Только интересные новости из мира IT и технологий, со ссылками на англоязычные источники.
Единственный автор @bobuk. Рекламы в канале нет (и не просите).
Правила общения в коментариях bit.ly/reasonable-default
Created
23 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 89 days, net -198. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,595–72,332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 20:26
71,993
-93
1 Nov 2026, 17:15
72,086
+34
31 Oct 2026, 17:10
72,052
+38
30 Oct 2026, 16:08
72,014
+334
29 Oct 2026, 15:19
71,680
-70
28 Oct 2026, 15:56
71,750
-4
27 Oct 2026, 16:01
71,754
-11
26 Oct 2026, 16:49
71,765
-81
25 Oct 2026, 13:39
71,846
-17
24 Oct 2026, 13:56
71,863
-11
23 Oct 2026, 17:01
71,874
-12
21 Oct 2026, 18:41
71,886
+2
20 Oct 2026, 17:27
71,884
-2
19 Oct 2026, 16:29
71,886
-8
18 Oct 2026, 16:46
71,894
+20
17 Oct 2026, 15:16
71,874
+12
16 Oct 2026, 15:06
71,862
+5
15 Oct 2026, 18:27
71,857
+17
14 Oct 2026, 19:47
71,840
+8
13 Oct 2026, 09:59
71,832
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
58.9%
avg views ÷ 71,993 subscribers
Avg views / post
42,400
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
35 (17 November 2025 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
636,200
Reactions total
6,705
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈180
Videos
≈45
Links
≈5,980
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,144 reactions across 35 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
3,976
24.6%
👍
3,777
23.4%
🔥
2,469
15.3%
😢
1,933
12.0%
❤
1,500
9.29%
👎
1,350
8.36%
⚡
402
2.49%
🎉
375
2.32%
👌
196
1.21%
🤩
166
1.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
363
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 35 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
129
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @addmeto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 November 2025 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Apple отчитались за Q4, и это первый звонок с инвесторами для Джона Тернуса (aka 1982.Terminus, потому что в имени андроидов должны быть цифры) в роли CEO. Выручка $114,48 млрд при ожиданиях $113,35 млрд. iPhone принес рекордные для сентябрьского квартала $57,58 млрд, хотя iPhone 18 Pro Max продавался всего несколько недель. Сервисы, т.е. App Store, Apple TV, Apple Music, iCloud и т.п., выросли почти на 10% до $31,57…
«Яндекс» заменил военный объект на спутниковой карте изображением леса, пишет «Новая газета Европа» со ссылкой на активиста Даниила Чебыкина. На месте узла связи «Трибуна» под Омском в спутниковом слое Яндекс Карт видна роща, тогда как на снимках других сервисов видны здания и дороги. Это уже не первый такой случай. В августе Yle обнаружила похожую подмену под Кронштадтом, где военный объект скрывали повторяющиеся фр…
Путин обязал владельцев негосударственных дата-центров держать в резерве 10% мощностей для российской IT-инфраструктуры и предоставлять их в течение 24 часов после решения комиссии. Reuters пишет об этом на фоне атак украинских дронов на российские объекты. Даже интересно, а что случилось?
Это не конфискация (пока). По пересказу Настоящего Времени, услуги платные с ограничением тарифа, а пока мощности никто не востр…
День Маска на канале. Две новости про деньги, и рядом они смотрятся особенно хорошо. NYT: на промежуточные выборы 2026 года Маск отдал политическим группам рекордные $474 млн. Это самая большая сумма в истории для человека, который сам на выборах не баллотируется. 🔗 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/02/us/politics/elon-musk-midterm-spending.html
Форбс: тем временем подписчики Grok жалуются, что лимиты использования за…
WP: SpaceX ведет переговоры с EchoStar о покупке Boost Mobile или получении доступа к ее сети (это такой местечковый мобильный оператор, по сути MVNO). Ранее Verizon, T-Mobile и AT&T отказались предоставить SpaceX доступ к своим сетям.
Понятно зачем, это дало бы Маску возможность воплотить свою мечту и запустить собственный мобильный сервис. В последние месяцы он лично обращался к руководителям крупнейших телеком-ко…
Сегодняшний ИИ-дайджест: деньги стали дороже, инфраструктура — политичнее, а локальный ИИ снова упёрся в железо
Утро началось с неприятного для ИИ-рынка сигнала: OpenAI, по данным FT и WSJ, уже ищет не $30 млрд при оценке $1,4 трлн, а около $20 млрд при $1,25 трлн. Собрано пока примерно $11 млрд, часть инвесторов сократила обязательства на фоне распродажи в ИИ-активах. Это не «пузырь лопнул», но хороший маркер: даже…
Деньги дорожают, рейтинги ухудшаются, вода и электричество становятся политикой, supply chain превращается в поле атаки, а разговор о «локальном ИИ» упирается в вопрос, кому выгодно владеть памятью. Скучно? Да. Но именно так технологии взрослеют: сначала демо, потом дата-центр, потом облигации, вода, регуляторы и кто-то с плакатом у забора. 🔗 https://www.ft.com/content/7a3ad950-1b3b-4d9e-8c15-65a61ae6180f
Anthropic переименовывает тарифы: Max 5x теперь просто Max ($100 в месяц), а Max 20x называется Ultra ($200). Цены те же, подписчикам ничего делать не надо. Главное другое: для верифицированных Ultra-аккаунтов убирают 5-часовой лимит, с сегодняшнего дня у большинства существующих подписчиков. Новым аккаунтам временный лимит оставят до верификации, это защита от фрода и абьюза. Когда лимит снимут, придёт письмо.
Для …
ИИ обеспечивают себе независимость от людей.
Google Suncatcher, прототип спутника-датацентра, вышел на связь с Землёй. Его запустили 1 октября на Falcon 9 вместе с сотней других аппаратов. Внутри четыре TPU и до 1 кВт электричества. После трёх недель проверок инженеры отправили первый промпт, и Gemma 4 на орбите написала хайку про то, как ей там, в космосе. Получилось примерно как у всех моделей, со звёздочкой-эмодз…
Высокий суд Лондона отклонил иск Meta, TikTok и X против Ofcom (британский регулятор связи и медиа). Компании оспаривали запросы информации, которые Ofcom рассылает в рамках Online Safety Act, и доказывали, что они непропорциональны. Суд с этим не согласился.
Удивительное дело: три компании, которые обычно ни в чём друг с другом не согласны, вместе пошли в суд и все равно проиграли. Похоже, британский регулятор тепе…
Binance, по данным Reuters, зарезервировала более $6,34 млрд собственных средств, чтобы разобраться с последствиями взлома на $6,3 млрд. Из них $5 млрд — токены тех самых пострадавших активов, которые у биржи уже были.
Первое впечатление: биржа способна закрыть такую дыру из своего кармана, и это говорит о её размерах лучше любого отчёта. Но если присмотреться, большая часть «резерва» — это токены, по которым и приш…
Кажется сейчас будет громко по всему миру. Только что куда-то поехали 2.5 миллиарда портфолио eth горячего кошелька Binance. При этом контракт оплачен через миксер, очень похоже на взлом.
UPD: Уже 3.5 миллиарда и продолжает увеличиваться. И следом туда же ByBit судя по всему
😢392🔥174😁136⚡39🎉16👍15🤩13❤12
Signed Grigory Bakunov
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @addmeto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@addmeto edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 October 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tech Crunch @techcrunchru · 16,304 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
42 секунды @ftsec · 19,406 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
Digital Доктор @tlgdoc · 29,183 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
запуск завтра @ctodaily · 33,731 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
TechSparks @techsparks · 46,780 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
ЗаТелеком 🌐 @zatelecom · 64,571 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
Neural Shit @NeuralShit · 54,629 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
e/acc @cryptoEssay · 63,703 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
эйай ньюз @ai_newz · 98,112 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖 @denissexy · 139,851 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Техасский Вестник @starbasepost · 19,246 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
ITDog @itdoginfo · 19,271 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 October 2026
Двоичный кот @binarcat · 30,766 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Малоизвестное интересное @theworldisnoteasy · 74,222 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Сиолошная @seeallochnaya · 80,942 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Хабр @habr_com · 133,981 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
IT News | ИТ Новости | Техно @techno_news_tg · 20,042 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного @aioftheday · 44,530 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Fun Science @funscience · 34,241 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
The Bell @thebell_io · 105,072 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный. @startupoftheday · 62,421 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
N + 1 @nplusone · 65,255 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
PRO Hi-Tech @prohitec · 69,548 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Fixed.One: новости мира Apple и не только… @FixedOneNews · 21,039 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 400 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named 2 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“addmeto” (@addmeto), 71,993 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/addmeto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.