Стилёвый сайт очередного «убийцы Хрома, основанного на Хроме». Понравился блок со скроллингом внутри маски, очень необычное решение. Да и в целом очень весело и живенько выглядит. https://sigmabrowser.com/
👍9

Channel
@nowhow
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,805subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001068549468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nowhow |
| Description | Сайты с хорошим дизайном со всего света 🤟 Since 2016 Реклама: @DesignAdsManager Регистрация в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/679bcf1cb34cfc6080d9a142 |
| Created | 2 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nowhow |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 24,805 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 24,810 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 24,822 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 24,834 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 24,843 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 24,851 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 24,856 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 24,855 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 24,861 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 24,868 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 24,877 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 24,883 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 24,896 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 24,905 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 24,905 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (1 March 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,050 |
| Reactions total | 108 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
650 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 548 | 84.3% | |
| 👎 | 65 | 10.0% | |
| 🤔 | 37 | 5.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 650reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Стилёвый сайт очередного «убийцы Хрома, основанного на Хроме». Понравился блок со скроллингом внутри маски, очень необычное решение. Да и в целом очень весело и живенько выглядит. https://sigmabrowser.com/
👍9
Чистенький продуктовый сайт с внятным забавным оффером: «Будь как этот чувак. Скачай Conductor». Очень приятно разбавило общую серьёзность https://www.conductor.build
👍10
Хороший пример того, как утрамбовать кучу технической инфы в аккуратненький лендинг https://interfere.com
👍18👎3🤔1
Очень чистенький продуктовый сайт. Пример того, как нужно делать минималистичное промо в 2026 году. Строгая типографика, качественный визуал и неплохой сторитейлинг. Девайс тоже заинтересовал, хотя не уверен, насколько это вообще полезная штука https://nor.ma
👍31👎5
Однозначно крутейший сторитейлинговый сайт этого года, вобравший в себя все последние тренды. Очень понравилась анимация в стиле сериала Silicon valley со зданиями корпораций в изометрии. А страница Why zero это вообще отдельный фильм по скроллу https://www.zero.university
👍25🤔5👎1
Классный светофорный столб, на который можно лепить стикеры)) А так сайтик очень чистенький в лучших традициях японского графдизайна (не путайте с японским вебом) www.hirotos.com
👍32
Pragmatica — наверное одна из самых стильных и крупных российских студий. Все их спецпроекты готов бесконечно нахваливать. Недавно, вот, обновили лендинг Кайференции (их ежегодный дизайн-ивент). Такой же кислотный, но теперь ещё и анимированный(!!) Теперь шакальные ребята танцуют, обкашливают вопросики и стоят в профиль около своих фамилий. Хочется также похвалить дизайн расписания и эпичнейший подвал. Да и в целом к…
👍34👎15🤔5
Фестивальный вау-лендинг на космическую тематику. Чем-то напоминает рекламу iMac Pro 2017. Приятно, что здесь линейное повествование не слишком длинное и не успевает начать раздражать. Отдельный лайк за саунд-дизайн и эффектное приближение луны в конце! boilerlab.ai
👎11👍7
Довольно редко в вебе можно встретить качественную имитацию бумажных обрезков. В основном это делается с помощью теней, приглушения цветов (а-ля печать), добавления "грязи" и неровных краёв. В вебе реализма в этом подражании бумаге довольно сложно, так как параметры теней там намного менее гибкие. motherlandfestival.ru
👍41👎3🤔2
Классное решение с цветными круглыми пикселями https://definedvc.com
👍42👎7
Если бы Уэс Андерсон дизайнил сайты, думаю, он бы сделал что-то подобное. Сайт не то что бы минималистичен, но идеален в пропорциях и симметричной композиции. Чистые иллюстрации, идеально выглаженные фотографии, всё прекрасно в деталях https://giellygreen.co.uk
👍34👎11🤔2
Apple выложили бэкстейджи рекламы Macbook Neo. Интересно это, в первую очередь, как феномен. Apple — одна из самых закрытых для внешнего взора тех. компания — наконец-то завела соцсети и начала предпринимать робкие попытки в диалог с аудиторией. Скорее всего, отдел маркетинга был сильно переформатирован. Возможно, под давлением инвесторов. Сам ролик тоже ощущается несколько странно, будто его отдали на аутсорс. Он хо…
👍77🤔16👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nowhow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Now How Channel” (@nowhow), 24,805 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nowhow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.