Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stay Hungry in true passion 🥷

Channel

Stay Hungry in true passion 🥷

@Stayhungryteam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,724subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001352700247
TypeChannel
Username@Stayhungryteam
Created7 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stayhungryteam

Growth

8,7238,7868,754.55 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,763 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,786 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,772 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,769 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,759 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,747 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,743 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,723 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,725 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,724 subscribers8,7245 August 20261 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 27 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,714–8,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 18:548,724-1
29 Aug 2026, 21:558,725+2
26 Aug 2026, 21:038,723-20
24 Aug 2026, 07:368,743-4
21 Aug 2026, 00:528,747-12
18 Aug 2026, 01:148,759-10
15 Aug 2026, 01:548,769-3
11 Aug 2026, 09:248,772-14
8 Aug 2026, 18:318,786+23
6 Aug 2026, 03:018,763no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:118,763+1
5 Aug 2026, 22:158,762first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 8,724 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held28 (22 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total15,619
Reactions total663
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,574 reactions across 28 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,02164.9%
🔥35722.7%
💯1127.12%
👍261.65%
💔181.14%
😁130.826%
❤‍🔥110.699%
🍓60.381%
👏40.254%
20.127%
🥰20.127%
💘10.064%
🙈10.064%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 28 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Stayhungryteam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC602 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026

В последнее время меня не покидает ощущение, что многие сложные переживание, пустота, оторванность друг от друга и потеря смысла связаны с потерей мистического, духовного в нашей жизни, что мы живем лучше, чем когда либо раньше, но за счет прогресса утратили важную часть своей самости и одновременно с этим взаимосвязности. За последние несколько веков рационализация обещала освободить нас от мифологии, неопределенно

38🔥18💔7💯3🙈1

25 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC907 views73 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Почему мы теряем смысл, даже когда получаем всё Есть вещи, которые невозможно оптимизировать: любовь, дружбу, чувство смысла. Но именно это сегодня люди пытаются делать. Ищем близость через приложения, успокаиваем тревогу бесконечно увлекательным контентом, измеряем ценность жизни продуктивностью и надеемся, что алгоритмы помогут ответить на вопросы, которые всегда решались только человеческим опытом. Социальный и

50🔥18👍4💯1

20 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC≈1,080 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Доброе утро Хочу поделиться с вами сильной историей/ отзывом о нашей прошлогодней лаборатории "Антихрупкость и развитие философского интеллекта". Когда читаю такое каждый раз понимаю зачем я делаю то что делаю, зачем толкаю этот камень в гору, зачем не иду по легкому пути и продвигаю мета навыки (словосочетание, которое мне каждый раз рассказывая о том, чем я занимаюсь минут по 5 приходится объяснять) У меня за с

27🔥5

20 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC≈1,180 views61 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @balancenorm

Почему я больше не ломаюсь от неопределенности, отсутствия контроля и непостоянства И при чем тут философский интеллект Когда я рассказала, что нам отказали в испанском внж, получила много комплиментов своим спокойствию и устойчивости. Не знаю, помните вы, но так было не всегда. Так не было буквально год назад. В конце июля прошлого (2025) года мужа сократили, и нам нужно было уезжать из США. Тогда мне будто выбили

40🔥21

17 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,290 views63 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Первому рилсу быть) Насмеялись над собой и собрали ролик про то как мы решили стать блогерами и что из этого вышло. Поддержите нас лайками, комментами и репостами, это всегда супер важно. Как говорили, когда я получала свое первое высшее - 15 минут позора и ты инженер. Тут приблизительно такая же схема😉 Собственно ролик

39🔥17👍7

17 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,400 views70 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Дефицит будущего - не технологии, а глубина мышления Послушала недавно разговор с Тони Фаделлом, который стоял за созданием iPod, iPhone и Nest. И в очередной раз нахожу подтверждение своим мыслям почти в каждом подкасте, что попадает в поле моего внимания в последнее время. Чем легче становится создавать что угодно, тем выше становится цена хорошей идеи. Поэтому Фаделл настаивает на том, чтобы мы все не сдавали св

42🔥15💯10💔2❤‍🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,220 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Вторую неделю снимаю материал для рилсов. Давно пора, лампу для сьемки я купила еще 2,5 года назад) а рилса ни одного не сделала))) Попытки конечно были, даже привлечение продюссеров и крутых видео операторов - все тщетно - мне не нравились ни идеи, ни разговоры " из позиции эксперта", ни попытки уложить готовое решение или ответ в 30 секунд, ни необходимость создавать проблему в голове зрителя и ее потом решать (о

29🔥17👍2

13 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,260 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Есть ли у вас какие то слова или выражения, которые вас бесят или вызывают вопросики? Поймала себя на том, что в последнее время меня достаточно мощно триггерит словосочетание "Ну все взрослые люди", которое, по идее, наверное должно обьяснять что-то хорошее - ответственность, зрелость людей которые участвуют в какой то ситуации. А главное должно наверное демонстрировать зрелость и осознанность человека, который ее

27🔥8💯6

12 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,350 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Провал или Опыт? Как вы относитесь к ситуациям, когда что-то пошло не по плану? Группа на поездку по Калининградской области не собралась. При этом знаю от друзей, что мою презу в качестве референса "как надо рассказывать про путешествия" друзья пересылали своим приятелям. Прошлую группу несколько лет назад я собрала почти мгновенно и думала, что за 2 месяца до выезда смогу собрать и в этот раз крафтовую классную

38🔥7

11 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,260 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Где искать смысл и опоры в эпоху неопределенности? Вторая часть лаборатории "Антихрупкость и развитие философского интеллекта" будет посвящена философии, как искусству жизни. В первой части, которую ведет Лобсанг Тенпа (бывший буддисткий монах, переводчик, востоковед и много что еще) мы учимся чувствовать и ощущать реальность через практики тибетского буддизма (большое количество терапевтических школ было вдохновле

16🔥6👏3

10 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,250 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сила не в усилиях, а в согласованности команды В каждой эпохе есть своя форма давления. Наше время давит не столько внешними угрозами, сколько тем, что заставляет человека постоянно выходить за пределы собственной версии себя. Даже не потому что «так надо» и нужно постоянно расти, а потому что реальность меняется быстрее, чем успевают закрепиться старые опоры. И именно в такой среде видно, кто умеет не только создав

29🔥9

9 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,220 views71 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

42💯17🔥12

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Stayhungryteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,826
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Заготовки с Шелушей
@zagotovki_welldone · 31,544
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Катерина Ленгольд
@Katerinalengold · 71,683
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Соколова наизнанку
@naiznankuo · 58,299
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 37,678
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Полина Мальцева
@polina_education · 120,750
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stay Hungry in true passion 🥷” (@Stayhungryteam), 8,724 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stayhungryteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.