Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UX Horn 🌀

Channel

UX Horn 🌀

@uxhorn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,243subscribers

-389 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001095203178
TypeChannel
Username@uxhorn
DescriptionРегулярная подборка актуальных статей по UX Профессиональный гугл и крупнейшее UX СМИ в Рунете В канале @uxdigest публикуются зарубежные статьи Чат ограничен из-за засилья ботов, со всеми вопросами и комментариями сюда @lightmaker 7018117386
Created4 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/uxhorn

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,24021,63221,43621,2436 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 94 days, net -389. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,181–21,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 14:0121,243+3
6 Nov 2026, 15:5621,240-6
5 Nov 2026, 14:5021,246-6
4 Nov 2026, 12:1621,252-6
3 Nov 2026, 14:2621,258-9
2 Nov 2026, 12:3121,267-8
1 Nov 2026, 12:3621,275-10
31 Oct 2026, 13:2621,285+2
30 Oct 2026, 15:5021,283-2
29 Oct 2026, 15:5921,285-13
28 Oct 2026, 12:5821,298+11
27 Oct 2026, 09:2621,287-7
26 Oct 2026, 08:1621,294-5
25 Oct 2026, 05:5721,299-1
24 Oct 2026, 05:3821,300+1
23 Oct 2026, 08:1121,299-4
22 Oct 2026, 08:0521,303-9
20 Oct 2026, 23:4721,312-8
19 Oct 2026, 22:2821,320-9
19 Oct 2026, 00:0421,329first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.23%
avg views ÷ 21,243 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.413%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held67 (6 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total27,662
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈244
Videos
≈12
Links
≈2,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

503 reactions across 62 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥31763.0%
🤝5410.7%
⚡458.95%
✍214.17%
🤩193.78%
🎉122.39%
🕊112.19%
🤓91.79%
🫡91.79%
👀61.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 67 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uxhorn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.49%
1 of 67 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,700
over 66 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqEgzwpVptJf4orEDwHfXyiJsqNrG6Lew3AHUC115 September 202615 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 04:07 UTC795 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Есть ли жизнь после отчета: как в Т2 измеряют вклад UX-исследований В T2 отслеживают, как выводы исследований превращаются в продуктовые решения. Команда показывает свою метрику влияния и объясняет, почему 79% — не главное Кейс: Анонимность, NPS и процессы ИБ - что мы измерили на самом деле В «Авито» повторили опрос сотрудников без анонимности: оценки выросли, а отклик упал вдвое. Можно ли после этого говорить, что …

🔥5🤝1

5 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC909 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Необычный дайджест интересных материалов на продуктовую тему из тг каналов: Подкаст: От исследований до запуска как создавали «Капилку» Рокетбанка смотреть и слушать на Youtube, Apple Podcast, Яндекс.Музыка, Spotify из канала - @productcamp В новом выпуске ProductCamp Podcast разбираем кейс «Капилки» Рокетбанка: от первых исследований пользователей и поиска инсайтов до геймификации, тестирования гипотез и запуска пр…

🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 04:07 UTC968 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Выходной - выходным, а дайджест по расписанию🐱 Будущее исследовательской функции в бизнесе: горизонт 2026–2036 Контур провёл форсайт с 30 экспертами и описал четыре сценария будущего исследований до 2036 года. Главный вызов — перейти от выполнения запросов к ответственности за бизнес-решения Мероприятие: 10 ноября (вторник) в 11:00 пройдёт онлайн-митап Markswebb по Chatbot Rank 2026 Markswebb представит сравнение ч…

🔥4

2 Nov 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Кейс: Как исследования реального опыта водителей помогают разрабатывать автономные грузовики Команда Navio провела наблюдения в рейсах и воркшоп с водителями. Результаты помогли добавить 87 требований к ИИ-водителю и доработать планшет ИИ: Когда пользователь медсервиса — ИИ-агент Виктория Филиппова разбирает риски ИИ-агентов в медицинских сервисах: от опасных советов до непрозрачных рекомендаций. Предлагает четыре п…

🔥4

30 Oct 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,360 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Интерфейс как угроза Мария Летта разбирает, как перегрузка уведомлениями, сложные интерфейсы и слепое доверие автоматике приводят к ошибкам специалистов по кибербезопасности. Показывает, почему снижение когнитивной нагрузки — вопрос безопасности, а не просто удобства Информационная архитектура: практические советы Павел Шерер показывает, как проверять информационную архитектуру на реальных данных и продумывать поиск…

🔥6

29 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,300 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#партнёры Шорт-лист фестиваля «Красное Яблоко» (Red Apple) опубликован! 🍎 368 работ прошли отбор международного жюри, в состав которого вошли более 90 экспертов из 45+ стран В шорт-листе — проекты из четырёх конкурсных блоков: «Креатив», «Маркетинг», «Медиа» и «Молодые креаторы». Кто заберёт награды, узнаем уже 12 ноября на церемонии фестиваля «Красное Яблоко» (Red Apple), которая завершит НРФ’10. В этом году гост…

⚡3🎉2🔥2

28 Oct 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,360 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

UX меняет адрес: от удобства к мотивации пользователя Автор объясняет, почему удобство интерфейса само по себе не гарантирует принятия продукта. Через модели TAM и SDT показывает, как мотивация пользователя влияет на использование продукта и какие психологические потребности должен учитывать UX Интервью: Как исследователи в Банке Уралсиб помогают бизнесу принимать решения Евгений Бик рассказывает, как команда исслед…

🔥4✍2

26 Oct 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,440 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Исследование: 34% россиян ждут от бизнеса заботы о сотрудниках и их семьях Опрос 1261 россиянина показал, чего люди ждут от брендов помимо товаров и услуг. Оценки заботы бизнеса оказались сдержанными, а ожидания сильно различаются по возрасту 📼ИИ: ИИ в количественных исследованиях Дискуссия, в которой обозначили проблемные зоны использования ИИ в количественных исследованиях, а также проблематизировали в целом испол…

🔥6✍2🤝2

23 Oct 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,620 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Проектирование: Почему ваш «чистый» дизайн убивает конверсию в половине мира. Перевод статьи Алексей Кирдяев на примерах финтех-продуктов в Мексике и на Филиппинах показывает, почему привычные западным дизайнерам принципы минимализма и сокращения пользовательского пути могут снижать доверие: в некоторых культурах сложные формы, формальность и даже ожидание решения воспринимаются как признаки надёжности. Автор объясня…

🔥7🤩3⚡1

21 Oct 2026, 04:07 UTC≈1,600 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Интервью: Черкашина ПРО Исследования. "Как выбрать оптимальную цену". Смотреть на VK, RuTube и YouTube Гость - Алена Киселева, кандидат экономических наук. Основатель исследовательского агентства Ноэма. Поговорили про важность исследования цены, существующих на данный момент возможностях и подходах, ну и немного истории и много кейсов Мероприятие: 22 октября (завтра) с 18:00 до 19:30 пройдёт бесплатный онлайн круглы…

🔥6⚡2🤝2

20 Oct 2026, 06:23 UTC≈1,580 views6 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

В подкаст закралась неприятная техническая ошибка, которую вчера активно исправляли🖥️ На данный момент всё хорошо, обновилась только ссылка на YouTube Apple Podcasts YouTube Podster А Яндекс Музыка по ходу не хочет воскресать, но надеемся, что оживёт и подкаст разместится 🤞 Хорошего прослушивания 🎧 Ну и файликом в комментарии закину 😉

🔥6

19 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,470 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Функциональная и информационная архитектуры в агентной разработке Павел Шерер объясняет, как функциональная и информационная архитектуры помогают сохранять продуктовые решения при разработке с ИИ-агентами, которые могут незаметно менять логику системы. На примере интернет-магазина показывает, как связать требования, архитектуру, код и тесты, чтобы контролировать изменения и обнаруживать ошибки, даже когда результат в…

🔥2🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @uxhorn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@uxhorn edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 September 2026
Most recent edit
8 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @uxhorn as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,012
#1
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,409
#2
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,524
#3
Богдан Гончаренко про DesignOps
@b_goncharenko · 15,164
#4
Плавучая редакция
@editboat · 12,545
#5
Сдоба
@konturuxsdoba · 3,624
#6
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,066
#7
Марфицин
@writingtools · 8,406
#8
Конаков Артём, UXART
@konakov_blog · 6,344
#9
Про удобство (Михаил Греков)
@proudobstvo · 18,329
#10
UI-UX фэйл
@uifail · 14,541
#11
Клиентский опыт: инструменты и методы | CX и UX
@cx_lab · 4,626
#12
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,914
#13
Любовь, дизайн и метрики
@designavito · 10,359
#14
Мамкин Дизайнер
@uxrdsgn · 8,358
#15
Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор
@ilyaskopin · 9,994
#16
PostPostResearch: Константин Ефимов и Анастасия Жичкина
@postpostresearch · 12,555
#17
UsabilityLab
@usabilitylab · 4,863
#18
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,211
#19
Дизайн тащит
@design_awesome · 9,591
#20
Миша Наер
@mikhailnaer · 8,225
#21
ResearchOps: объявления
@reopsad · 1,976
#22
UX Lead 🐤
@uxlead · 3,461
#23
Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт
@designvorkel · 10,061
#24
Черезнемогу / Надя Здорова
@chereznemogy · 4,845
#25
Хороший интерфейс
@goodux · 7,040
#26
Product design · Студия «Луч»
@uxfail · 13,186
#27
BBE: UX/UI и продуктовый дизайн
@bbeuxui · 10,462
#28
UI/UX Designer
@uxidesign · 20,425
#29
Фидбечь
@feedbech · 2,181
#30
Дизайн Домашка
@designdomashka · 11,808
#31
Канал Иры Моториной
@redachredach · 8,312
#32
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,316
#33
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,736
#34
dui
@duiux · 6,599
#35
Спросите Киру
@ask_kira · 4,724
#36
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,084
#37
Алиса в стране исследований
@AliceinResearchland · 1,190
#38
Находки Crauch
@crauchru · 5,905
#39
Markswebb Channel
@markswebb · 5,010
#40
Клиентский опыт и качество
@cx_quality · 8,226
#41
просто не грусти
@prosto_ne_grusti · 1,258
#42
Odokienko | Design Twist
@designtwist · 3,260
#43
Королёв про всё остальное
@uxread · 2,013
#44
Не исключение: об инклюзии в цифровом и физическом мире
@neiskluchenie · 5,466
#45
MTS DESIGN | МТС Дизайн
@design_mts · 5,172
#46
Это Лёша
@itslyoshatg · 3,069
#47
UX Work
@uxwork · 8,303
#48
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 79,918
#49
uxksenia Ксюша Морозова
@uxksenia_channel · 2,264
#50
Олег Александров
@olegschanel · 5,081
#51
El Danielle / Даниил Видишев
@eldanielleee · 3,526
#52
Явно.Дизайн
@yavnodesign · 5,148
#53
Вечерние челленджи
@ux_ref · 2,061
#54
ProductSense
@productsense · 17,437
#55
Кузнецов — дизайнер в Алисе
@kuznetsovvvvaleksandr · 2,492
#56
Fresh Product Manager
@FreshProductGo · 19,880
#57
GoPractice!
@gopractice · 29,394
#58
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,320
#59
Фича дня by @hardclient
@featureoftheday · 12,250
#60
Ozøn Design
@ozondesign · 17,871
#61
Продуктовошная Михаила Грекова
@suda_smotri · 6,025
#62
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,121
#63
Оди
@awdee · 33,222
#64
Рефы, привет
@refs_hi · 9,576
#65
Design Board
@DesignBoard · 9,365
#66
Designdealer
@designdealer · 85,910
#67
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,437
#68
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,270
#69
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 43,135
#70
Вакансии для рисёчеров. 6800 подписчиков.
@vakansii_researchers · 6,870 (as read 23 September 2026)
#71
UX Digest ⭕️
@uxdigest · 3,767
#72
дизайнерс.приложения
@cyryllicapps · 4,630
#73
Дизайн-комьюнити
@sortofdesign · 12,488
#74
чтобы что?
@cxuxcx · 1,071
#75
No Flame No Game
@proproduct · 38,618
#76
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,633
#77
Design Jam
@design_jam · 6,728
#78
#ФФДД2Д
@ffdd2d · 8,935
#79
Wannabe like Rozov
@wannabelikerozov17feb · 16,042
#80
Трудно быть Руденко
@cxlogic · 9,040
#81
Дизайн-переводчик
@design_translator · 20,549
#82
Канал Ильи Бирмана
@ilyabirman_channel · 14,098
#83
Дима из Глубины
@bananamonkeyfit · 4,661
#84
Alexcouncil⚡
@alexcouncil · 13,516
#85
Тибурон
@tiburon_research · 5,701
#86
Derkach is creating...
@DesignCraftsPeople · 1,115
#87
Ameton про e-com в фудтехе
@ametonfoodtech · 3,583
#88
Pragmatica | Senior Designer
@senior_designer_pragmatica · 17,385
#89
дизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,106
#90
Веб дизайн в Figma
@figmaweb · 39,821
#91
Потребительское поведение; факты и тренды
@c_behavior · 8,928
#92
UI Muse 🔥
@ui_muse · 5,082
#93
Job for Designers
@fordesigner · 25,347
#94
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 104,980
#95
Local Talent | Design
@local_talent · 9,096
#96
Как это сверстано
@kaketosverstano · 8,299
#97
Бенчмарки
@benchmarkee · 4,800
#98

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,524
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,066
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,914
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,012
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
UI/UX Designer
@uxidesign · 20,425
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,409
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 62,939
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,320
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,736
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Оди
@awdee · 33,222
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,316
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
Дизайн-переводчик
@design_translator · 20,549
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
UI_UX inspiration
@uiux_design · 20,833
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 85,910
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
дизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,106
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 104,980
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,121
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
СПNЗЖУ DESIGN
@thedesigner · 29,650
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Fresh Product Manager
@FreshProductGo · 19,880
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 43,135
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Job for Designers
@fordesigner · 25,347
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Easy Figma
@easyfigma · 25,170
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,633
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Веб дизайн в Figma
@figmaweb · 39,821
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UX Horn 🌀” (@uxhorn), 21,243 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uxhorn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.