Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 34 days, net +417. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,738–15,281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 06:19
15,218
+30
6 Sept 2026, 01:16
15,188
+3
3 Sept 2026, 18:19
15,185
+4
2 Sept 2026, 10:42
15,181
+6
1 Sept 2026, 12:24
15,175
+5
31 Aug 2026, 09:58
15,170
+8
30 Aug 2026, 08:43
15,162
+6
29 Aug 2026, 06:25
15,156
+3
28 Aug 2026, 06:48
15,153
-2
27 Aug 2026, 08:34
15,155
+28
26 Aug 2026, 07:33
15,127
+15
25 Aug 2026, 04:26
15,112
+7
23 Aug 2026, 23:37
15,105
+19
22 Aug 2026, 08:17
15,086
+18
21 Aug 2026, 00:41
15,068
+6
20 Aug 2026, 01:25
15,062
+31
18 Aug 2026, 21:54
15,031
+40
17 Aug 2026, 23:51
14,991
+41
16 Aug 2026, 22:02
14,950
+4
15 Aug 2026, 17:42
14,946
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 15,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,190
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.463%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
50 (22 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
104,630
Reactions total
484
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 01s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,006 reactions across 45 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
282
28.0%
❤
276
27.4%
🔥
221
22.0%
👍
109
10.8%
🙈
48
4.77%
💯
14
1.39%
😨
11
1.09%
🤓
11
1.09%
🤷♀
10
0.994%
🤯
8
0.795%
🤔
5
0.497%
🦄
5
0.497%
👏
2
0.199%
🫡
2
0.199%
👾
1
0.099%
🙏
1
0.099%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,099 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 50 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ppprompt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Оч радостно, когда выпускники AI Native возвращаются и показывают, что стало с их проектами уже после интенсива. Зацените какой классный кейс у Татьяны, выпускницы второго потока.
Она пришла с довольно понятным запросом: перестать использовать ChatGPT и Claude как набор отдельных чатов и собрать систему, которая заберёт на себя максимум рутины вокруг поиска работы.
А в итоге собрала собственную Personal OS и Career…
Только что вышедший Claude Fable 5.1 - в сравнении с 5.0:
• Долгие многошаговые задачи (agentic tasks) стали получаться лучше: 42% → 55.8% (Terminal-Bench). Рисеч-задачи с проверкой научных гипотез и написанием кода для экспериментов: 24.7% → 52.6% (Terminal-Bench-Science) - тут вообще рост 2x.
• Чтение уже обработанного текста диалога (cache reading) подешевело в 4 раза: $1 → $0.25/1M токенов. На агентных задачах,…
Вышел OpenClaw 2.0
Главное изменение: установка стала проще, теперь при первом запуске OpenClaw может подхватывать уже доступные на компьютере ChatGPT или Claude подписки, API-ключи и локальные модели, чтобы быстрее довести пользователя до первого разговора без долгой настройки.
Ещё важные апдейты: браузерная версия стала основным интерфейсом, появились shared cloud sessions для совместной работы с сохранением конт…
Поймал себя на мысли, что все чаще для своих дел я сперва создаю скиллы для AI-агентов (+шарю их с командой). А если задача чуть более объемная и системная - то теперь еще и микро-продукты. Вот вам свежая история.
Создал себе Personal CRM для управления отношениями, потому что тут было оч много болей. У меня сотни или даже тысячи разных интересных людей в круге общения, и много с кем я забываю поддерживать связь, ра…
Почему контекст важнее промптов?
Одна из важных вещей, с которой мы начинаем интенсив AI Native, - это сбор контекста для своей базы знаний. Причина простая: промпт - это одно окно, а контекст - то, что AI может переиспользовать снова и снова. Без него он каждый раз общается с вами как в первый раз, а с базой знаний понимает вашу историю, проекты, цели и то, как вы вообще думаете.
База знаний - это структурированны…
Иногда я записываю подкасты с интересными людьми и не только про AI. Поэтому анонс ниже — про мой подкаст. И оне, не 1й, а аж 41-й. Enjoy!
Психотерапия сейчас, в 2026 - это как? Кто и почему приходит? Важен ли подход (типа КПТ или IFS)? Можно ли просто с ИИ общаться вместо психотерапевта? А если искать человека, то как найти мэтч?
Я за вас позадавал вопросы директору клиентской поддержки в Ясно. Получился подкаст …
Google выпустили Gemini 3.5 Transcribe, новую модель для перевода речи в текст. Она не просто дословно расшифровывает аудио, а лучше понимает живую речь: распознаёт исправления на ходу, убирает слова-паразиты, форматирует текст и лучше работает с шумом, акцентами и диалектами.
Модель поддерживает 85+ языков, включая русский, и уже доступна разработчикам в Gemini API и AI Studio.
https://blog.google/innovation-and-a…
Нашел на Reddit переводчик "English ↔ Claudish" — превращает нормальный человеческий текст в фирменный корпоративно-заумный стиль Клода (и обратно). Гениально бесполезная и забавная штука))
Ссылка: https://programasweights.com/claudish
Код: https://github.com/programasweights/claudish
@ppprompt
В Пекине счас проходят соревнования роботов и гуманоид Honor уже побил рекорд кожаных в стометровке - 9.3 секунды, что быстрее результата Усэйна Болта в 9,58.
@ppprompt
В ChatGPT добавили плагин для Apple Messages на Mac
Теперь ChatGPT может искать по вашим сообщениям, находить нужное в старых переписках, кратко пересказывать, что вы пропустили, а также готовить и отправлять ответы — всё это без переключения в Messages.
Функция уже доступна в ChatGPT Work и в Codex для десктопа.
@ppprompt
❤5🙈3🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @ppprompt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Метаверсище и ИИще @cgevent · 51,912 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Малоизвестное интересное @theworldisnoteasy · 73,980 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Ai molodca @strangedalle · 46,923 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Силиконовый Мешок @prompt_design · 85,163 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного @aioftheday · 42,967 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Neural Shit @NeuralShit · 53,113 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Нейроскептик @neuroskep · 29,500 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖 @denissexy · 136,970 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
эйай ньюз @ai_newz · 96,728 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Сиолошная @seeallochnaya · 78,788 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг @AIGamzatov · 29,613 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
LLM под капотом @llm_under_hood · 29,013 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
НЕЙРОГРАМОТНОСТЬ @edu4telegram · 41,385 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
TechSparks @techsparks · 46,487 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Serge_AI 1.0 @serge_ai · 57,720 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Технологии | Нейросети | Боты @aiaiai · 176,636 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Нейросетевые покои: нейросети, ChatGPT, Midjourney @neural_houses · 44,782 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
e/acc @cryptoEssay · 62,370 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
NeuroADEPT @neuroadepts · 41,534 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Смотри, Морозов и ИИ @mmmorozov · 61,292 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Двоичный кот @binarcat · 30,895 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Промт дня (Приручаем ChatGPT, Midjourney и другие нейросети) @ai2smm · 58,763 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
🟡NeuroGraph @neyr0graph · 34,444 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
PROAI @pro_ai_news · 91,491 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ppprompt | Sexy AI Prompts & Experiments | by @ponchiknews” (@ppprompt), 15,218 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppprompt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.