Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alter

Channel

Alter

@psyalter_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,063subscribers

-205 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562890267
TypeChannel
Username@psyalter_ru
DescriptionОфициальный канал сервиса подбора психологов Alter ✅ Пробная диагностическая сессия за 490₽: https://r.alter.ru/iC7Pq ✅ Анкета подбора психолога: https://r.alter.ru/m1tK8 Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3FkwGq
Created5 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psyalter_ru

Growth

27,06327,26827,165.56 August 2026 — 27,268 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,241 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,244 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,242 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,237 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,230 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,207 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,200 subscribers15 August 2026 — 27,188 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,169 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,162 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,153 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,138 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,127 subscribers23 August 2026 — 27,121 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,099 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,090 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,084 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,076 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,063 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net -205. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,032–27,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 19:2927,063-13
27 Aug 2026, 20:2627,076-8
26 Aug 2026, 20:4327,084-6
25 Aug 2026, 23:4827,090-9
24 Aug 2026, 22:4727,099-22
23 Aug 2026, 08:1427,121-6
21 Aug 2026, 18:0527,127-11
20 Aug 2026, 13:0327,138-15
19 Aug 2026, 09:4627,153-9
18 Aug 2026, 08:5527,162-7
17 Aug 2026, 11:3527,169-19
15 Aug 2026, 19:5527,188-12
14 Aug 2026, 12:4827,200-7
13 Aug 2026, 02:4727,207-23
12 Aug 2026, 01:5227,230-7
10 Aug 2026, 23:4127,237-5
9 Aug 2026, 23:3627,242-2
9 Aug 2026, 02:0127,244+3
8 Aug 2026, 02:1227,241-13
7 Aug 2026, 01:1727,254first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.93%
avg views ÷ 27,063 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,420
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held31 (17 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total50,764
Reactions total660
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,730
Videos
70
Links
1,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,107 reactions across 31 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
60654.7%
❤‍🔥13612.3%
🔥544.88%
💯504.52%
👍443.97%
393.52%
💔393.52%
💘332.98%
🙏272.44%
😢141.26%
😍131.17%
👾70.632%
😁70.632%
🏆60.542%
🤨60.542%
🤷60.542%
🗿50.452%
🤝50.452%
30.271%
🍾10.09%
6 further kinds60.542%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC994 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Ревность к прошлому партнёра ⬇️ #вопрос_к_психологу@psyalter_ru «Почему я ревную не к какому-то конкретному человеку, а именно к прошлому партнёра?» 🔊 На этот вопрос подробно ответил Борис Никифоров — психолог Alter, клинический психолог, гештальт-терапевт, коуч. В новом аудио специалист рассказал о том, что такое ревность, зачем она нам нужна и почему ревновать может быть даже полезно для отношений. По промоко

6

27 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,470 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

11🔥7🤷6❤‍🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,700 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

163👍1💘1

24 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,720 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥17104🙏3

21 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈2,160 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Проблемы в отношениях могут привести к трудоголизму 🤯 Кажется логичным, что сложности в личной жизни должны отнимать силы и мешать работе. Но исследование голландских ученых показало: при неудовлетворенности отношениями у участников повышалась энергичность и снижалось выгорание. Как это объяснить? 🩹 Работа как замена того, чего не хватает в отношениях Согласно теории самоопределения, когда человеку не хватает близ

14🏆6💯3💔2

20 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,190 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Что делать, чтобы справиться с тревогой? Когда-то тревога помогла нашим далеким предкам выжить — может, нас с вами и не случилось бы, если бы какой-то конкретный древний человек не услышал, как хрустнула ветка под лапой тигра у него за спиной! Собственно, похожим образом эта эмоция оберегает нас и сегодня — и мы не сворачиваем в темные подворотни, не увольняемся с работы одним днем и не открываем двери незнакомцам.

15👍5❤‍🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,290 views42 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Как синдром самозванца мешает поиску работы 🫰 Мы вместе с коллегами из медиа о карьере БУДУ решили выяснить, почему голос внутреннего критика становится таким громким именно во время поиска работы 👩‍💻 Психолог Alter Анна Девятка считает, что жёсткий внутренний критик может быть эхом травмы отвержения или КПТСР. То есть когда-то давно ваша психика научилась критиковать вас «на опережение», чтобы защитить от боли вн

❤‍🔥17💔10🙏6💯53👏1

17 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈2,090 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

17💯104

14 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈2,690 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

⛔️ Как отстаивать свои границы? #вопрос_к_психологу@psyalter_ru Больше ответов на вопросы от психологов Alter ищите по хэштегу ⬇️ #вопрос_к_психологу@psyalter_ru «Я пытаюсь отстаивать свои границы, но получается довольно грубо и токсично. Часто я обижаю людей, хотя на самом деле не хочу этого. Как найти золотую середину? Или я все делаю правильно, а они обижаются, потому что я просто перестал быть удобным? Как по

15🔥4❤‍🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC≈2,820 views50 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

36🔥64🙏3💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @psyalter_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 190,597 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ок, ясно
@yasno_live · 111,668
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alter” (@psyalter_ru), 27,063 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyalter_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.