Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг

Channel

mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг

@mutimdigital

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,272subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001260333765
TypeChannel
Username@mutimdigital
DescriptionПо дизайну и рекламе — @mutimconnect Чат — t.me/+oGDfMwh1sERlMTUy Ютуб — youtube.com/@mutimdigital Кейсы — behance.net/mutimdigital Зареган в РКН — https://clck.ru/3Gak7q
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mutimdigital

Growth

30,21330,28630,249.57 August 2026 — 30,285 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,285 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,286 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,271 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,261 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,252 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,245 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,239 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,237 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,226 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,216 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,213 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,217 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,272 subscribers30,2727 August 202622 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 15 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,202–30,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 00:0730,272+55
20 Aug 2026, 19:4630,217+4
19 Aug 2026, 21:0330,213-3
18 Aug 2026, 18:3530,216-10
17 Aug 2026, 16:5530,226-11
16 Aug 2026, 08:1530,237-2
14 Aug 2026, 21:4630,239-6
13 Aug 2026, 13:2630,245-7
12 Aug 2026, 11:2330,252-9
10 Aug 2026, 11:2330,261-10
9 Aug 2026, 14:2130,271-15
8 Aug 2026, 17:3530,286+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:4530,285no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:3430,285first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.2%
avg views ÷ 30,272 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,400
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 June 202620 August 2026)
Views total103,620
Reactions total3,317
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
391
Videos
7
Links
86

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 21s
Average length
6m 11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,181 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,83067.3%
👍6729.36%
🤔6549.11%
😁4606.41%
🔥3374.69%
😭931.30%
🐳731.02%
👎590.822%
30.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
650
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 20 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
308
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mutimdigital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈4,650 views211 reactions308 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Вся история дизайна: Coca-cola, Sprite, Fanta — новое видео на Ютубе Однажды мне стало очень интересно узнать, как выглядела топовая газировка раньше, и сравнить с тем, как она выглядит сейчас. Поэтому я взял и сделал видео по теме. Вот такая вот захватывающая история. Приятного просмотра. 👉 https://youtu.be/NR0O8IVa-c8

164👍20🤔16🔥11

17 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,970 views264 reactions164 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Супер-игра — август 2026 На этот раз вы точно не сможете угадать тему нового видео по нескольким кадрам. Я качественно скрыл все намёки.

187🤔47👍29🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC≈11,100 views526 reactions56 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Они обновили логотип Хотел написать толковую заметку, но напишу хайповую и бестолковую. Инста обновила логотип, а если быть точнее — текстовую часть. Шрифт очень смелый, с отсылкой на рукописный оригинал. Не знаю, как воспринимают логотип пользователи латиницы, но я напрягаюсь от такой буквы «s» и «r». Вместо первой я вообще вижу дельту. Правда, нужно отдать должное: именно эти буквы прикольно рифмуются друг с друг

387😭74👍34🐳14👎10🔥7

9 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈12,300 views311 reactions39 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Уведомление об отсутствии уведомлений В шторке свежего чистого андроида можно увидеть сообщение о том, что все уведомления прочитаны. Вроде бы абсолютно бесполезная инфа. Если уведомлений нет, то нафиг мне об этом писать? И так понятно, что их нет. С другой стороны, это может помочь снизить уровень тревожности у тревожников. Вы и сами знаете тему с включённым утюгом и незакрытой входной дверью. Было бы интересно у

🤔19183👍29🔥6👎1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈10,700 views454 reactions11 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Ищите плюсы в любом дизайне Зрительница переделала афишу мероприятий. Получилось симпатично, но где-то по пути потерялось много плюсов оригинала, которые можно было оставить. По такому случае записал для вас видео с глубоким анализом оригинала и моей переделкой. Напишите, пожалуйста, как вам формат коротких видосов чисто для Телеги. По сути, можно было бы запилить полноценный материал на Ютуб, но там любят хайп. А

354👍62🔥19🤔16😭3

5 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC≈11,300 views84 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Жёстко смотрю на ваш дизайн Скидывайте свой дизайн с коротким описанием в комментарии к этой записи. Баннер, логотип, упаковку, сайт — что хочете. Файл и описание должны быть в одном комментарии. Отправляйте не более одной работы. Смотрю: jpeg, png или ссылки на Behance, Dprofile. Не смотрю: ссылки на другие ресурсы, figma-файлы и pdf. Самые интересные работы прокомментирую сегодня в 19:00 по МСК. Внимание! Если в

65👍10🔥9

31 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC≈11,700 views283 reactions5 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Как делать дизайн для такого продукта?! Карточка товара демонстрирует бильярдный кий, но товар настолько слабо узнаваемый сам по себе, что разглядеть его почти нереально. Если показать кий крупно, фиг поймёшь, что это именно он (лично я не пойму). Если сделать упор на бильярдный стол, можно подумать, что продаётся бильярдный стол. Даже на чистом белом фоне кий не очень узнаваемый, особенно в мелком размере. Пожалуй,

🤔17389👍16🐳5

28 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC≈11,900 views672 reactions6 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Да, нет, наверное Если закрыть вкладку в окне редактирования на Ютубе, выскочит такое вот уведомление. Глядя на текст, понимаю, что ничего не понимаю. «Подтвердите действие на ...» В этом предложении мне прямо указывают, что я должен именно подтвердить действие, то есть нажать «ОК». Потому что подтвердить отрицательно — это вообще как?! «Не сохранять изменения?» В этом предложении мне задают вопрос с частицей «не»

456😁147🐳34👍15🤔9🔥6😭4👎1

28 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈11,200 views94 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Основы UX/UI-дизайна В последнем длинном видео я рассказывал про дизайн-студию Perasperadastra. В комментах оказалось много людей, которые их уже знают. Писали, что материалы у ребят действительно полезные. Так что поделюсь и здесь. Ребята сделали бесплатный курс по дизайну, где собрали свой опыт за 10 лет работы. Всего 12 уроков: UX/UI, Figma, нейросети и даже трудоустройство. Всё по делу и без лишней теории. Мат

74🔥10👍8👎2

25 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC≈11,800 views418 reactions5 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Разбираю скандальный дизайн от студии Лебедева Чисто ради хайпа вырезал и склеил для вас кусок с последнего стрима. Посмотрите, если вдруг пропустили. Если не пропустили, всё равно посмотрите. Не каждый день видимся всё-таки.

320🤔47👍36🔥13🐳2

22 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC≈14,500 views250 reactions5 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Неочевидная проблема плашек Одна из полезных функций плашек — структурирование инфы. Если элементы не собираются в стройную конструкцию, прямоугольные границы вокруг могут спасти ситуацию. Но из-за такого применения часто случается ситуация, при которой нарушается главное и чуть ли не единственное правило в дизайне: правило внутреннего и внешнего. Внутри плашки всё разнесено по уголкам. Инфа аккуратно стоит на свои

183👍46🔥16🤔5

18 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈15,100 views352 reactions5 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Спорное кадрирование Автор оригинала решил показать только четвертинку пиццы, вероятно, для того, чтобы мы могли лучше рассмотреть состав и детали на ней. Проблема в том, что четвертинка пиццы не информативна. Огромную часть занимает чисто корочка. Вообще, состав любого блюда сложно понять по мелкой фотке. С ним помогает текстовая часть. Поэтому, если картинка не помогает, пусть хотя бы будет приятна визуально. А вы

261🔥45👎20🤔15👍7🐳2😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mutimdigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mutimdigital edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Што такое фотошоп?
@photosed · 107,484
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Што за шрифт?
@wtfont · 130,053
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг” (@mutimdigital), 30,272 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mutimdigital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.