Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дизайн Домашка

Channel

Дизайн Домашка

@designdomashka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,810subscribers

-280 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725995504
TypeChannel
Username@designdomashka
DescriptionКанал ведет дизайн-директор CreativePeople Александр Ковальский. Дизайн Домашка — проект dsgners.ru c заданиями для прокачки и полезными UX-лайфхаками для работы продуктовых дизайнеров. Реклама: @design_manager_bot Мы в реестре: https://vk.cc/cG5c71
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/designdomashka

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,81012,09011,9506 August 2026 — 12,090 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,090 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,083 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,082 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,078 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,078 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,077 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,073 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,070 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,065 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,061 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,056 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,049 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,044 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,038 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,032 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,020 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,017 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,008 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,003 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,006 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,000 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,001 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,003 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,998 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,996 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,986 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,966 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,959 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,946 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,942 subscribers27 September 2026 — 11,928 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,914 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,897 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,880 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,874 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,877 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,873 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,872 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,870 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,868 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,865 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,858 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,856 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,849 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,843 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,841 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,839 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,838 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,837 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,836 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,835 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,832 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,827 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,824 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,819 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,813 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,810 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -280. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,768–12,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 00:4611,810-3
4 Nov 2026, 21:5811,813-6
3 Nov 2026, 18:3911,819-5
2 Nov 2026, 20:2811,824-3
1 Nov 2026, 23:4611,827-5
31 Oct 2026, 23:0511,832-3
30 Oct 2026, 22:3011,835-1
29 Oct 2026, 19:4611,836-1
28 Oct 2026, 22:3711,837-1
27 Oct 2026, 23:3511,838-1
27 Oct 2026, 00:0511,839-2
26 Oct 2026, 01:1611,841-2
25 Oct 2026, 00:1611,843-6
24 Oct 2026, 00:4611,849-7
22 Oct 2026, 23:3111,856-2
21 Oct 2026, 19:3911,858-7
20 Oct 2026, 18:3711,865-3
19 Oct 2026, 20:2711,868-2
18 Oct 2026, 21:2711,870-2
17 Oct 2026, 18:4011,872first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 11,810 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.882%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held27 (18 February 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total4,080
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
280
Videos
119
Links
275

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 14m
Average length
16m 52s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,177 reactions across 26 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤81569.2%
🔥937.90%
❤‍🔥897.56%
😁847.14%
🤯322.72%
🤔221.87%
😢171.44%
⚡80.68%
👏50.425%
😱40.34%
🙏30.255%
🤩30.255%
👍20.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.70%
1 of 27 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,710
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,990
over 26 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwKnS7W129 September 202629 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 22 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

22 Oct 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,680 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

#edu Принес вам свое выступление с Sber UX conf: про проектирование интерфейсов для проектов у которых под капотом AI. Тезисы можно почитать в прошлом посте. Про нелинейные сценарии и проекты, в которых система, а не только пользователь, сама является инициатором изменений. Публичные лекции — это чаще всего такой финал большой работы. Когда много чего уже сделал, накопил оыпт косяков, ошибок и удачных решений, приме…

❤25

8 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,400 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⚡️👀🔥 / UX Workshop / Тут должен был быть анонс моего большого двухнедельного UX-воркшопа для middle/senior продуктовых дизайнеров, который мы с командой дизайнерс запускаем в октябре, но... ... пока я собирался с мыслями как вам рассказать про воркшоп, за один день после анонса в соседнем чате все места участников с домашками закончились 😳. Отличная собралась группа — опытные продуктовые дизайнеры, 20-25 человек и …

❤‍🔥8🔥3

29 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC≈2,710 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwKnS7WPhoto

А что, если логотип Авито можно встретить не только на экране? ⚡️ Целый год мы придумывали и разрабатывали линейку предметов, в которых логотип компании стал частью дизайна. Где-то его легко заметить с первого взгляда, а где-то понадобится посмотреть на вещь под определённым углом, чтобы его обнаружить. При этом каждый предмет получился практичным. Нам было важно создавать вещи, которыми действительно хочется польз…

29 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,170 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

19 сентября открывал форум Design Prosmotr лекцией про UX в проектах с ии под капотом. Тема сложная, если рассказывать по делу, а не хайпить. Но я очень бодрый спикер, мне обычно хватает энергетики 😜 говорить простым языком о сложных вещах. Особенно, если рассказывать кейсы в которых сам участвовал. Кто-то из зрителей выложил на дизайнерс статью по итогам лекции: с описанием темы и тезисами. Вот за это респект. 👍 та…

❤24🔥7

4 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC≈4,420 views34 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

§ В интерфейсах, которые основаны на AI-процессах, ошибка перестает быть состоянием (да/нет). Тут есть фундаментальное отличие оттого, как мы привыкли проектировать классический интерфейс. Принес вам слайд со вчерашнейлекции UX SBER CONF. Кроме того, что его сфотографировали максимальное количество человек, он примечателен тем, что примерно показывает как использование AI-агентов в обычном интерфейсе запускает Shado…

❤30❤‍🔥4

26 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈4,290 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026

За кофе с дизайн-директорами только и разговоров, что половина любой in-house команды — это луддиты, которые боятся, что AI заменит их функции. Внедрение происходит безумно тяжело, и очень часто изменения блокируются самими дизайнерами. Чем выше грейд, тем меньше хочется переключаться в формат джуна, когда тебе нужно заново учить софт. А от обилия людей в ленте, которые уже все AIAIAI — уже подгорает. Как мне кажется…

❤32

24 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈3,080 views48 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

✈️ UIX Задача августа ✈️ Каникулы закончились и пора снова прокачивать свои дизайн-навыки. Вот вам задачка для разминки: ———————————————— Авиакомпания хочет переосмыслить выбор мест в самолёте. Сегодня пассажир выбирает конкретное свободное кресло и оплачивает его. Но его реальный комфорт зависит не только от самого места, а от того, что произойдёт вокруг него к моменту вылета. Спроектируйте новый подход к выбору…

❤25🤔16❤‍🔥7

18 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈3,190 views69 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

§UX. Сокращение времени в сценариях. Хорошая штука, если весь функционал отполирован, а конверсию надо крутить дальше. Как всегда, в коротком формате сгруппировал приёмы и методы. Рассказал, как, используя знания юзера о системе, можно убирать часть шагов, делать их проще или выполнять за него. Не удержался и снова поругал метод персон, который хорош только на стадии, когда мы вообще ничего не знаем о пользователе.…

❤61🔥5🙏3

13 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC≈5,310 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Всем привет, мы снова выходим в эфир И на связи ⚡️ Женя, основатель дизайнерс. Уже как год я вышел с текучки дизайнерс, чтобы отдохнуть, набраться сил и свежим взглядом посмотреть на это все со стороны и прикинуть куда можно двигаться дальше. Конечно не обошлось и без новых проектов и я впервые вышел за рамки дизайна начиная с 2016 года. Кому интересно чем занимался напишите в лс, тут не про это) Нас не было почти …

❤13

10 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈4,260 views99 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Знаю ли я, что любой дизайнер-удаленщик лихо совмещает свои бытовые задачи внутри рабочего графика? Конечно. Но когда садишься в самолет и случайно встречаешь своего дизайнера, который в рабочее время летит на море, чтобы поработать потом пару дней с яхты на мобильном интернете... Как говорится, ноль осуждения ) просто сделайте все хорошо и вовремя. Но лучше бы я про это не знал. Надо вам записать что-то про контек…

😁75❤17🤔4🤩2👏1

8 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈4,290 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

В продолжении поста с видео про Intent-Driven Interface и новую роль дизайнера при проектировании пододных AI-систем с динамичным интерфейсом. https://www.monogram.ai/ подняли неплохой раунд и максимально разгоняют эту тему в своих интерью. Если коротко — они строят систему, которая под ваш запрос генерит привычный интерфейс, по которому вы уже понимаете как действовать в сценарии. Посмотрите видео, как раз примерно…

❤15❤‍🔥5

3 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC≈3,990 views44 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вакансия из интернета, найдено случайно, но очень отзывается, особенно если убрать хайповое «AI-диза» (это как писать фтошоп-диз или фигма-диз) и UI заменить на UX. Сейчас поясню почему: Все чаще среди нанимающих арт-директоров встречаю мнение, что новый формат собеседования ux-дизайнера это вайтбординг с использованием нейронки прямо на встрече. Зачем переживать, что кандидат тебя обманет и пришлет решение от нейр…

🤯32❤9👍2😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @designdomashka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @designdomashka as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
9 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2026, 10:28 UTCAnonymous Poll348 voters

Давайте скорее домашку!

  1. На креатив с лого8%
  2. На UX макета35%
  3. На UX сценария44%
  4. На UI макета42%
  5. (хочу посмотреть ответы)21%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Саня Кво: дизайн, развитие и study kvo
@study_kvo · 24,427
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
дизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,112
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 81,542
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,529
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
UI/UX Designer
@uxidesign · 20,443
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Yodiz x Zubkov
@yodizlife · 23,846
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 September 2026
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,015
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
UX/UI — UPROCK AWARDS
@uprockdesign · 21,286
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
UX Horn 🌀
@uxhorn · 21,246
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,418
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Дизайн-биржа 💵
@designbirzha · 52,119
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Джун Дизайнер - вакансии
@junior_designers · 20,737
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 September 2026
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,452
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,071
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Job for Designers
@fordesigner · 25,314
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 43,121
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 62,958
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Вакансии для Дизайнеров
@design_jobs_uxui · 26,596
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
perasperadastra ✱ сучков саша
@perasperagram · 38,111
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Вакансии для дизайнеров
@designer_vacancies · 23,545
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 105,050
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,311
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Easy Figma
@easyfigma · 25,175
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг
@mutimdigital · 29,997
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дизайн Домашка” (@designdomashka), 11,810 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designdomashka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.