Авторский канал Воркель Влада, предпринимателя и eх дизайнера в Авито, Яндекс и Сбер.
Пишу честно и провокационно на темы, о которых другие молчат
Реклама — @vorkel_manager
https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/679bafe84fb9d46696be8448
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 89 days, net -199. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,027–10,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 08:15
10,057
-1
3 Nov 2026, 07:30
10,058
-1
2 Nov 2026, 10:26
10,059
-5
1 Nov 2026, 12:58
10,064
-6
31 Oct 2026, 11:55
10,070
-3
30 Oct 2026, 09:34
10,073
-1
29 Oct 2026, 12:56
10,074
-4
28 Oct 2026, 15:05
10,078
-6
27 Oct 2026, 15:58
10,084
+2
26 Oct 2026, 12:27
10,082
-3
25 Oct 2026, 10:45
10,085
-3
24 Oct 2026, 10:25
10,088
-1
23 Oct 2026, 08:54
10,089
+2
22 Oct 2026, 10:48
10,087
+2
21 Oct 2026, 03:28
10,085
-1
20 Oct 2026, 04:57
10,086
+2
19 Oct 2026, 03:28
10,084
+2
18 Oct 2026, 05:29
10,082
-4
17 Oct 2026, 08:58
10,086
+1
16 Oct 2026, 07:05
10,085
first reading
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 10,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026
Posts held
45 (9 June 2026 – 20 October 2026)
Views total
5,570
Reactions total
122
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
306
Videos
47
Links
190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,553 reactions across 45 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
511
32.9%
custom 5465309415592715918
165
10.6%
😁
152
9.79%
🔥
151
9.72%
💯
129
8.31%
👍
87
5.60%
😭
64
4.12%
custom 5467371687089562976
51
3.28%
💘
44
2.83%
🤣
35
2.25%
💔
23
1.48%
🥰
23
1.48%
🕊
12
0.773%
🤓
11
0.708%
🤝
11
0.708%
🌚
10
0.644%
🤨
10
0.644%
🙏
8
0.515%
✍
7
0.451%
❤🔥
7
0.451%
18 further kinds
42
2.70%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,553 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Чат поддержки — это кладбище навигации
Всё, для чего команда не смогла придумать нормальное место, отправляется в чат. Где чек? Напишите боту. Как изменить адрес? Напишите боту. Почему списались деньги? Вы уже поняли.
На презентации это выглядит как единое окно решения проблем. В жизни ты каждый раз начинаешь разговор с роботом, который просит выбрать тему из списка. То есть мы взяли обычное меню, сделали его медле…
Как принимают продуктовые решения в VK Видео
У большого продукта нет одной честной метрики. Иногда ради нормального сценария приходится сознательно проиграть в отдельной цифре, чтобы пользователь в итоге чаще находил нужное и хотел вернуться.
Вадим Дорохов, который отвечает за опыт зрителя VK Видео, рассказывает, как команда работает с этим внутри сервиса. Не только запускает новые функции, а пытается понять, станов…
Красиво — это тоже функция
Когда на проекте заканчиваются аргументы, кто-нибудь обязательно говорит: «Ну это же просто визуал». Как будто визуал лежит сверху продукта декоративной салфеткой и вообще ни на что не влияет.
Но человек ещё не знает, удобно ли приложение. Он сначала видит его. По цвету, типографике, плотности и анимации за секунду решает — этому банку можно доверить деньги, этот сервис живой, эту штуку х…
Программа лояльности больше не про лояльность
Почти в любом магазине у товара теперь две цены. Нормальная — если установил приложение, зарегистрировался, назвал номер телефона и разрешил присылать тебе говно. И цена для лохов — если просто хочешь купить йогурт и уйти.
Это уже не скидка. Скидка — когда тебя награждают за то, что ты часто приходишь. А тут тебя сначала штрафуют, а потом разрешают купить товар по обычн…
Насмотренность делает жизнь хуже
Когда начинаешь заниматься дизайном, кажется, что насмотренность нужна, чтобы делать красиво. Ну типа больше посмотрел хороших работ — лучше нарисовал.
Но есть побочка. Ты начинаешь видеть вообще всё — кривой логотип на вывеске, ужасный ремонт в дорогом ЖК, кнопку, которая прыгает, меню, где название блюда не помещается, и вот это всё. Человек рядом спокойно живёт, а ты уже мысленно …
Большая кнопка не создаёт желание
Если люди не нажимают на целевое действие, его начинают двигать выше, красить ярче и увеличивать. Потом добавляют липкую панель. Потом попап. В какой-то момент весь экран уже буквально кричит «КУПИ», а конверсия всё равно какая-то грустная.
Потому что проблема часто не в том, что человек не заметил кнопку. Он её заметил и не захотел нажимать. Не понял цену, не поверил обещанию, не …
Пользователь не главный
Звучит так, будто меня сейчас надо выгнать из дизайна, но камон. У бизнеса есть деньги, ограничения, юристы, технологии и план продаж. У пользователя — желание получить всё быстро, бесплатно и чтобы не спрашивали номер телефона. Если просто встать на сторону пользователя, продукт можно закрывать.
Задача дизайнера не любить пользователя сильнее всех в комнате, а договориться между всеми сторо…
Складной айфон — это не новый брейкпоинт
Мы тут посмеялись, что под эту штуку теперь придётся адаптировать дизайны. А я потом полез смотреть, что Apple вообще сделала с интерфейсом. И там всё чуть хуже))
У внутреннего и внешнего экранов одинаковое соотношение сторон. Казалось бы, выдохнули — просто растянули макет и пошли дальше. Но в раскрытом состоянии можно запустить два приложения рядом, открыть две копии одног…
Когда уже иишка всех заменит?
Можно как угодно относиться к ИИ, но ясно одно — его стало слишком много. А начитавшись новостей о том, как какие-то компании оптимизируют (сокращают) целые отделы и отдают их работу ИИшке, реально может показаться, что конец света уже наступил
А по факту что
Все время существования мира была работа, которую делали люди. А потом случалась революция, индустриальная например, и эту же ра…
🔥12custom 54653094155927159189❤5💯1🕊1🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @designvorkel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @designvorkel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если вижу работу, могу оставить комменты по ней19%
Просто прохожу мимо53%
Открыт к любой ос по моим работам41%
Посмотреть ответы16%
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Продуктовые штуки, логику, все завязано на метриках15%
Концепчу, создаю что-то с нуля, рисую24%
Все))39%
Посмотреть ответы22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 20 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel @desprod · 25,643 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна @pdigest · 49,098 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Дизайнер, привет @jun_hi · 23,418 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
дизайнерс.сайты @cyrillicdesign · 34,472 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
perasperadastra ✱ сучков саша @perasperagram · 38,126 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Secret Design @secretd · 22,124 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Hard Client @hardclient · 22,901 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам @jun_hi_vacancies · 43,116 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Поясни за UX @poyasnizaux · 20,021 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг @mutimdigital · 30,003 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА @designer_ru · 81,506 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах @brainshare · 21,744 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
UX Notes @uxnotes · 23,535 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Now How Channel @nowhow · 24,335 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
Bang Bang Education @bbe_school · 25,253 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Студия Артемия Лебедева @artlebedev · 22,049 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
UX Horn 🌀 @uxhorn · 21,252 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
Дизайн-переводчик @design_translator · 20,567 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах @blackproduct · 21,498 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Адовый UX @uxfromhell · 50,321 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Job for Designers @fordesigner · 25,297 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Джун Дизайнер - вакансии @junior_designers · 20,676 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко @normalno_delaj · 21,465 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Дизайн-снайпер @designsniper · 28,012 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт” (@designvorkel), 10,057 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designvorkel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.