Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dumik

Channel

Dumik

@dumik

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,311subscribers

-212 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001176615363
TypeChannel
Username@dumik
Created20 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dumik

Growth

22,31122,52522,4186 August 2026 — 22,523 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,525 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,512 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,504 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,495 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,480 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,484 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,476 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,469 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,463 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,459 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,456 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,451 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,442 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,437 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,431 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,424 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,417 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,412 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,400 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,399 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,395 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,390 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,385 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,384 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,380 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,373 subscribers6 September 2026 — 22,358 subscribers9 September 2026 — 22,311 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,279–22,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 09:5722,311-47
6 Sept 2026, 01:3922,358-15
3 Sept 2026, 18:4022,373-7
2 Sept 2026, 13:3422,380-4
1 Sept 2026, 14:0422,384-1
31 Aug 2026, 17:0722,385-5
30 Aug 2026, 15:5322,390-5
29 Aug 2026, 18:2322,395-4
28 Aug 2026, 17:3422,399-1
27 Aug 2026, 16:1522,400-12
26 Aug 2026, 12:4322,412-5
25 Aug 2026, 16:0422,417-7
24 Aug 2026, 15:3922,424-7
23 Aug 2026, 00:0822,431-6
21 Aug 2026, 16:5822,437-5
20 Aug 2026, 13:0222,442-9
19 Aug 2026, 11:0922,451-5
17 Aug 2026, 13:0422,456-3
16 Aug 2026, 07:0622,459-4
14 Aug 2026, 16:0822,463first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,243 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,243100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
84
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 10 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
73
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dumik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈2,180 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ребята, напоминаю про конфу сегодня расскажу про "AI ин тим": как команды проходят внедрение AI — от "нулевого менеджера покусанного вайбкодингом" через "мы сами себе написали все тулы, но теперь их поддержка занимает больше времени чем работа" до утопического "люди, агенты и Людмила Михайловна из бухгалтерии живут мирно и счастливо в team os с настроенными ai workflows ". моя секция в 19-00 по мск, а сама конфа с

4 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈6,010 views215 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

недавно прошел курс фридайвинга и в очередной раз прожил, как работает один из моих любимых фреймворков про развитие и обучение. unconscious incompetence — ты еще не осознаешь, что ты чего-то не знаешь) со стороны смотришь -- ну ок, надо нырнуть на глубину на задержке дыхания и потом всплыть, все понятно. conscious incompetence — попробовал и увидел, чего не хватает. ага, оказывается, каждые полметра надо эквализир

215

31 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈7,740 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

AI ин тим последние три месяца я делал рисерч и пообщался с 60+ командами о том, как у них устроена работа с AI: что реально работает, что оказалось фантазиями и где буксует чаще всего. половина — корпорации (Amazon, Microsoft, Kaspersky и др.), половина — стартапы и небольшие компании. основная проблема — есть AI-протагонисты, которые всё под себя настроили — промпты, наработки, скиллы. а остальная часть команды л

68

27 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC≈7,700 views228 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

случился первый WNDR фест! вот так эксперимент с онлайн сообществом WNDR, который мы начали 9 месяцев назад, пророс в собственный офлайн фестиваль. приехали ребята от ванкувера до владивостока. вау! основная идея была развиртуализироваться и, наконец, лично обнять эти ставшие такими близкими квадратики из зума. но я же не могу просто хорошо провести время, мне нужны смыслы) и я думал — чему посвятить фестиваль, к

228

23 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈12,200 views418 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

у меня есть две книги, которые я почти никому не рекомендую я когда их читал — проживал очень особенный опыт сна наяву. они каким-то образом попадали в переломные периоды моей жизни, и я поражался синхронии событий в них и у меня. доходило до того, что я вечером открывал книгу — и буквально читал ответы на вопросы, которые у меня поднимались в течение дня. сюжет мистически переплетался с моей жизнью и вел, как учит

418

21 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈10,300 views94 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

комьюнити — худший продукт с точки зрения продаж потому что ценность там непрямая, не как с продажей профессии, продукта или результата — где сразу понятна стоимость/ценность. а в комьюнити ценность может быть огромна, но видна только оглядываясь назад. вход 400 евро — а находишь партнёра, с которым дружба и бизнес на годы вход 400 евро — а получаешь окружение, не выгораешь и дотаскиваешь компанию до экзита вход 4

94

20 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC≈8,690 views263 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

я снова в игре прошлым летом я писал в #страшнопризнаться, что боюсь вернуться в предпринимательство — прошлые победы мешают идти дальше. и снова здравствуйте! нашел ко-фаундера, команду, мы в стелсе, валидируем гипотезу. что именно строим -- расскажу как приземлим) вернулся — а игра другая. свои прошлые продукты я запускал по классике стартаперства: собери лендинг, налей трафика, посчитай конверсию в «оставить по

263

15 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC≈10,100 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026

знаете, есть два типа сообществ вертикальная сборка, когда надо собрать вокруг себя максимум лайк-майндед людей, чтобы как можно быстрее пропитаться темой, научиться, выстроить связи. например, вокруг ai, инвестиций или предпринимательства. или сборка вширь — когда надо, чтобы вокруг было максимально много разных людей. об них увидеть, услышать — куда мне дальше. вдохновиться, увидеть как можно, как бывает, как под

80

8 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC≈11,200 views717 reactions73 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

я перестал серфить 3 года назад случилась травма шеи, а после нее пошла еще мышечная компенсация. привело к тому, что если посерфлю — мышцы шеи уходят в гипертонус и спазм, перестаю спать и ловлю мигрени. я два раза честно пытался решить это — находил спортивных реабилитологов, пересобирали биомеханику. но это был ад — условно, 45 минут выставляешь правильный угол наклона лопатки, не забывая при этом собирать ребра

717

24 May 2026, 10:48 UTC≈12,300 views160 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

сделал карточки, как я работаю с церемониальным какао в обычной жизни и почему этот напиток стал для меня №1, посмотрите 👆

160

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dumik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FounderWoman
@FounderWoman · 44,875
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,730
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 37,668
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 49,989
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 66,190
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Olymarkes Daily
@markesdaily · 28,367
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Linguamarina
@mogilkomarina · 56,315
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,063
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Мама в Телеграме
@mamavtelegrame · 47,413
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Денис Семенихин
@DenisSemenikhin · 34,431
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Masha Ivakova
@mashaivakova · 39,036
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 109,906
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Макс Трейси
@maxtreysi · 44,086
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
ХУЦПА <-> Женя Давыдов
@hutzp · 46,497
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Павел Гительман
@potok_gitelman · 37,808
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Карьера в топ от Анны Знаменской
@annaznamenskaya · 30,948
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Александр Кравцов | Следующий уровень
@akravtsovcom · 33,366
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Kumar & Solo
@solokumi · 37,172
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 62,370
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Алла Филина. Путь Героя
@yourgreatlife · 45,899
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Кутергин в огне 🔥
@kutergin_on_fire · 61,148
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Катерина Ленгольд
@Katerinalengold · 71,586
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Mikhail Saidov
@MikhailSaidov · 54,583
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Полина Мальцева
@polina_education · 120,758
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dumik” (@dumik), 22,311 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dumik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.