Channel
@wemakefab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,887subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001376986166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wemakefab |
| Created | 16 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wemakefab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 2,887 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 2,886 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 2,889 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 2,891 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 2,887 | +13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 2,874 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 2,870 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 2,860 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,861 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
200 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 44.5% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 28.5% | |
| 🤔 | 27 | 13.5% | |
| 🆒 | 18 | 9.00% | |
| 👾 | 9 | 4.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В агентстве мы привыкли решать сложные задачи. Но вчера вечером задача была всего одна — забить шар в лузу 🎱 Часть команды выбралась поиграть в бильярд: немного азарта, спортивного соперничества и много попыток сделать вид, что этот удар был задуман именно так. Кто-то оказался мастером точных расчётов, кто-то — неожиданно сильным игроком, а кто-то просто пришёл поддержать командный дух 😎 Ваши ставки, кто выиграл?
❤7👾4🤔2
Ребрендинг Wemakefab идёт полным ходом, делимся первыми визуалами В новый стиль нам очень хотелось добавить цвета. Чтобы этот цвет был уникальным на агентском рынке и мог в дальнейшем ассоциироваться исключительно с Wemakefab. Перепробовали множество вариантов, пока не влюбились в этот электрический фиолетовый. Благодаря этому цвету и новому знаку, стиль преобразился. Стал смелым, выразительным и акцентным. Он отр…
❤15🔥15🤔9🆒2👾1
Работали над креативными концепциями для X5: создавали Key Visual и имиджевые кампании для «Перекрёсток Доставка» и «Пятёрочка Доставка». В основе яркие сезонные сюжеты, акцент на скорости доставки, широком ассортименте и узнаваемой айдентике брендов.
❤18🤔12🔥9🆒4
На прошлой неделе наш основатель Виктор Рындин провёл открытый разбор упаковки digital-студий За несколько дней мы получили более 40 заявок на участие. Большинство студий жалуются на одни и те же проблемы: мало лидов, приходят нецелевые заявки или клиенты ожидают совсем другой бюджет. По итогам разбора мы выявили типичные ошибки, которые встречаются у 90% студий: — размытое позиционирование или его отсутствие; — ке…
❤9🔥5🤔2🆒1
Провели корпоративную фотосессию 📸 В эпоху ИИ-аватарок, нейрофотосетов и бесконечно сгенерированного контента мы остаёмся приверженцами офлайна и реальности. Нам важно, чтобы за Wemakefab стояли настоящие люди, а не идеально сгенерированные картинки. Ну и приятный бонус — отличный повод собраться московской командой, пообщаться и просто классно провести время вместе. Смотрите, какие красавчики 👀
❤21🔥13🆒3
Рассказываем про процесс работы над нашей платформой «Вызов» Это формат, который помогает брендам, стартапам, агентствам и компаниям получать десятки свежих идей и концепций от сильного профессионального сообщества. Работая над проектом, нам было важно сохранить связь с экосистемой Dprofile, но при этом создать самостоятельный продукт со своим характером и визуальным языком. Мы разработали нейминг, продумали упаков…
❤11🔥8🆒4👾3🤔2
На этой неделе командой съездили в Лужники. Но не для того, чтобы поиграть в теннис, а чтобы посетить большую экскурсию, которую для нас провел сам заказчик. За один день мы побывали на Большой спортивной арене, в аквакомплексе, на пляже и во Дворце тенниса. У каждого объекта — свои сценарии использования, аудитория и задачи. Именно это важно было увидеть своими глазами, а не только на схемах и в техническом задании…
❤8🔥7🆒4👾1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @wemakefab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wemakefab” (@wemakefab), 2,887 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wemakefab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.