Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -4,024. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,081–41,313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:16
36,685
-8
15 Sept 2026, 08:58
36,693
-14
13 Sept 2026, 18:15
36,707
-4
12 Sept 2026, 01:57
36,711
-19
9 Sept 2026, 19:16
36,730
-59
6 Sept 2026, 10:18
36,789
-37
4 Sept 2026, 05:59
36,826
-5
2 Sept 2026, 17:36
36,831
+3
1 Sept 2026, 17:12
36,828
+29
31 Aug 2026, 13:43
36,799
-17
30 Aug 2026, 13:54
36,816
-12
29 Aug 2026, 15:02
36,828
-30
28 Aug 2026, 13:13
36,858
-3
27 Aug 2026, 15:04
36,861
+5
26 Aug 2026, 17:33
36,856
+27
25 Aug 2026, 15:53
36,829
-5
24 Aug 2026, 16:44
36,834
-2
23 Aug 2026, 00:16
36,836
-1
21 Aug 2026, 10:06
36,837
-24
20 Aug 2026, 07:55
36,861
first reading
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 36,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,540
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
89 (30 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
226,810
Reactions total
4,038
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 01:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,510
Videos
≈61
Links
≈2,810
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,386 reactions across 85 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,239
43.9%
🔥
1,642
22.2%
👍
1,145
15.5%
😁
657
8.90%
🙏
488
6.61%
👎
153
2.07%
👏
62
0.839%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,625 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 89 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @justakindreminder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 89 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.25%
2 of 89 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,290
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,920
over 87 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanykrwEQT
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2RanynWxxFM
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Кирилл Репин, 35-летний геймдизайнер из Свердловской области, не собирался становиться биохакером: он просто хотел поскорее вернуться к тренировкам после очередного вывиха плеча. Чтобы ускорить восстановление, спортсмен-любитель решил попробовать BPC-157 — пептид, который, как считается в спортивной среде, ускоряет заживление связок, сухожилий и мышц.
За рецептом к врачу Кирилл не ходил, капсулы заказал на маркетпле…
Not-to-do list
В начале недели у нас всегда особенно много планов. Иногда так много, что мысли о том, сколько всего нужно успеть, мешают работать. Что, если сегодня составить не to-do list, а not-to-do list?
🔘Не проверять почту каждые 10 минут.
🔘Не соглашаться на каждую встречу.
🔘Не отвечать сразу на каждое сообщение.
🔘Не пытаться закончить все сегодня.
Иногда продуктивность начинается с того, что мы перестаем дел
Сервис для неспешной жизни и для тех, кто не любит читать с экрана. Подписчики отправляют ссылки на все статьи и блоги, которые не прочитали за месяц, — и получают толстый журнал.
10 способов пропустить собственную жизнь
Способ №1. Жить в режиме ожидания
Мы часто убеждаем себя, что настоящая жизнь начнется после завершения большого дела: когда закончится ремонт, появится нужная сумма, дети вырастут или наступит отпуск. Эта надежда звучит оптимистично, однако превращает настоящее в «предбанник» будущего. «Ожидание — это форма приятного для себя отказа от настоящего. Можете не успеть. Жизнь — …
Пожалуй, это самый буквальный тест Тьюринга в истории искусственного интеллекта. Алан Тьюринг когда-то помог машинам взломать немецкую систему шифрования «Энигма», а 85 лет спустя исследователь с помощью GPT-6 Astra расшифровал сообщение, которое оставалось непрочитанным со времен войны.
Официальные руководства по питанию обычно выглядят довольно скучно. Но японское Министерство здравоохранения, труда и благосостояния подошло к вопросу креативно и выпустило рекомендации в виде традиционной японской игрушки кома — это что-то вроде знакомой нам юлы.
По сути это перевернутый конус, разделенный горизонтальными слоями. Порядок слоев задан рекомендуемым числом порций: сверху блюда из злаков (рис, хлеб, ла…
Магия между тренировками
Чтобы поднять больший вес или пробежать дистанцию быстрее, организм должен физически измениться. Мышцы должны вырасти, сигналы от мозга — стать более слаженными, кислород — доставляться к мышцам эффективнее и т.д.
Но сама по себе тренировка не делает нас сильнее, объясняет Дмитрий Поломошнов, спортивный физиолог исследовательского центра CESAME при Гонконгском баптистском университете.
Она…
Как уснуть, двигая глазами
Еще один совет из книжки Protocols Эндрю Хубермана, которую мы упоминали с утра.
Сейчас вечер, поэтому совет про сон.
Допустим, вы не можете уснуть, в голове крутятся разные мысли. Или проснулись ночью. Что делать?
Лежа в кровати, закройте глаза. Не открывая их, медленно переведите взгляд вправо, затем влево, вверх и вниз, после чего опишите глазами круг против часовой стрелки, а затем …
Свежий тренд: longevity residences — жилье, в котором помимо уже привычных консьерж-сервисов и спортзалов есть инфраструктура для долголетия: биохакинг-бары, зоны медицинской диагностики, системы контроля качества воздуха и воды, лаборатории сна и «коллагенарии».
Мы обнаружили в Москве и Санкт-Петербурге 7 жилых комплексов с таким необычным велнесом (часть из них на этапе строительства). Коротко рассказываем о них в…
Правильное состояние для учебы
У популярного подкастера Эндрю Хубермана вышла книга Protocols, в которой он собрал разные методы повышения продуктивности и заботы о здоровье. Книгу он писал несколько лет, три раза полностью переписывая!
В разделе про обучение есть полезная метафора.
Чтобы эффективно усваивать материал, нужна определенная степень бодрости, возбуждения. Высокая, но не настолько высокая, чтобы перера…
Не думайте, что проблема с удержанием внимания возникла только в эпоху тиктока и пуш-уведомлений. На фото — «Изолятор», изобретение американского редактора и писателя-фантаста Хьюго Гернсбека.
Первую версию шлема в 1925 году сделали из дерева и войлока. В районе рта находился специальный канал для дыхания, а три стеклянные вставки позволяли пользователю видеть происходящее снаружи. Гернсбек считал устройство удачны…
«Умное» кольцо, которое ничего не измеряет
В кольце Pulse Ring нет датчиков. Оно ничего не измеряет и не собирает биометрические данные. В нем есть только вибромотор, который позволяет кольцу вибрировать. Вы задаете частоту вибраций — например, три раза в день — и кольцо напоминает вам остановиться, сделать вдох или вернуть внимание к тому, чем занимаетесь. Есть режим дыхательных упражнений: кольцо вибрациями задает…
❤111😁45🔥13🙏9👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @justakindreminder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@justakindreminder edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 60 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Чтобы не выгорать @notburningout · 43,857 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Мастриды @mustreads · 45,187 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Купрум @tolkosprosit · 43,068 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Намочи манту @namochimanturu · 56,525 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Соколова наизнанку @naiznankuo · 58,587 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Dumik @dumik · 22,244 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы @technohumanist · 37,699 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Йод | Лайфхакер @lh_health · 22,821 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Цифровой этикет @digitaletiquette · 24,348 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 September 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots @Matskevich · 25,302 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Теории и Практики @tandp_ru · 22,259 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
Alter @psyalter_ru · 26,886 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Критическое мышление @ThinkCritical · 47,239 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Психология @PsyEducation · 59,345 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Лидерская позиция | Андрей Шапенко @leadership_position · 27,168 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
Кинжал @Le_kinzhal · 46,565 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Рецепты Лайфхакера @lh_eda · 38,747 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Ваня Замесин @zamesin · 50,414 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Дофамин | Лайфхакер @pofixil · 25,377 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Роман Тарасенко @romarketing · 22,564 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Ноотропы и Биохакинг | RISE @mind_rise · 39,194 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
Максим Спиридонов @mspiridonov · 66,824 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
0% токсичности @stop_toxic · 34,444 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Дубынин о мозге 🧠 @dubininvaofficial · 44,337 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Reminder” (@justakindreminder), 36,685 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justakindreminder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
