Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ChillHouse

Channel

ChillHouse

@chillhousetech

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,748subscribers

+633 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001447204980
TypeChannel
Username@chillhousetech
DescriptionBy Alexey Moiseenkov about startups, AI, ML and consumer product building. Opinions are my own. Only about tech.
Created12 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/chillhousetech

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1146,7486,4316 August 2026 — 6,115 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,115 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,114 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,118 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,119 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,248 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,272 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,286 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,290 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,300 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,301 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,382 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,531 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,584 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,609 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,636 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,659 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,677 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,686 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,695 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,724 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,727 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,732 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,742 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,748 subscribers6 August 20263 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net +633. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,019–6,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 13:066,748+6
31 Oct 2026, 20:376,742+10
29 Oct 2026, 00:456,732+5
26 Oct 2026, 09:346,727+3
23 Oct 2026, 13:286,724+29
17 Oct 2026, 07:496,695+9
14 Oct 2026, 15:376,686+9
10 Oct 2026, 22:176,677+18
4 Oct 2026, 20:396,659+23
25 Sept 2026, 06:196,636+27
17 Sept 2026, 03:206,609+25
13 Sept 2026, 07:396,584+53
9 Sept 2026, 04:416,531+149
3 Sept 2026, 22:016,382+81
31 Aug 2026, 03:546,301+1
27 Aug 2026, 22:346,300+10
25 Aug 2026, 03:086,290+4
21 Aug 2026, 15:066,286+14
18 Aug 2026, 14:236,272+24
15 Aug 2026, 09:556,248first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.2%
avg views ÷ 6,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,600
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held41 (30 May 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total36,810
Reactions total399
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 00:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
481
Videos
96
Links
568

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 37s
Average length
2m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,655 reactions across 41 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍87633.0%
😁50318.9%
❤46017.3%
🔥29211.0%
💯1907.16%
🤣923.47%
🤡913.43%
🤔762.86%
💩110.414%
👎100.377%
🦄90.339%
👏80.301%
🙏70.264%
😐60.226%
❤‍🔥50.188%
custom 632576224025536253640.151%
👀40.151%
☃30.113%
🤝30.113%
⚡20.075%
2 further kinds30.113%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,088
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 41 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
1,010
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chillhousetech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,720 views49 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Короче говоря s1 от Anthropic и их скорое IPO отражает все опасения индустрии. И они, конечно же, не про «аи бабл херня» или «ахахха компания нас дурит там одни убытки». Прочитал тонну мнений, вставлю свои пять копеек: 1/ заявка очень даже серьезная, все цифры сильные в хорошем смысле. Они действительно прибыльны, они действительно очень хорошо удерживают клиентов (900% ретеншен выручки это нонсенс, у типичного saa…

👍31🤔12❤2😁2🔥1🤝1

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

1 Nov 2026, 20:23 UTC≈3,420 views116 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Мысли выходного дня. Достаточно давно пришел к мнению, что современный tech очень другой по сравнению с тем, что было ранее. Давайте поясню. Большая часть рынка и людей сейчас в tech живут прошлым. Огого можно сделать себе дашборд, софтик для трекинга калорий или планер. Иногда эти мечты выходят за пределы личного софта и начинается игра как раньше. Мол я сделаю людям же надо. Но кажется время ушло. Мне нравится сл…

❤66👍26🤡16🤣3🔥2💯1😐1🙏1

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

30 Oct 2026, 15:36 UTC≈3,430 views98 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Накопилось много всякого, что хотелось бы написать. Там и s1 Anthropic и разные другие кризисы кредитования compute бизнеса. Но начну пожалуй с математики. Ремарка: я не ученый и тем более не математик. Но пол жизни провел в математике и достаточно плотно интересовался ей, даже в институт Стеклова при РАН ходил. Ну кто знает, тот поймет. Так вот OpenAI накинули очень сильный результат на прошлой неделе. Это не каки…

👍64🔥14💯9❤5🤡4🤔1🙏1

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

29 Oct 2026, 23:13 UTC≈3,380 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Дорогие читатели, мы активно собираем кейсы для RL для computer use, для локальной модели и чтобы быстро работало и буду очень благодарен если вы уделите минутку и надиктуете свои. Мы хотим для начала сосредоточиться именно на использовании тех приложений и возможностей, которые уже есть на вашем компьютере (встроены в ОС по сути). Самый активный/классный кейс и его автор получит от нас 1к USD на любую нейронку в вид…

❤11👍10🔥2😁1🙏1

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

23 Oct 2026, 17:59 UTC≈4,450 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Сколько вы тратите на ai для кодинга в месяц? (Ну или для других целей, но там будет поменьше)

  1. 0, пишу руками7%
  2. 20$ но тоже пишу руками достаточно17%
  3. ~100$, руками ничего почти не трогаю31%
  4. 200$+37%
  5. 1к$+7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4🔥1

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

17 Oct 2026, 14:57 UTC≈5,910 views36 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Кстати можно поиграться в браузере теперь https://uzu.run/ Пока в экспериментальном варианте, но скоро в норм виде до основой ветки доедет. В целом вполне сносно показывает себя. Кстати нужно ли завозить jev-like модели? Мне кажется особенно в браузере может быть прикольно.

❤29👍6👎1

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

8 Oct 2026, 22:26 UTC≈8,580 views41 reactions1,010 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Достаточно интересная картинка выходит

👍27🤔14

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

8 Oct 2026, 18:23 UTC≈5,920 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Отличный пиар к IPO, все-таки там сидят очень умные люди модели

😁21👍4❤2✍1🤡1

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

2 Oct 2026, 22:14 UTC≈6,880 views62 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Hot take: работать в претрен команде в топ лабах самое скучное что может быть. Все сидят там только ради денег. Prove me wrong.

😁31🤡19👍6💯6

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

30 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC≈7,170 views45 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Оказывается google что-то умеет. Ну или это просто таблица с циферками.

🤔26😁10👍5🔥4

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

28 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC≈6,210 views45 reactionsread 6 November 2026

В моей рабочей почте каждый день примерно 50 писем с темой: we've built new ai empowered gtm tool. Дальше это обычно что-то из: cold outreach automation, market research, и самое частое конечно же SEO/GEO или как там его про выдачу в чат боты. Сотни писем, большая часть написана через AI, отвечено - ноль. Почти у всех письмо построено по принципу: • в заголовке хук (например чел написал Ferrari, оказалось это назван…

👍19😁11💯10❤3💩2

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

27 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTC≈5,100 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Запустили тут небольшой эксперимент модельку, по сути очень хорошая сжатая и довольно бодрая, господа вот тестят сами (портировали даже под движок нужный) можно глянуть что получается в видео или почитать про эксперименты у ребят https://t.me/fuckup_files/1049

❤15🔥11

Signed Alexey Moiseenkov

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @chillhousetech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Oct 2026, 17:59 UTCAnonymous Poll1,420 voters approx.

Сколько вы тратите на ai для кодинга в месяц? (Ну или для других целей, но там будет поменьше)

  1. 0, пишу руками7%
  2. 20$ но тоже пишу руками достаточно17%
  3. ~100$, руками ничего почти не трогаю31%
  4. 200$+37%
  5. 1к$+7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jun 2026, 17:10 UTCAnonymous Poll836 voters

Мне закинули идею, что я могу записывать миниподкасты в виде голосовых сообщений на 2-4 минуты. Сойдет как формат?

  1. Да37%
  2. Ну такое, не люблю голосовые34%
  3. Пофиг12%
  4. Да, но плиз не часто19%
  5. 🥳14%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 63,724
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов
@bossofyourboss · 27,334
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Soonicorn jobs
@soonicornjobs · 31,175
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
Tech Crunch
@techcrunchru · 16,305
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,634
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Венчур по Понятиям
@ventureStuff · 20,267
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
Kumar & Solo
@solokumi · 40,499
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Dumik
@dumik · 21,776
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
The Edinorog 🦄
@Theedinorogblog · 43,874
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,196
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ChillHouse” (@chillhousetech), 6,748 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chillhousetech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.