18:239,997+13
16 Aug 2026, 17:339,984+3
13 Aug 2026, 13:169,981-9
10 Aug 2026, 19:429,990+3
7 Aug 2026, 21:479,987-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:319,989no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:299,989first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.7%
avg views ÷ 9,995 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,870
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held14 (9 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total11,490
Reactions total352
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
1m 39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

918 reactions across 14 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁29331.9%
27630.1%
🤣909.80%
🔥465.01%
❤‍🔥434.68%
💯424.58%
👍404.36%
🗿171.85%
😱161.74%
😨151.63%
💘70.763%
🥴70.763%
💊60.654%
👨‍💻40.436%
💔40.436%
🙈40.436%
👻30.327%
🫡20.218%
👏10.109%
🤔10.109%
1 further kind10.109%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 918 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilyaskopin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,160 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026

О чём нужно было думать еще вчера, в эпоху аи трансформации Выписал себе после нашей кор-тим стратсессии два важных вопроса "где заканчивается зона ответственности продуктового дизайнера и начинается ответственность: ▪️инженера ▪️продакта По моим радарам, осталось +- год, до полной трансформации профессии. И тут артефакт мысли таков: базовая матрица ответственности дизайнера значительно расширяется, то есть, через

26👨‍💻4💔3

21 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈3,990 views202 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

Кто в финтехе / банкинге работает? Плз, заберите фитчу себе: как будешь выглядеть, когда ипотеку выплатишь

😁171🔥12👍7🥴7💯21👏1💔1

18 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈3,250 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Готовы ли AI-агенты к реальной работе дизайнера?🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ Просишь Claude или GPT собрать экран, а в ответ получаешь набор компонентов, который потом все равно приходится переделывать руками. Цвета не из палитры, отступы не по сетке, у кнопок нет состояний. После пары таких попыток легко решить, что агенты пока не готовы к нормальной работе. Но тут есть нюанс: возможно, дело не только в самой модели, а в том, как

🗿14💊6🙈42

17 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈3,090 views91 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

Прикольный кейс у дуолинго, 16 лет у них на подряде работала Лондонская студия Animade. Эта студия также работала с LEGO, Apple, Google, etc. Если пользовались продуктом, то знаете, в дуолинго оч много графики, анимашек и всякой смежной хрени. Так вот, спустя 16 лет дуолинго купили эту студию и теперь у них своя креативная студия инхаус :) инхаус-команда > меньше согласований > больше экспов > продукт приятнее и по

71😱16👍2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈3,940 views57 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Если послушать всех рукопожатных аи-адоптеров, послушать все цели рукопожатных топ-менеджеров, то всё сводится к понятной и приземленной цели: нужно стараться каждый месяц сжигать лимит максимальной подписки (условной Pro от Open AI за 100$) артефакт: новые нейронные связи, и блин, реально, это работает! просто попробуйте сжечь лимит )) столько придумаете нового

😁43👍103🥱1

31 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈5,170 views62 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Так, ну давайте, вы же продуктовые дезигнеры, объясните плз, по какой логике крестик слева, а по какой справа. Я не понимаю, например 🤔

🤣30😨15💯8👍3👻3🫡2🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈4,690 views58 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

У меня в фигме давно лежит иллюстрация на тему одного из приницпов дизайна интерфейсов — доведение до самой сути, на примере Winamp'a. Кста, олды наверняка помнят, сколько раньше было "скинов" :)

48👍10

27 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈3,600 views103 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Блин, смешно. Я выступал на продакт фесте в субботу с в блоке поразгонять про AI, всместо Мердана, он приболел. Состав хороший: Никита, Саша и Миша — познакомились за кулисами, оч опытный и интересный мужик. Кмк, я бы с ним про кино мог весь день разговаривать. Так вот, когда мы заканчивали этот блок: от зала осталось 10%, все ушли :)) В глазах людей считывалось что-то типо: "КАК ЖЕ ВЫ ЗА****И СО СВОИМИ АИ / С КАЖДО

😁79💯195

24 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC≈3,790 views35 reactionsread 29 August 2026

AI-агент поможет сгенерировать 50 вариантов. Но не скажет, какой делать Важный дисклеймер: на данном этапе развития AI-адопшена в продуктовый дизайне существует проблема: дизайнеры без привязки к продукту могут делать всё, что угодно, но находясь в продукте, аи-адопшен спотыкается об продуктовый контекст Артефакт мысли: в этом и проходит граница между креативом и продуктовым решением НАПРИМЕР: вы работаете в б2б,

🔥16💯136

21 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,080 views76 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Cмотрите какая милота. AI видео-подарок на свадьбу (не мою, нашёл в линке) Автор: pure.sagyna

56🔥10💘7🗿3

20 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC≈3,190 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Final2.psd / Song2.mp3 В 97 году пацаны, которые играли исключительно бритиш-поп, решили затролить свой лейбл и сделали пародию на гранж-рок — грязная и громкая гитара, агрессивный стилёк чтобы "blow the flipping record labels' heads off". У неё не было даже названия, тут как у нас когда-то final.psd, final2.pdf – только song2.mp3. Так и оставили. А когда релизнули — оказалось, что они перевыполнили метрики: тройн

18🔥4👍1

17 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈3,290 views66 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Школа дизайна Яндекса и Никита Аквапарк В 2021 году, насколько я помню, была последняя школа дизайна яндекса, я там был куратором, у меня была своя группа. Кста, каждый из группы по итогу попал в Яндекс, кроме одного чувака, я его хорошо запомнил и вот почему :) Его звали (условно, а может и не условно) Никита. И на первую групповую встречу, а они ещё были оффлайн, где мы прорабатывали кейсы, обсуждали лучшее решен

🤣60👍4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ilyaskopin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ilyaskopin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 35,140
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,613
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,288
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 42,543
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Оди
@awdee · 33,532
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 78,175
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг
@mutimdigital · 30,259
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 80,192
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
ParaGraph
@paradigm_graphics · 35,157
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 87,136
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
perasperadastra ✱ сучков саша
@perasperagram · 38,658
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
ФРИЛАНСИКИ
@polyaluzjob · 59,317
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Telegram Designers
@designers · 71,633
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
Визуалмув
@visualmove · 30,416
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Дизайн-биржа 💵
@designbirzha · 52,900
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 106,247
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Alfa Digital
@alfadigital_jobs · 54,270
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
Я работаю в digital, детка 🚀
@digital_rabota · 34,045
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
СЕТИ — IT & Digital вакансии
@it_vakansii_jobs · 94,458
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Джуниор Вакансии Стажировки IT
@juniors_rabota_jobs · 67,341
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 63,895
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
СПNЗЖУ DESIGN
@thedesigner · 29,990
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Авоська — junior IT вакансии/cтажировки
@jobs_juniors_remote · 29,128
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
junojobs → стажировки в IT
@juno_jobs · 31,024
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор” (@ilyaskopin), 9,995 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilyaskopin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.