Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 60 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,222–19,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 19:15
19,482
+226
26 Sept 2026, 23:17
19,256
-9
17 Sept 2026, 14:16
19,265
-7
15 Sept 2026, 14:40
19,272
-2
14 Sept 2026, 00:20
19,274
-6
12 Sept 2026, 09:17
19,280
-25
10 Sept 2026, 02:19
19,305
-17
6 Sept 2026, 22:39
19,322
+1
4 Sept 2026, 05:38
19,321
-8
2 Sept 2026, 16:28
19,329
+4
1 Sept 2026, 16:59
19,325
+1
31 Aug 2026, 18:37
19,324
-3
30 Aug 2026, 15:24
19,327
-7
29 Aug 2026, 17:55
19,334
-2
28 Aug 2026, 19:24
19,336
-5
27 Aug 2026, 22:16
19,341
-3
26 Aug 2026, 19:34
19,344
-13
23 Aug 2026, 03:37
19,357
-5
21 Aug 2026, 18:36
19,362
-2
20 Aug 2026, 18:02
19,364
first reading
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 51 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17m 10s
Average length
2m 52s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,638 reactions across 47 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
650
24.6%
🔥
563
21.3%
😁
560
21.2%
👍
363
13.8%
💯
338
12.8%
❤🔥
57
2.16%
🦄
24
0.91%
😱
22
0.834%
custom 5784967785436154901
21
0.796%
😢
13
0.493%
👏
12
0.455%
🏆
10
0.379%
⚡
2
0.076%
🍾
2
0.076%
🥰
1
0.038%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,381 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 51 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ventureStuff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.96%
1 of 51 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,330
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,840
over 50 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqMnqfGbHwPj9TkuVcaZSfPkCdKPj4TwKrkmoK
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Про разных инвесторов
Пока я снимал новое видео (тоже залетело), играя роли разных инвесторов (смотри видосик) поймал себя на мысли, что они все настолько разные бывают, ебанутость от -100 до 100, что решил еще разные архетипы записать и снять.
А тут новый ролик уже 10К просмотров по стате, а первый уже 75К :)
56,000 просмотров за сутки
Норм формат
Сажусь писать новые кринж сценарии дичи.
Можете свои жизненные ситуации накидать в коментах, если есть чем поделиться :)
У меня на очереди
- зарисовки коллов с паханом
- звонки с enterprise клиентом
- инвестиционные комитеты VC фондов
Новый формат, который залетает или почему лучшее - враг хорошего
Пару месяцев назад я увидел формат в Instagram, который залетает и от которого я угораю - это сатиристические видеозвонки, где один и тот же актёр в разных ролях за каждого участника Zoom-колла, где участники несут всякую хуйню.
Мой друг Саша Ильин недавно начал делать этот формат и поделился со мной результатами, от чего я вдохновился и записал сегод…
Чужое всегда лучше
С парнями плавали в море, и как-то один произнес эту фразу, когда мы обсуждали, что оказывается часто бывает, что мы смотрим на чужое (приложение/проекты/бизнес), а порой сами дорисовываем в голове, как там круто.
Вот допустим есть один известный mobile app project с Кипра, и многим из нас казалось, что там круто, ибо их рекламу я вижу постоянно, даже пару раз скриншотил тесты воронки смотрел.
А…
У сына появилась цель
Чат, срочное включение
Ко мне только что подошел старший сын (12 лет) и сообщил что будет копить на свой первый комп ко дню рождения.
Сказал что с ЧатГПТ произвел ресерч и собрал себе конфигурацию.
Я конечно ему обьяснил, что NVMe SSD подорожали раза в 2 из-за нас с вами, но в душе я сейчас как ДиКаприо из мема.
Гордый и хочу разрыдаться
Спросил как он собирается накопить.
Будет копить ка…
A/B тест 80 уровня
Я только что посмотрел видео Mr. Beast, как он с кентами от полиции уходит и полиция получала по $100K в свой бюджет приз от него за каждого пойманного персонажа (их 5). Конечно же всех пятерых поймали.
Но мне друг только что на колле поведал, что он в зависимости от региона кастомные обложки для YouTube видео сделал, чтобы любой зритель узнал полицейскую машину именно из его региона!
Вот это да…
Нужны инвесторы и корпоративные пилоты в 2026? Всё в одном месте — на SberUnity! ⚡️
SberUnity — единственная площадка, где присутствуют все ключевые игроки рынка: 250+ корпораций, 1600+ инвесторов и 7500+ стартапов. Никакого парсинга — каждый стартап проверяется экспертами Сбера.
Прямо внутри SberUnity: запросы на скаутинг, венчурный маркетплейс, инструмент «Проверка ФНС». И это всё бесплатно — понадобится только н…
Как смотреть свой расход в Клоде
Мануал:
1/ Идешь на caprock.dev
2/ ставишь его командой:
brew install dspv/tap/caprock
3/ включаешь командой:
caprock up
4/ открывается http://127.0.0.1:4173/
5/ листаешь всю стату и изучаешь где ты зря юзаешь дорогие модели
Профит
Не благодарите
Диман, отвечай людям в коментах :)
Токен максинг и два клода
Друзья, надо поговорить об этом. Иногда мне кажется нам антропик раздает разные лимиты на одной и той же подписке клода за 200, но у меня лимит не кончается, а у многих кончается.
Почитав чатик, я пока склоняюсь к одной концепции: слишком зря вы часть лимитов расходуете.
Если вы любите Fable, используйте его ТОЛЬКО для анализа и планирования. Сам код писать Opus 4.8-5 отлично умеет, повер…
❤20👍4🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @ventureStuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кирилл Фомичев @fomichevkirill · 28,643 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Русский венчур @rusven · 24,857 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
The Edinorog 🦄 @Theedinorogblog · 43,580 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Телеграмма от Максима Юрина @yumaks · 42,858 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов @bossofyourboss · 27,600 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
СберСтартап @sberstartup · 41,187 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 29 August 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin @mtokovinin · 108,540 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Forbes. Идеи для бизнеса @forbes_business · 26,720 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 September 2026
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика @temno · 79,546 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
Индекс дятла @dindex · 22,080 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Kumar & Solo @solokumi · 37,775 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Tech Crunch @techcrunchru · 18,776 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Кутергин в огне 🔥 @kutergin_on_fire · 62,168 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Итак, это Панов @itakblet · 25,367 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
e/acc @cryptoEssay · 62,533 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Продакты не нужны @betternotworse · 28,430 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Гуринович делится! @gurinovich_shares · 29,381 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Герман Гаврилов @german_gavrilov · 18,720 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 October 2026
Rinat Aliev | Channel @telega_Rinata · 19,135 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
Максим Спиридонов @mspiridonov · 67,267 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного @aioftheday · 44,059 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
kyrillic @kyrillic · 60,918 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Dumik @dumik · 22,166 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Ваня Замесин @zamesin · 50,145 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Венчур по Понятиям” (@ventureStuff), 19,482 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ventureStuff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.