Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адовый UX

Channel

Адовый UX

@uxfromhell

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

50,278subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001174304504
TypeChannel
Username@uxfromhell
DescriptionПримеры плохих интерфейсов, юикса и истории про это всё Присылайте свои примеры автору канала в бота: @uxfromhellbot По рекламе: @kgreenmedia В реестре: vk.cc/cKf91b Автор: @kirillgreen Оставляя комментарии, вы соглашаетесь на оскорбления в свой адрес
Created15 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uxfromhell

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

50,24950,33250,290.55 August 2026 — 50,326 subscribers6 August 2026 — 50,326 subscribers6 August 2026 — 50,324 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,332 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,314 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,307 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,295 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,282 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,278 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,268 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50,272 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,266 subscribers17 August 2026 — 50,249 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,268 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,264 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,278 subscribers50,2785 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 17 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,237–50,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 12:4250,278+14
21 Aug 2026, 03:2450,264-4
20 Aug 2026, 01:4150,268+19
17 Aug 2026, 21:1550,249-17
16 Aug 2026, 22:1350,266-6
15 Aug 2026, 11:4550,272+4
14 Aug 2026, 01:5850,268-10
12 Aug 2026, 17:1850,278-4
11 Aug 2026, 14:0850,282-13
10 Aug 2026, 13:5250,295-12
9 Aug 2026, 15:3150,307-7
8 Aug 2026, 18:3650,314-18
7 Aug 2026, 22:0250,332+8
6 Aug 2026, 21:3650,324-2
6 Aug 2026, 01:4650,326no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:5950,326first reading

Engagement

138 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 50,278 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,990
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 138 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held138 (3 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total964,780
Reactions total42,091
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,350
Videos
632
Links
631

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36,934 reactions across 119 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁8,93424.2%
custom 52402809821452120878,57023.2%
custom 52402080450105911783,90010.6%
🤣1,9715.34%
1,8444.99%
😭1,7544.75%
🔥1,2383.35%
🤯8962.43%
💩8072.18%
🖕8062.18%
🤪6831.85%
🌚6351.72%
🤡6061.64%
🤮4711.28%
💯3971.07%
👍3560.964%
🤬3400.921%
🌭2930.793%
2710.734%
💔2410.653%
37 further kinds1,9215.20%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,091reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 138 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uxfromhell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.725%
1 of 138 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
6,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
7,010
over 137 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvFiakT19 August 20269 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈3,120 views103 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyabirman_sharesPhoto

Вы еще не прошли проверку ✓

custom 52402080450105911787210👍74custom 52402809821452120874👌3😁3

21 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈6,420 views406 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

С днюхой, ЛШТШФУМ Ащьф

🔥209🎉12725🫡22custom 52402809821452120878❤‍🔥6custom 52402080450105911784😁3

21 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈7,490 views390 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Всегда думал, что эта работа оплачивается гораздо лучше

custom 5240280982145212087277😁81🌚16custom 5240208045010591178842😢2

21 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈6,650 views181 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Пер — эт креп поп беспл

custom 5240280982145212087124😁37custom 5240208045010591178115🌚31

20 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC≈7,210 views350 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

(необязательно)* *обязательно

😁246custom 524020804501059117858custom 524028098214521208732🖕74👍21

20 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈7,800 views413 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо, чот не хочется вымирать

custom 5240280982145212087317🔥30🤯25👎11custom 52402080450105911788😁7🤣5🌚4

20 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈6,730 views222 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

...and AI frontend?

111😁72🌚15custom 52402080450105911789custom 524028098214521208754🤡4👾2

20 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈6,860 views353 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Парковка оказалась слишком глубокой

162custom 524028098214521208781🤣58🌚22😁15custom 524020804501059117892👎2

20 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈6,650 views310 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Нерегулярная рубрика #ШТО

custom 5240280982145212087259custom 524020804501059117822🤯19😁5🤝21👍1🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈6,820 views519 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

У Design Prosmotr вышла лекция Артемия Лебедева «Вопросы дизайнера» — 45 минут ответов без нравоучений О чём там: почему дизайн это не картинка, а решение задачи; что нейросети обесценивают механическую работу и поднимают цену нормальной идее; зачем изучать плохой дизайн; как продавать дороже и почему предсказуемость важнее вдохновения Четыре мысли, ради которых стоит посмотреть: — «В эпоху искусственного интеллек

💩297🤮108🤡75🖕186👍4🤣4🍌2

20 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈7,010 views293 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

…и даже знать, что такое круговая диаграмма, дизайнерам уже не обязательно (зато иконки поставил в сегменты диаграммы и сидит довольный)

😁180custom 524028098214521208763custom 524020804501059117823🙏76🥴6🤔3👎2

20 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈7,090 views293 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Не курить! Даже, если вы забрались под сиденье! Даже, если вы женщина!

😭151🤣84😁27custom 524020804501059117810custom 524028098214521208787💯4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @uxfromhell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTCAnonymous Poll3,180 voters approx.

Как думаете, вы проработаете в айти до пенсии? (Если ещё не работаете, сможете ли найти работу в айти и проработать в этой сфере до пенсии?)

  1. Скорее да21%
  2. Может да, может нет33%
  3. Скорее нет33%
  4. Я не из айти и переходить в эту сферу не планирую13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,193 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

welcome to the end of the world party
@wtteotwp · 5
4 posts
HZChannel
@hzkto_channel · 49
2 posts
/home/lomalkin/lol
@lomalkin_lol · 109
2 posts
нет, ну в принципе всё понятно
@sickinfographic · 29
2 posts
Анастасия Че | UX и продажи для бизнеса
@anastasiache_ux · 45
1 post
пробовали ли вы манго
@assaggiare_mango · 88
1 post
Оди
@awdee · 33,675
1 post
Либертарианцы Белогорья
@bro_lpr · 31
1 post
BTRK
@btrkfm · 1
1 post
Канал
@can_all · 53
1 post
Cereal translator
@cereal_translator · 3,109
1 post
CISлота
@CISlota_K2 · 4
1 post
Даня пишет, что…
@danyatutpishet · 239
1 post
Блог*
@dereference_pointer_there · 1,965
1 post
Диаграммные беруши
@diagrammushi · 140
1 post
Джун на фронте | IT Dev Log
@divatoz · 6,973
1 post
Abracadaver
@electroclown · 37
1 post
Эвона как
@evonakak · 7
1 post
Комментирующие Гиенуши
@fattorymemes · 172
1 post
[GingerFox⁸⁷ Blog]
@GingerFox87_blog · 260
1 post
Хороший интерфейс
@goodux · 6,774
1 post
Холинимовый шитпост
@holinimshitpost · 161
1 post
Илья Бирман чё-то нашёл
@ilyabirman_shares · 1,631
1 post
ПРОКЛЯТЫЕ ИНТЕРФЕЙСЫ
@INTERFUUU · 181
1 post
Считай капусту
@kapusta_tracker · 85
1 post
KrololoPower
@Krololochannel · 5,131
1 post
Лингводорчик
@lingvodor · 4,087
1 post
More PROdesign
@moreprodesign · 15
1 post
N
@N_umero · 18
1 post
Продукты и аналитика 🕊
@products_and_analytics · 64
1 post
provpan_memes
@provpan_memes · 31
1 post
punbox
@punbox · 161
1 post
Путь поставщика
@puti_post · 1,956
1 post
QA Memes
@qa_memes · 4,056
1 post
Квантовый молоток 🔨
@quantumhammer · 44
1 post
፱፩፱፪፱፱፪፱፩፱፩፱፪፰፫፰፪
@rilliat_chan · 146
1 post
Сахарный Батюшка
@rokokev · 15
1 post
UX, Security и другие приколы
@s3curity_and_UX · 169
1 post
смешарите?
@sashausespremium · 63
1 post
НАДИЗАЙНИЛ
@semin_indesign · 285
1 post
Серж-консьерж 🌞🌴🌈🐢
@serj_konsierj · 149
1 post
макробложик сигмовского
@sigmovskiystuff · 41
1 post
Вы оригинальны
@smasteril1 · 6
1 post
Sanëchek ㋡
@sogosleeppp · 473
1 post
tapafon_red
@tapafon_red · 3
1 post
Технически работает
@technicalyworks · 64
1 post
Душный PMM
@that_guy_pmm · 165
1 post
о
@TheLetterO · 49
1 post
true_security
@true_sec · 2,429
1 post
Попробуйте выключить и включить
@turnoffturnon · 622
1 post
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,841
1 post
по UXUI
@uxui_luda · 17
1 post
Страдания юного видеоинженера
@video_engineer_pains · 1,709
1 post
Злая редакторка
@zlaya_redaktorka · 139
1 post
⁣Злой Админ
@zloyadm_in · 231
1 post
Зуев | Zujev
@zujev · 42
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Зашкваркетинг
@dankmarketing · 59,612
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 106,665
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Игромир
@Igromir_cloud · 59,562
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 78,401
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Telegram Info
@tginfo · 82,779
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 79,911
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
I’m CEO, beach
@imceobeach · 65,909
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
Дизайн-Телега 🔥
@design_telega · 80,011
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
ohuenko
@ohuenko · 343,778
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Главред Максим Ильяхов
@glvrdru · 69,526
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 87,404
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 135,227
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Джуниор Вакансии Стажировки IT
@juniors_rabota_jobs · 66,556
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
👨🏻‍💻/ Марат Юсупов
@maratyus · 103,302
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
IT Юмор
@ithumor · 60,678
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Учебник дизайнера
@dsgn_tutorial · 83,624
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
СЕТИ — IT & Digital вакансии
@it_vakansii_jobs · 93,552
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Што за шрифт?
@wtfont · 130,053
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 63,357
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Fonts | Шрифты для дизайнеров
@fontsch · 68,717
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Партизанский Маркетинг
@GuerrillaMarketing · 102,574
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 71,491
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Young & Junior - вакансии IT
@young_june · 71,785
Telegram ranks this channel #99 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Job for Junior
@jobforjunior · 83,518
Telegram ranks this channel #99 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адовый UX” (@uxfromhell), 50,278 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uxfromhell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.