Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дизайн Домашка

Channel

Дизайн Домашка

@designdomashka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,942subscribers

-148 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725995504
TypeChannel
Username@designdomashka
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/designdomashka

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,94212,09012,0166 August 2026 — 12,090 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,090 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,083 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,082 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,078 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,078 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,077 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,065 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,061 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,056 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,049 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,044 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,038 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,032 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,020 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,017 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,008 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,003 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,006 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,000 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,001 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,003 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,998 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,996 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,986 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,966 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,959 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,946 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,942 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,920–12,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:1811,942-4
14 Sept 2026, 02:5711,946-13
12 Sept 2026, 09:5811,959-7
10 Sept 2026, 07:3511,966-20
7 Sept 2026, 01:0111,986-10
4 Sept 2026, 07:2111,996-2
2 Sept 2026, 21:1811,998-5
1 Sept 2026, 16:5512,003+2
31 Aug 2026, 20:0612,001+1
29 Aug 2026, 17:1212,000-6
28 Aug 2026, 15:3312,006+3
27 Aug 2026, 16:4412,003-5
26 Aug 2026, 18:3712,008-9
25 Aug 2026, 18:0912,017-3
24 Aug 2026, 17:3712,020-12
23 Aug 2026, 01:2712,032-6
21 Aug 2026, 15:2712,038-6
20 Aug 2026, 12:0812,044-5
19 Aug 2026, 12:3612,049-7
18 Aug 2026, 14:3612,056first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 18 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 11,942 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held22 (18 February 202626 August 2026)
Views total2,770
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 40m
Average length
16m 42s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,036 reactions across 22 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
70868.3%
🔥827.92%
😁817.82%
❤‍🔥747.14%
🤯292.80%
🤔212.03%
😢171.64%
80.772%
👏50.483%
😱30.29%
🙏30.29%
🤩30.29%
👍20.193%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,036 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,240 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

За кофе с дизайн-директорами только и разговоров, что половина любой in-house команды — это луддиты, которые боятся, что AI заменит их функции. Внедрение происходит безумно тяжело, и очень часто изменения блокируются самими дизайнерами. Чем выше грейд, тем меньше хочется переключаться в формат джуна, когда тебе нужно заново учить софт. А от обилия людей в ленте, которые уже все AIAIAI — уже подгорает. Как мне кажется

25

24 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,530 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✈️ UIX Задача августа ✈️ Каникулы закончились и пора снова прокачивать свои дизайн-навыки. Вот вам задачка для разминки: ———————————————— Авиакомпания хочет переосмыслить выбор мест в самолёте. Сегодня пассажир выбирает конкретное свободное кресло и оплачивает его. Но его реальный комфорт зависит не только от самого места, а от того, что произойдёт вокруг него к моменту вылета. Спроектируйте новый подход к выбору

23🤔15❤‍🔥5

18 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,200 views63 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

§UX. Сокращение времени в сценариях. Хорошая штука, если весь функционал отполирован, а конверсию надо крутить дальше. Как всегда, в коротком формате сгруппировал приёмы и методы. Рассказал, как, используя знания юзера о системе, можно убирать часть шагов, делать их проще или выполнять за него. Не удержался и снова поругал метод персон, который хорош только на стадии, когда мы вообще ничего не знаем о пользователе.

55🔥5🙏3

13 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC≈4,510 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Всем привет, мы снова выходим в эфир И на связи ⚡️ Женя, основатель дизайнерс. Уже как год я вышел с текучки дизайнерс, чтобы отдохнуть, набраться сил и свежим взглядом посмотреть на это все со стороны и прикинуть куда можно двигаться дальше. Конечно не обошлось и без новых проектов и я впервые вышел за рамки дизайна начиная с 2016 года. Кому интересно чем занимался напишите в лс, тут не про это) Нас не было почти

13

10 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈3,800 views95 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Знаю ли я, что любой дизайнер-удаленщик лихо совмещает свои бытовые задачи внутри рабочего графика? Конечно. Но когда садишься в самолет и случайно встречаешь своего дизайнера, который в рабочее время летит на море, чтобы поработать потом пару дней с яхты на мобильном интернете... Как говорится, ноль осуждения ) просто сделайте все хорошо и вовремя. Но лучше бы я про это не знал. Надо вам записать что-то про контек

😁7216🤔4🤩2👏1

8 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈3,750 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

В продолжении поста с видео про Intent-Driven Interface и новую роль дизайнера при проектировании пододных AI-систем с динамичным интерфейсом. https://www.monogram.ai/ подняли неплохой раунд и максимально разгоняют эту тему в своих интерью. Если коротко — они строят систему, которая под ваш запрос генерит привычный интерфейс, по которому вы уже понимаете как действовать в сценарии. Посмотрите видео, как раз примерно

14❤‍🔥4

3 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC≈3,530 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вакансия из интернета, найдено случайно, но очень отзывается, особенно если убрать хайповое «AI-диза» (это как писать фтошоп-диз или фигма-диз) и UI заменить на UX. Сейчас поясню почему: Все чаще среди нанимающих арт-директоров встречаю мнение, что новый формат собеседования ux-дизайнера это вайтбординг с использованием нейронки прямо на встрече. Зачем переживать, что кандидат тебя обманет и пришлет решение от нейр

🤯299👍2😢1

24 Jun 2026, 12:15 UTC≈3,120 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Подход Intent-Driven Interface. В предыдущем посте закинул вам тему на подумать, как быть когда в работе исчезают привычные этапы создания макетов, а ваша роль — описание системы в которой дизайнер фактически создает визуальный язык. А сами шаги и элементы на странице собираются уже под потребность при помощи AI... Ловите короткое видео с деталями: в чем суть подхода и как это работает в примерах. #edu Не стесняемс

30🔥5😱1

23 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,560 views64 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Я конечно очень хочу написать вам пост в котором расскажу, как мы нейронки в дизайн внедряли… и как это все изменило (или нет). Но это позже... Просто сейчас приходится разбираться с гораздо более сложно штукой. Представьте проект, в котором дизайнер не проектирует сценарии напрямую. Внутри проекта огромное количество функционала и ролей, есть дизайн система, но нет вообще макетов. AI во время взаимодействия с пользо

44❤‍🔥18😱2

20 Jun 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,440 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

На старт, внимание… скоро начинается RDC 2026! Конкурс-легенда. В 2019 у нас работал победитель очередного тура — я даже не представляю как нам удалось выиграть эту гонку среди HR, которые кружили вокруг его портфолио. И тогда же я вел оффлайн-батл, финал RDC, когда дизайнеры создавали дизайн сайтов в прямом эфире, прямо за мониторами на сцене. Сейчас участие онлайн и есть возможность пройтись по всем задачам. Три т

17

19 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC≈2,660 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🐤🐤🐤 Разбор, первая часть. UIX Задача про расставание с коллегами. Эта задача про роль и функцию, которые закреплены за отдельным человеком (интересно, мы также будем переживать когда будут отключать твой любимый бот?)... Наша проблема не в том, что человек покидает компанию, а в том, что функция/роль может перераспределяться на кого-то нового, на нескольких людей, и даже лично на вас как пользователя. Круто, если р

15👏4

12 Jun 2026, 07:31 UTC≈3,050 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✅ UIX Задача про расставание с коллегами / решения. Файл с решениями участников тут. В среднем на задачу участники потратили времени примерно одинаково — 2-3 часа, но уровень проработки довольно разный. Видно, что некоторые участники довольно эмоционально восприняли тему 😅💀 — "ушел так ушел, отпуская- отпусти"... что несомненно отразилось на копирайте и выборе цветовой темы. 1) смотрим задачу 2) прикидываем в голо

19😁8

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @designdomashka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2026, 10:28 UTCAnonymous Poll348 voters

Давайте скорее домашку!

  1. На креатив с лого8%
  2. На UX макета35%
  3. На UX сценария44%
  4. На UI макета42%
  5. (хочу посмотреть ответы)21%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Саня Кво: дизайн, развитие и study kvo
@study_kvo · 25,327
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 78,866
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,724
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Yodiz x Zubkov
@yodizlife · 23,544
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 September 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,435
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Дизайн-биржа 💵
@designbirzha · 52,732
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,994
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,525
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Job for Designers
@fordesigner · 24,592
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 42,715
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 63,360
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Вакансии для Дизайнеров
@design_jobs_uxui · 25,628
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
perasperadastra ✱ сучков саша
@perasperagram · 38,560
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Вакансии для дизайнеров
@designer_vacancies · 22,728
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 106,056
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,316
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Easy Figma
@easyfigma · 25,498
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг
@mutimdigital · 30,261
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 80,069
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Учебник дизайнера
@dsgn_tutorial · 82,746
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Точка входа
@bbe_jobs · 25,325
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,350
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Оди
@awdee · 33,565
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,638
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дизайн Домашка” (@designdomashka), 11,942 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designdomashka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.