Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бурый

Channel

Бурый

@sburyi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,159subscribers

+587 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941027069
TypeChannel
Username@sburyi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sburyi

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,57219,88219,2276 August 2026 — 18,572 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,572 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,573 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,022 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,155 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,168 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,303 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,347 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,604 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,775 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,882 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,839 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,786 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,775 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,763 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,733 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,683 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,656 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,616 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,598 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,578 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,564 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,530 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,517 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,483 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,473 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,464 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,434 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,413 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,361 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,291 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,255 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,227 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,190 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19,159 subscribers19,1596 August 202619 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 45 days, net +587. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,376–20,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:3919,159-31
17 Sept 2026, 03:1619,190-37
15 Sept 2026, 06:1519,227-28
13 Sept 2026, 12:5719,255-36
11 Sept 2026, 18:1619,291-70
9 Sept 2026, 06:0119,361-52
5 Sept 2026, 19:0019,413-21
3 Sept 2026, 17:1619,434-30
2 Sept 2026, 06:1319,464-9
1 Sept 2026, 07:4319,473-10
31 Aug 2026, 10:3619,483-34
30 Aug 2026, 08:4519,517-13
29 Aug 2026, 06:1319,530-34
28 Aug 2026, 06:1319,564-14
27 Aug 2026, 05:2319,578-20
26 Aug 2026, 04:4319,598-18
25 Aug 2026, 05:1319,616-40
24 Aug 2026, 02:2719,656-27
22 Aug 2026, 10:2719,683-50
21 Aug 2026, 01:0319,733first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 19,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,600
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.617%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held42 (19 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total36,790
Reactions total227
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

781 reactions across 40 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾781100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 798 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 42 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sburyi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 05:44 UTC≈3,820 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Проснулся от «Прекрасного далёка» за окном. Жена сказала, что мне пора в школу, ведь 1 сентября. У меня аж холодок по коже пробежал от всей этой атмосферы праздника 🥶 Слышал, что люди говорят, вот бы снова в школу. Вроде как работать гораздо труднее, чем учиться. У меня вообще не так. Учёба в школе была невероятно трудной и стрессовой, причём без всякого буллинга и прочего, просто реально бесконечная учёба с домашк

👾30

30 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC≈4,100 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Абсолютное удовольствие я получаю от первого предложения, которое даёт нам всё для будущей истории. Вот буквально всё — и понимание, о чём это и в каком виде будет подано, и конфликт, и сюжет. В Голливуде это бы назвали идеальным логлайном. Мой любимый (думаю, догадаетесь, что это): Проснувшись однажды утром после беспокойного сна, Грегор Замза обнаружил, что он у себя в постели превратился в страшное насекомое. И

👾25

28 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈4,430 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Сегодня попал в некий диссонанс 👾 С одной стороны, в меня кидали ссылки и отсутствующие подтверждения на тему да кому нужен твой вайбкодинг, эти твои агенты, тьфу, все это уже давно знают и используют вроде как надо дальше идти и строить более сложные вещи, а это уже прошлое, это все умеют. Но я что-то не поверил. По-моему, это какой-то очень узкий взгляд. Как если бы я со своим зрением в районе минус 10 с погреш

👾13

27 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈4,500 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сейчас расскажу историю, как я вхлам разругался со своим другом, писателем Аль Джу, когда мы пытались делать совместный проект лет 15 назад. И как я сегодня с ИИ сделал эту штуку за несколько минут. Итак, шёл какой-то весьма древний год, наверное, 2011-й, 2013-й или вроде того (напомню, в 2012-м был конец света, так что точно не тогда). Как обычно, мне пришла в голову очередная идея, которую я тут же бросился вопл

👾20

27 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈5,660 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Принёс вам наш собственный курс, по итогам которого у вас будет личная агентная ИИ система с нуля 👾 Ну, или если хотите, это самый базовый и разжёванный до молекул курс по вайбкодингу. Подойдёт для всех, прежде всего ориентация на нулевой, начальный и средний уровни ИИ-знаний. Причём самое интересное, что курс очень гибкий и не имеет значения, с чем вы будете работать: хоть Claude Code, хоть Codex (я на нём проходил

👾17

26 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈4,540 views76 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Тот, кого нельзя называть нейронкам Похоже, среди вас таких нет. Неделю назад я запустил аукцион невиданной щедрости и вскоре покажу вам результаты (на следующей неделе уже точно). Разошлю каждому, отдам, что называется, в руки, а сюда дам какой-то общий отчёт о проделанной работе. Вы прислали мне на аудит десятки ваших брендов, и это оч круто. Я сжираю огромное количество токенов, но мне всё равно. Как сказала бы

👾76

24 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈4,910 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Смерть референса 👾 Меня всегда раздражал референс. Само это понятие — референс, пример, образец, бенчмарк. Помнится, на одном стандартном рабочем месте меня всё время спрашивали про референс. — Да нет никакого референса, я сам всё придумаю и сделаю, дайте спокойно поработать, — раздражался я. Нет, нужен референс, отвечали они. Без референса никуда. Референс царь и бок. Да, действительно, трудно что-то сделать без

👾28

24 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC≈4,830 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сейчас будет небольшая история борьбы с внутренним дедом 👴 Итак, лет 15 я работал в основном за ноутбуком, но в прошлом году объёмы трудов пошли такие, что глаза перестали вывозить. На новогодних праздниках я купил себе комфортный большой монитор, подключил к нему ноут и радовался жизни. Деления на монитора на 2-3 экрана мне вполне хватало + рядом всегда смартфон. И тут в беседе с небезызвестным в наших кругах Игор

👾18

23 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈4,290 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ответы ИИ — новая Википедия 👾 Во вторую я пока не попал, но знаю примеры, как туда попадали, так скажем, с курьёзом (тааак я хотел написать короткий пост-мысль, но тут же вспомнил историю и понеслась...) К нам в редакцию часто заходили разнообразные известные личности: спортсмены, актёры, бандиты. И несколько раз захаживал один очень востребованный актёр, чтобы править интервью. Конечно, имя его я называть не буду

👾17

21 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈4,390 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

А как всё-таки правильно? Гемини Джемини Джеминай И куда ставится ударение Если честно, у меня ощущение, что я заколхозил и всё это время говорил неправильно 👾

👾13

19 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈5,580 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Сейчас будет аукцион невиданной щедрости 👾 Неделю назад я выступал на ИИ форуме, рассказывал про то, как попасть в ответы нейросетей и улучшить ИИ видимость (свою, бренда, компании, зловещей корпорации Антропик и так далее). Вам я уже об этом рассказывал — как интуитивными и бесплатными способами повысил свой балл ИИ видимости за месяц на 10+ баллов (а всего их 100) и решил, что дальше буду двигаться уже продуманно

👾19

16 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC≈5,480 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Мало кто обратил внимание на историю, близкую к апокалипсису, случившуюся на этой неделе. Подробности мне прислал публицист Константин Степанов, с которым мы в июне подробно обсудили ИИ повестку в самом сердце Петербурга. Суть в чём. Гении из британского AI Security Institute (AISI) решили провести эксперимент. В цифровой песочнице, из которой как бы не выбраться, они натравили ИИ хакеров (свежие модели Sol и Mytho

👾34

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @sburyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@sburyi edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTCAnonymous Poll1,040 voters approx.

Каким вайб-кодинг-агентом вы пользуетесь?

  1. Claude Code40%
  2. Codex38%
  3. Cursor11%
  4. Gemini CLI7%
  5. Китайские агенты (Qwen, Kimi)11%
  6. Другой12%
  7. Пока никаким12%
  8. Я всё ещё маленький апельсин14%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tips AI | IT & AI
@tips_ai · 25,376
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Силиконовый Мешок
@prompt_design · 85,657
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
НейроProfit | Соня Pro Ai
@NeuralProfit · 23,400
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Технологии | Нейросети | Боты
@aiaiai · 176,423
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
CyberYozh AI Security
@CyberYozh_AI_security · 26,576
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Neurogen
@neurogen_news · 22,930
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 62,598
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 52,361
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Ai molodca
@strangedalle · 46,847
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Нейроскептик
@neuroskep · 29,484
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
NeuroADEPT
@neuroadepts · 41,375
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
ИИ Представляет
@iirepresent · 120,362
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Смотри, Морозов и ИИ
@mmmorozov · 61,416
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Serge_AI 1.0
@serge_ai · 57,484
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
🟡NeuroGraph
@neyr0graph · 34,435
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Lama AI
@lama_channel_gpt · 24,736
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
PROAI
@pro_ai_news · 90,512
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
SYNTX FAMILY
@syntxfamily · 323,728
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
НЕЙРОГРАМОТНОСТЬ
@edu4telegram · 40,932
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Sber AI
@SberAIScience · 27,279
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Нейросетевые покои: нейросети, ChatGPT, Midjourney
@neural_houses · 44,640
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бурый” (@sburyi), 19,159 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sburyi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.