Уничтожаем рутину через нодовые системы Придумывать весело, а вот масштабировать одно и то же бесконечно — нет. Разбираем на трёх примерах, как собрать из нод систему, которая сама делает обложки для статей, серию иллюстраций в едином стиле и десятки иконок для приложения. Один раз настроил — дальше просто пишешь, что нужно Читать на дизайнерс | #нейросети

Channel
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,472subscribers
-1,131 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001244951999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyrillicdesign |
| Description | Публикуем вау-сайты на кириллице с 2018 года #VAEL5 Сайт: https://dsgners.ru Прислать сайт: @cyryllicdesignpost_bot Реклама: @design_manager_bot Мы в реестре: https://vk.cc/cG5cGW |
| Created | 6 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyrillicdesign |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:04 | 34,472 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:39 | 34,486 | -22 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 34,508 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:58 | 34,516 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 34,529 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 34,534 | -21 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 34,555 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 34,556 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 34,563 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 34,576 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 34,581 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 34,588 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 34,599 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 34,607 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 34,620 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:04 | 34,626 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 34,632 | -17 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 34,649 | -16 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 34,665 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 34,668 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.50%
- avg views ÷ 34,472 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,930
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.05%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (24 May 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,590 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,350
- Videos
- ≈43
- Links
- ≈988
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 52s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
373 reactions across 39 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 373 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 17.4%
- 8 of 46 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 8
- posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 2,780
- over 8 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 7,520
- over 36 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VfnxvstyMe | 2 | 25 September 2026 | 29 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqumqiVB | 1 | 22 October 2026 | 22 October 2026 |
| 2VtzqvggPYY | 1 | 29 September 2026 | 29 September 2026 |
| 2Vtzqvh8ng6 | 1 | 29 October 2026 | 29 October 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqDgEKpZoJtCHHsRVW92qDkrFbqizWEWNpikcv | 1 | 6 October 2026 | 6 October 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqDgEKpZpwtZdB8ZL2zPxkwwM6UkDfmucckZJP | 1 | 16 September 2026 | 16 September 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqDgEKpZr2cLKYPdZr6Xxw8dSMyF7DdVAN7coX | 1 | 7 September 2026 | 7 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Бывает, нужно проверить текст без редактора. Приходится по одному копировать тексты из макета в чат с AI, а потом вставлять исправления обратно в Фигму. Дизайнеры Авито Никита Мосолов и Артём Кучеров сделали плагин, который умеет: 🔸 Править орфографию, пунктуацию и типографику. 🔸 Проверять, соответствуют ли формулировки редполитике, тональности и юридическим требованиям. 🔸 Учитывать роль текста в интерфейсе. 🔸 Пред…
❤6
У Авито появился свой шрифт — и это целая история ❤️ Дизайн-команда Авито ведёт канал «Любовь, дизайн и метрики» про продуктовый и коммуникационный дизайн, исследования и то, как всё это живёт внутри большой компании. Недавно вместе со студией Contrast Foundry они сделали Avito Sans — первый собственный шрифт компании. Теперь в канале постепенно делятся результатами: например, можно заглянуть в статью с полным раз…
❤1
Теперь действительно умею всё: как поменялась жизнь мульти-дизайнера День из жизни дизайнера, который не захотел выбирать одну специализацию и теперь решает разнообразные задачи, не уставая от рутины одной сферы. В статье вы узнаете: — Как избегать нехватки знаний — Какова роль нейросетей в жизни мульти-дизайнера — Процесс решения двух задач из разных сфер → Читать на дизайнерс
Уже завтра повышение цены на UX WORKSHOP ⚠️ Вас ждет большая и актуальная программа, более углубленное изучение UX, которое заточенно под новую AI-реальность, с которой столкнулись дизайнеры. 15+ часов лекций и практики. Будем разбирать UX через системное, субъектное, объектное, ресурсное и вариативное мышление, работать с гипотезами, переизобретать решения и отдельно рассматривать сценарии, в которых AI становитс…
Дизайнеров ждёт экшн: что взять с конференции Авито 16 октября в Москве пройдёт Avito Action — конференция про продукт и дизайн. Вот куда точно полезно заглянуть дизайнеру: 🎨 Воркшоп по ИИ для дизайнеров от арт-директора в Авито Авто Ксении Гавриловой. Она поможет по шагам собрать с ИИ свой инструмент и поэкспериментировать, а в конце будет общая галерея работ. 🎬 Публичный разговор «Усилители вкуса». Креативный д…
❤1
Авторский двухнедельный UX-воркшоп для middle/senior продуктовых дизайнеров от Саши Ковальского пройдет уже через месяц. Наверняка вы слышали о UX BOOST, который стал уже легендарным и завоевал тысячи сердец, воркшоп это логичное продолжение, которое направленно на буст тебя как ux/продуктового дизайнера. Вас ждет большая и актуальная программа, более углубленное изучение UX, которое заточенно под новую AI-реальнос…
❤2
А что, если логотип Авито можно встретить не только на экране? ⚡️ Целый год мы придумывали и разрабатывали линейку предметов, в которых логотип компании стал частью дизайна. Где-то его легко заметить с первого взгляда, а где-то понадобится посмотреть на вещь под определённым углом, чтобы его обнаружить. При этом каждый предмет получился практичным. Нам было важно создавать вещи, которыми действительно хочется польз…
❤3
Sjostrand sjostrand.tilda.ws / Дизайн: svoi-design.ru
❤1
«Передумал», «Не буду оплачивать», «Давайте добавим ещё задач» — такие ситуации проще обсуждать, когда условия заказа зафиксированы заранее На Авито Услугах развивается более безопасный и защищенный сценарий взаимодействия между заказчиками и исполнителями. По их данным, 48% заказчиков услуг называют защиту условий сделки своим приоритетом — а значит, что исполнители на Авито Услугах, которые работают с такой защито…
❤1
«Передумал», «Не буду оплачивать», «Давайте добавим ещё задач» — такие ситуации проще обсуждать, когда условия заказа зафиксированы заранее На Авито Услугах развивается более безопасный и защищенный сценарий взаимодействия между заказчиками и исполнителями. По их данным, 48% заказчиков услуг называют защиту условий сделки своим приоритетом — а значит, что исполнители на Авито Услугах, которые работают с такой защито…
🎮 Срочная рабочая задача: играть весь день Отчёты подождут, ведь 30 сентября Mish × RDMI устраивают День геймификации. Эксперты из крупных компаний расскажут: • как устроены механики, из-за которых мы возвращаемся в приложение и залипаем дольше, чем собирались • что запускали, что сработало, что пришлось переделать, а от чего отказаться. Можно будет перенять опыт у тех, кто знает, как вовлекать людей. А на вопрос …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @cyrillicdesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @cyrillicdesign as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@cyrillicbrands · 7,3841 postдизайнерс.приложения
@cyryllicapps · 4,6391 postЛюбовь, дизайн и метрики
@designavito · 10,3531 postдизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,1221 postMish | Дизайн, исследования и разработка
@labmish · 5,3071 postRelate Community&Studio
@relate_community · 9791 postДизайн РнД | AAA CONF 26.09.26
@rostov_design · 8721 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cyryllicapps · 4,639#1
@cyrillicbrands · 7,384#2
@nowhow · 24,335#3
@ilyaskopin · 9,991#4
@cedro_smokingroom · 6,229#5
@olegschanel · 5,081#6
@poyasnizaux · 20,021#7
@designhunters · 79,908#8
@kak_smotret · 10,055#9
@designvorkel · 10,057#10
@chereznemogy · 4,851#11
@desiqn · 3,775#12
@blinklinks · 3,207#13
@design_awards · 21,619#14
@eldanielleee · 3,530#15
@yavnodesign · 5,148#16
@designbirzha · 52,121#17
@hiry_agency · 4,226#18
@design_jobs_uxui · 26,560#19
@uxfromhell · 50,321#20
@sortofdesign · 12,479#21
@designdealer · 85,956#22
@uxfail · 13,194#23
@secretd · 22,124#24
@lagutalaguta · 7,438#25
@ayuev · 12,871#26
@crauchru · 5,910#27
@jun_hi · 23,418#28
@wtfont · 129,211#29
@uxlive · 36,160#30
@morrre_dsgn · 9,857#31
@awdee · 33,237#32
@max_kanalchik · 14,193#33
@refs_hi · 9,584#34
@chipsadesign · 4,308#35
@mikhailnaer · 8,225#36
@craftworkdesign · 4,843#37
@designsniper · 28,012#38
@pdigest · 49,098#39
@readymag_official · 8,166#40
@wannabelikerozov17feb · 16,055#41
@design_jam · 6,734#42
@senior_designer_pragmatica · 17,390#43
@ilyabirman_channel · 14,098#44
@jun_hi_vacancies · 43,116#45
@designdomashka · 11,813#46
@dprofileru · 10,929#47
@typetoday · 9,225#48
@kaketosverstano · 8,300#49
@dsgn_tutorial · 81,271#50
@e_arutyunov · 3,357#51
@kruzhok_designa · 3,207#52
@desprod · 25,643#53
@collectivchik · 6,178#54
@uifail · 14,554#55
@duosapiens · 15,100#56
@behancerdsgn · 40,546#57
@dprofilejob · 17,877#58
@thisisnotatable · 7,239#59
@design_awesome · 9,592#60
@bbeuxui · 10,467#61
@mokaposhnaya · 61,607#62
@rodionovdesign · 1,280#63
@duiux · 6,599#64
@thatsasign · 4,416#65
@sexyfont · 133,818#66
@uxnotes · 23,535#67
@uxlead · 3,462#68
@design_telega · 77,409#69
@pinkmanru · 3,694#70
@goodux · 7,040#71
@featureoftheday · 12,255#72
@sayhellotomaxshirko · 10,450#73
@evgenyuprock · 16,832#74
@uxidesign · 20,445#75
@b_goncharenko · 15,177#76
@AGIMAdesign · 3,196#77
@DesignCraftsPeople · 1,117#78
@shrift_free · 57,375#79
@DesignBoard · 9,371#80
@poledsgn · 22,258#81
@betamoscow · 6,433#82
@ochen_studio · 6,608#83
@itslyoshatg · 3,074#84
@soft_techniques · 4,696#85
@vikkidsgn · 4,014#86
@onyagency · 7,620#87
@wemakefab · 2,833#88
@ui_muse · 5,084#89
@dsgners · 19,122#90
@molokopluss · 7,475#91
@labmish · 5,307#92
@designindex · 1,339#93
@bbe_school · 25,253#94
@figmaweb · 39,878#95
@figmadesign · 105,084#96
@local_talent · 9,093#97
@posterino · 57,042#98
@ozondesign · 17,877#99
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nowhow · 24,335
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
@design_awards · 21,619
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
@perasperagram · 38,126
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
@design_translator · 20,567
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
@dbooks · 62,966
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@posterino · 57,042
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
@mutimdigital · 30,003
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
@artlebedev · 22,049
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
@visualmove · 29,766
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@shrift_free · 57,375
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
@designhunters · 79,908
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@designsniper · 28,012
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
@thedesigner · 29,676
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@tildanews · 32,599
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
@designbirzha · 52,121
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
@designdealer · 85,956
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@mockup_curator · 44,878
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
@dsgners · 19,122
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
@abcletters · 32,549
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
@poledsgn · 22,258
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
@easyfigma · 25,189
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
@pinterest_design_art · 67,969
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
@EasyAdobePS · 21,273
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
@uprockdesign · 21,298
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 84 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“дизайнерс.сайты” (@cyrillicdesign), 34,472 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyrillicdesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.