Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт

Channel

Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт

@designvorkel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,143subscribers

-113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622845623
TypeChannel
Username@designvorkel
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/designvorkel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,14310,25610,199.57 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,240 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,232 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,235 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,233 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,232 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,233 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,227 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,221 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,207 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,196 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,191 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,185 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,180 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,172 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,167 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,159 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,162 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,158 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,151 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,143 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,144 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,147 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,143 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,126–10,273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:1810,143-4
16 Sept 2026, 04:4010,147+3
14 Sept 2026, 11:0010,144+1
12 Sept 2026, 17:5510,143-8
10 Sept 2026, 20:1710,151-7
7 Sept 2026, 21:5610,158-4
4 Sept 2026, 23:5810,162+3
3 Sept 2026, 09:5410,159-8
2 Sept 2026, 05:2310,167-5
1 Sept 2026, 06:3710,172-8
30 Aug 2026, 05:2810,180-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:5710,185-6
28 Aug 2026, 02:4610,191-5
27 Aug 2026, 04:1510,196-11
26 Aug 2026, 07:1110,207-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:0310,211-10
24 Aug 2026, 00:4210,221-8
22 Aug 2026, 08:4610,229+2
20 Aug 2026, 22:4310,227-6
19 Aug 2026, 19:5610,233first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.36%
avg views ÷ 10,143 subscribers
Avg views / post
949
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held30 (9 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total10,441
Reactions total243
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

994 reactions across 30 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
34034.2%
🔥12212.3%
😁929.26%
💯797.95%
👍676.74%
custom 5465309415592715918666.64%
😭555.53%
💘464.63%
🥰151.51%
🤣121.21%
custom 5467371687089562976111.11%
🕊111.11%
🤓111.11%
🌚101.01%
🤝101.01%
🙏80.805%
🤪70.704%
🤨60.604%
👀40.402%
💔40.402%
12 further kinds181.81%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 994 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC352 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ну и немного итогов конференции ТОК от Точка Банк. Начну даже не с инсайтов и выступлений. Первое, что запомнилось — какое-то невероятное количество красивых и приятных людей вокруг. Встретил много знакомых. Например, Олега Бухтиярова, который делает scrn.gallery, ребят, которые занимаются сетками Telegram-каналов, ещё кучу людей из совершенно разных бизнесов. В итоге между выступлениями было не менее интересно, че

5🔥3custom 54653094155927159183custom 54673716870895629763💘2🤝2🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC526 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Что бы ты посоветовал делать человеку, который попадает в большой энтерпрайс, на хорошую позицию, за хорошую зп, на интересный проект, но… все время отдаешь компании, и не хватает прям много времени на свое дело или сайдхасл. Как относиться к такой работе? Что ты думаешь про карьеру в застарелом энтерпрайсе, где к ИИ воркфлоу еще не дошли? Как не отпустить свое развитие и идти в ногу с технологиями и прогрессом, рабо

🔥8🥰4custom 546530941559271591831👏1

27 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC857 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥96custom 54653094155927159182💘1🕊1🤓1🤝1

27 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC731 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10🔥6🤪3💘2custom 54653094155927159182🕊1

27 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC782 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня весь день на ТОК — конференции для предпринимателей от Точка Банк. Мероприятие проходит в Доме культуры «ГЭС-2». Пространство, конечно, невероятно красивое. И это не совсем конференция в привычном формате, где ты весь день сидишь перед одной сценой. Здесь параллельно идут лекции, антидискуссии, мастер-классы, разборы реальных бизнес-кейсов, мастермайнды по продажам и нетворкинг. Темы максимально прикладные

9🔥4👍3custom 54653094155927159182💘1🕊1🤝1

26 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC983 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Лучшая настольная проф литература для дизайнера? А я похож на того, кто шарит за такое?)) Ну ладно, пару штук назвать могу Что стоит хотя бы открыть «Типографика и вёрстка» и «Пользовательский интерфейс». Думаю, они в целом закроют всю базу. А вообще можно просто заглянуть на сайт Бюро и посмотреть, что у них там ещё есть А дальше база у каждого своя Если хочется качнуть креативное мышление и вот это все, то купит

👍14🔥83🤓3custom 54653094155927159183❤‍🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,090 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Года четыре назад я сильно переоценивал дизайн Мне казалось, что хороший продуктовый дизайнер должен докопаться до идеального решения, провести исследования, продумать все сценарии, собрать красивый интерфейс и убедительно его защитить. Сейчас я думаю немного иначе За последние годы я успел поработать в больших компаниях, уйти из найма, поделать свои проекты и снова вернуться в большую продуктовую команду. И сильн

😁139🔥5custom 54653094155927159182👍1💘1🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,140 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

5custom 54653094155927159181

25 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,160 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Как думаешь, к чему в итоге приведет ИИ в рамках продуктового дизайна? В ближайшем будущем все дизайнеры перестанут открывать Фигму и будут чисто сидеть в клоде? Да думаю ни к чему такому не приведёт) Дизайн в первую очередь всё ещё про дизайн, продуктовый дизайн — про работу с продуктом, а это гораздо шире, чем нагенерить интерфейс Куча ньюансов в работе из-за которых фигму невозможно исключить из ежедневной рутин

11💘4custom 54653094155927159183🤝2

24 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,270 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Экономику штормит, ИИ трансформирует целые отрасли и каждый месяц появляются новые инструменты. IT меняется со скоростью ветра. Для альпинистов ветер и туман — это всегда опасность, непредсказуемость и одновременно возможность развить скорость реакции и отладить работу команды. Каждое восхождение становится новой пересборкой себя. Практикум PRO и АльпИндустрия разобрались, как наслаждаться маршрутом, даже если вашу

6🤨6💯2🔥2custom 54653094155927159181

22 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,550 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Что думаешь про Яндекс с точки зрения профессиональной карьеры? Какую команду рекомендуешь, почему? Что бы там не говорили про работу в компании, но я реально советую В Яндексе ты накапливаешь свой профессиональный капитал. Ну деньги ты там тоже, конечно, зарабатываешь, но не такие, как можешь зарабатывать в какой-нибудь другой компании, где люди годами сидят и не понятно, чем занимаются. И в основном к Яндексу над

🔥15🥰7custom 546530941559271591843🤣3🕊2

16 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,920 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Задай мне анонимный вопрос Любой, абсолютно. На часть из них я отвечу прям в боте, то есть ответ увидишь только ты, а если будут интересные для всех, то отвечу отдельным постом в канале) Задать вопрос Ахх, запах начальной школы, погнали!)

🤓7🔥32👍1🕊1custom 54653094155927159181

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @designvorkel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 10:28 UTCAnonymous Poll243 voters

Че думаете про это?

  1. Если вижу работу, могу оставить комменты по ней19%
  2. Просто прохожу мимо53%
  3. Открыт к любой ос по моим работам41%
  4. Посмотреть ответы16%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Jun 2026, 11:17 UTCAnonymous Poll446 voters

Что чаще делаешь на работе?

  1. Продуктовые штуки, логику, все завязано на метриках15%
  2. Концепчу, создаю что-то с нуля, рисую24%
  3. Все))39%
  4. Посмотреть ответы22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,894
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,525
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,435
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,994
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
perasperadastra ✱ сучков саша
@perasperagram · 38,560
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,902
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 42,715
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг
@mutimdigital · 30,261
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 78,866
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,724
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,638
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
Bang Bang Education
@bbe_school · 25,425
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,316
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Job for Designers
@fordesigner · 24,592
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Дизайн-снайпер
@designsniper · 28,081
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Product Management & AI
@ruspm · 25,204
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Easy Figma
@easyfigma · 25,498
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
Дашич, беги🚀
@dashich_begi · 37,575
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,378
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Дизайн-биржа 💵
@designbirzha · 52,732
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 86,848
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Точка входа
@bbe_jobs · 25,325
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта
@productdo · 24,067
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Вакансии для Дизайнеров
@design_jobs_uxui · 25,628
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт” (@designvorkel), 10,143 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designvorkel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.