Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Страдающее Средневековье

Channel

Страдающее Средневековье

@pophistory

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

140,422subscribers

-153 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001109613847
TypeChannel
Username@pophistory
DescriptionТут чумовые вписки! Наши онлайн-курсы по гуманитарным наукам: https://t.me/stradarium1 Наш мерч: https://nmstudio.ru/
Created6 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pophistory

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

140,422140,725140,573.56 August 2026 — 140,575 subscribers6 August 2026 — 140,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 140,588 subscribers8 August 2026 — 140,606 subscribers9 August 2026 — 140,613 subscribers10 August 2026 — 140,619 subscribers11 August 2026 — 140,616 subscribers12 August 2026 — 140,596 subscribers13 August 2026 — 140,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 140,606 subscribers16 August 2026 — 140,713 subscribers17 August 2026 — 140,725 subscribers18 August 2026 — 140,693 subscribers19 August 2026 — 140,694 subscribers20 August 2026 — 140,692 subscribers21 August 2026 — 140,697 subscribers22 August 2026 — 140,692 subscribers24 August 2026 — 140,669 subscribers25 August 2026 — 140,664 subscribers26 August 2026 — 140,667 subscribers27 August 2026 — 140,638 subscribers28 August 2026 — 140,636 subscribers29 August 2026 — 140,638 subscribers30 August 2026 — 140,632 subscribers1 September 2026 — 140,615 subscribers1 September 2026 — 140,617 subscribers3 September 2026 — 140,612 subscribers4 September 2026 — 140,600 subscribers7 September 2026 — 140,573 subscribers10 September 2026 — 140,504 subscribers12 September 2026 — 140,475 subscribers14 September 2026 — 140,455 subscribers16 September 2026 — 140,438 subscribers18 September 2026 — 140,422 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140,377–140,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:01140,422-16
16 Sept 2026, 06:37140,438-17
14 Sept 2026, 10:41140,455-20
12 Sept 2026, 22:40140,475-29
10 Sept 2026, 22:40140,504-69
7 Sept 2026, 20:35140,573-27
4 Sept 2026, 21:38140,600-12
3 Sept 2026, 09:07140,612-5
1 Sept 2026, 23:45140,617+2
1 Sept 2026, 02:27140,615-17
30 Aug 2026, 23:52140,632-6
29 Aug 2026, 22:04140,638+2
28 Aug 2026, 21:06140,636-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:04140,638-29
26 Aug 2026, 14:34140,667+3
25 Aug 2026, 14:26140,664-5
24 Aug 2026, 17:33140,669-23
22 Aug 2026, 23:22140,692-5
21 Aug 2026, 12:07140,697+5
20 Aug 2026, 14:52140,692first reading

Engagement

138 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 140,422 subscribers
Avg views / post
31,600
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 138 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held138 (28 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total1,930,400
Reactions total138,407
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,140
Videos
104
Links
1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

297,418 reactions across 131 posts, in 70 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁106,19335.7%
🤣51,31317.3%
49,87116.8%
🔥24,3158.18%
💯11,0433.71%
💔7,6762.58%
❤‍🔥6,6232.23%
👍4,0841.37%
🕊3,7211.25%
💩3,2521.09%
😭2,6990.907%
🙈2,6240.882%
😢2,3990.807%
🥰2,2190.746%
🤩2,1260.715%
😱2,0710.696%
👀1,8320.616%
🌚1,3680.46%
🎉1,2630.425%
🍾1,0490.353%
50 further kinds9,6773.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311,391 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
572
across the posts below
Posts paid on
89
of 138 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
143
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pophistory. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC≈13,800 views2,007 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Кстати, нарисовали

🔥740💯637😢275😁133😭116🕊4135👻12

21 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC≈20,000 views2,064 reactions3 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Все, последние, пора завязывать

😁1,130🤣634130🔥53🗿41👍24❤‍🔥23👎12

21 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈19,100 views265 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Завтра старт курса по критическому мышлению в Страдариуме! Все знают, как важно обладать критическим мышлением. Часто мы думаем, что именно мы им уже владеем, а другим, увы, его не хватает. Но критическое мышление — это в первую очередь проверка собственных знаний и навыков на надежность и обоснованность, а также, что не менее важно, — умение корректно формулировать и убедительно обосновывать. Чему будем учиться:

162👍67🔥29🫡6🥴1

21 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC≈22,300 views2,458 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Создателям Колобка только не показывайте, а то ещё Репку экранизируют...

😁1,450🤣612🔥160😱109💯4723👾22👍15

21 Sept 2026, 07:07 UTC≈23,400 views2,881 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Крабик для волос, который всё время сползает и бесит из-за того, что тяжёлый, но красивый, зараза.

😁1,630🤣753196💯172🔥56💘21❤‍🔥17😍14

20 Sept 2026, 09:03 UTC≈25,800 views2,873 reactions9 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

говорю же сложно

😁1,820🔥464🤣36476👍53🏆29😐19❤‍🔥18

19 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC≈30,200 views3,618 reactions143 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Сложно остановиться(

🤣2,660😁422🔥296💯7166👍40👏23❤‍🔥18

19 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC≈19,500 views418 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Forwarded from @stradarium1Photo

С днём поиска старого друга 🥳🥳🥳 Нет, мы не сошли с ума (как бы вы не думали). Третью субботу сентября принято искать старых одноклассников, однокурсников и друзей детства. Может быть, ваша лучшая подружка с садика стала суперзвездой, а вы об этом и не знали? И мы старых друзей не забываем ❤️ Сегодня принесли вам промокод на самые ПрИКоЛЬнЫЕ))) курсы в записи! А прикольно обсуждать с друзьями свои астрологические п

275👍83❤‍🔥27🔥16👀5👎4😁4🏆2

19 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈20,800 views2,587 reactions2 Starsread 21 September 2026
Photo

1 в 1

🤣1,770😁402146💯87🔥54🗿42👍37😴20

19 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC≈19,300 views748 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

О, надеюсь там мое лицо этим утром Ждем

🤣424👀21855😁42🔥5❤‍🔥3💩1

19 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC≈17,300 views949 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

Приятного

❤‍🔥504😁237🔥10244🌭24🥴10👍9💯6

18 Sept 2026, 13:11 UTC≈21,200 views1,241 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Сашло на нет, так сказать!

🤣863😁208💯95🔥2616👌16🌚9🍓4

Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @pophistory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz19,300 voters approx.

Чур не гуглить!

  1. крысы не понимают латыни, на которой был составлен вызов32%
  2. по дороге в суд подзащитных караулят кошки и собаки, а рисковать жизнью ради явки никто не обязан11%
  3. повестка была зачитана днём, когда крысы спят7%
  4. суд не указал, какие именно крысы вызываются поимённо30%
  5. у крыс нет имущества, а значит, и правоспособности9%
  6. подзащитные в тот день соблюдали пост и не могли покинуть нору10%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz12,700 voters approx.

Чур не гуглить!

  1. протрубить в рог, стоя на голове5%
  2. подать королю первую чашу, стоя спиной8%
  3. исполнить один прыжок, один свист и один пук57%
  4. трижды пробежать вокруг пиршественного стола нагишом9%
  5. назвать вслух всех врагов короля и плюнуть в очаг13%
  6. поймать зубами яблоко, брошенное королевой8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTCAnonymous Poll12,000 voters approx.

Есть ли у вас хотя бы одна татуировка?

  1. Есть 🤪26%
  2. Нету 🙅‍♂️74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz13,400 voters approx.

Чур не гуглить!

  1. сворачивается в шар и катится к реке12%
  2. отгрызает себе тестикулы (мужские половые железы…) и бросает охотнику, чтобы те гнались за ними46%
  3. плюётся мускусом, отбивающим у собак нюх20%
  4. прикидывается камнем8%
  5. заводит преследователей в свою плотину и там их сгрызает6%
  6. откусывает себе хвост и уплывает8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 60 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

Бесноватая Брунгильда
@crazybriungilda · 6
6 posts
мягкое пузико 🦔
@Ezhzhzh · 13
4 posts
IllumiNAUGHTY
@CultOf_Dionysus · 10
2 posts
GennadiyThePigeon
@gennadiythepigeon · 11
2 posts
улиточный город профессора Немура
@hogsday · 464
2 posts
Жить с депрессией
@live_depression · 60
2 posts
olegbessonov_tlg
@olegbessonov_tlg · 33
2 posts
Popular Human Design Science
@phdscifi · 71
2 posts
Вальгалище
@valhallishe · 8
2 posts
Баба с возу
@Babasvozu · 47
1 post
Антигравитация с Венерой
@Beauty_with_Venera · 1,349
1 post
Дикая Львовна
@DikayaLvovna · 154
1 post
Исчезающая Россия
@DisappearingRussia · 62
1 post
Двусторонняя симметрия
@InnaSpiridonova · 64
1 post
следующая остановка [¿]
@aaaaaaaald · 227
1 post
AGACCOUNT (oriental pretty kitty)
@agaccount · 30
1 post
Французский резидент
@aida_in_france · 129
1 post
Аля Кружинина пишет роман... 🎧
@alya_writer · 413
1 post
ArtStory | Сказки и картинки
@artstoryladyshekk · 43
1 post
CzBgdn
@b96n0 · 26
1 post
Богонавт
@bogogoliks · 10
1 post
⚡cnopm⚡
@cnopmcnopmcnopm · 63
1 post
Дизайн разборочная Соболевой
@design_mamma · 397
1 post
А голову ты дома не забыл?
@didnt_forget_your_head_atHome · 236
1 post
Домкрат👯‍♀️
@domkratsokratovich · 63
1 post
НЕСКАЗКИ ⟡ от Елены Баски
@elenabasky · 4,492
1 post
Что-то на эстетском
@estetikagedonisma · 46
1 post
КУСЬ
@eto_kycb · 1,246
1 post
[Меховые] Цветы для Мии
@flowers_for_mia · 39
1 post
Natalja
@galtsovan · 32
1 post
Иберские Афины
@hist_esp · 423
1 post
Rabbit Hole
@intorabbithole · 4
1 post
Bloom's Day
@joyceday · 59
1 post
юля, зачем?
@juliabyjune · 294
1 post
МАТЬ ПЛАТОНА
@kirillovaalya · 120
1 post
Жизнь между страниц 📚
@ksenkolife · 24
1 post
Ксю, тут такое дело
@ksstakoedelo · 280
1 post
☕𝓜𝔂𝓾𝓼𝓵𝓲 𝓥𝓮𝓮𝓻𝓪🎐(не участвую в чистках!)
@mallederhty · 78
1 post
Megadobro
@megadobr0 · 142
1 post
Лекции Мераба Мамардашвили - фрагменты
@merabmamardashvili · 882
1 post
НеТелек // в мире
@not_a_tv · 59
1 post
Обряд Просвещения
@obrjadprosvet · 150
1 post
Oh!Sheet
@ohhsheet · 258
1 post
Болтушка (логопед - тоже человек)
@or_love_you_boltuska · 631
1 post
partisanpress
@partisanpress · 3,469
1 post
Тимур IT
@peer2meer · 28
1 post
Ковыряю в носу
@pickmynose · 105
1 post
Поездки, походы, турслёты, фестивали, рок концерты и местечковый туризм! 🚴🚵‍♂🏕⛺️🏞🌅🌄
@pokatimotdohnyom2 · 82
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Страдариум
@stradarium1 · 34,617
#1
Arzamas
@ArzamasLive · 59,379
#2
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,468
#3
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#4
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#5
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 838,100
#6
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#7
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 75,680
#8
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 136,933
#9
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 300,961
#10
Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,481
#11
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 176,254
#12
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#13
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,921
#14
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614
#15
Vladimir Pastukhov
@v_pastukhov · 153,117
#16
Алексей Пивоваров
@Alexey_Pivo_varov · 306,315
#17
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,158,879
#18
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 694,274
#19
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 210,902
#20
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 452,612
#21
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 165,541
#22
Воск в деталях
@olegvoskoboynikov · 13,887
#23
Faridaily
@faridaily24 · 63,127
#24
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,518
#25
Город Глуповъ
@gorodglupov · 156,244
#26
Тамара Эйдельман
@eidelman · 79,323
#27
Дабл Ять
@otsuka_bld · 160,561
#28
Денис Чужой про комедию
@fe_city_boy · 27,347
#29
Чтобы не выгорать
@notburningout · 43,857
#30
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 115,689
#31
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,324
#32
Взрывы домов. Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 166,652
#33
ШЕПЕЛИН
@ilyashepelin · 45,545
#34
ОВД-Инфо
@ovdinfo · 121,909
#35
Тут картины показываем
@artgallery · 195,341
#36
Жирный и слепой
@blindfatmeft · 5,405
#37
Скажи Гордеевой
@skazhigordeevoy · 112,642
#38
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 649,498
#39
ЭХО / Новости
@echoonline_news · 72,634
#40
Отказала модная железа
@Modnayazheleza · 95,173
#41
The Insider
@theinsider · 151,910
#42
Саша Сулим
@sasha_sulim · 57,106
#43
ASTRA
@astrapress · 343,623
#44
Бумага: всё о Петербурге
@paperpaper_ru · 92,212
#45
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,282
#46
Холод
@holodmedia · 58,493
#47
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 806,604
#48
Руконожковые комиксы
@eto_krivo · 34,462
#49
Безвольные каменщики
@kamenschiki · 56,312
#50
Вестник Мракобеса
@nikabelonika · 66,859
#51
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,509
#52
Shakko: об искусстве
@shakko_kitsune · 46,866
#53
Eto Boris Akunin
@EtoBorisAkunin · 50,742
#54
Максим Кац
@maximkatz · 161,200
#55
Лингвошутки
@lingvojokes · 21,017
#56
Лентач
@oldlentach · 261,296
#57
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 102,332
#58
Романова
@oooromanova · 19,979
#59
Денис Чужой постит своих псов
@chuzhoy_animals · 5,005
#60
Parfenon
@leonidparfenov_official · 77,538
#61
Лепра
@Lepragram · 341,206
#62
llllllll1111llllllllll
@llllllll1111llllllllll · 37,154
#63
Важные истории
@istories_media · 125,999
#64
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 176,017
#65
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,526
#66
Рживопись
@rzhivopis1 · 37,054
#67
addmeto
@addmeto · 71,835
#68
Максим Курников
@kournikov · 18,242
#69
Сперва роди
@wearespervarodi · 9,708
#70
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390
#71
Фонтанка SPB Online
@fontankaspb · 389,606
#72
Усы Пескова
@Sandymustache · 212,050
#73
Можем объяснить
@mozhemobyasnit · 461,850
#74
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 600,761
#75
Белковский
@SBelkovskiy · 67,474
#76
Vsya takaya Mongayt
@vsyatakayamongayt · 33,037
#77
На словах
@na_slovah · 6,855
#78
Илья Варламов
@varlamov · 237,049
#79
ЧТД
@chtddd · 448,363
#80
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#81
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 387,062
#82
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141
#83
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,150
#84
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 98,264
#85
Аббас Галлямов
@abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,919
#86
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,531
#87
Дежурный по Израилю
@israeltoday · 140,382
#88
baunovhaus
@baunovhaus · 36,103
#89
Архитектурные излишества
@arkhlikbez · 123,744
#90
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,881
#91
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,936
#92
Восточный Синдром
@vostochnysyndrome · 83,635
#93
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 905,528
#94
Людмила Петрановская
@lpetranovskaya · 168,368
#95
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер
@voinasordoy · 200,967
#96
Ретроградный Меркурий
@retrogrademercury · 162,931
#97

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Редакция.Наука
@redakciya_nauka · 31,883
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Страдариум
@stradarium1 · 34,617
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Arzamas
@ArzamasLive · 59,379
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,383
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Art Is New Sexy 🍓
@artisnewsexy · 25,146
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Отказала модная железа
@Modnayazheleza · 95,173
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
Журнал НОЖ
@knifemedia · 101,812
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Кот Шрёдингера
@kot_sh · 24,832
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
Рживопись
@rzhivopis1 · 37,054
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Александр Толмачёв
@detlektor · 83,528
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Руконожковые комиксы
@eto_krivo · 34,462
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык
@v_beowulf · 39,858
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Parfenon
@leonidparfenov_official · 77,538
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Странная планета
@strangeplanetrus · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
Закат Империи • Время и деньги • Андрей Аксёнов
@zakat_podcast · 31,069
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Четыре строчки без точки
@strochki_bez_tochki · 23,020
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
Армен и Фёдор
@armenifedor · 41,836
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность
@brokoledu · 43,105
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Слава Сэ | Fan
@slava_ce · 23,102
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Денис Чужой про комедию
@fe_city_boy · 27,347
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Eto Boris Akunin
@EtoBorisAkunin · 50,742
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 75,680
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Странный Юмор
@ctranno · 23,423
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 September 2026
Запасаемся попкорном
@zapasaemsyapopkornom · 41,180
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 250 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q117286602 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelSuffering Medieval
DescriptionRussian media project about the Middle Ages
X / Twitter@souffrantmitte1
Official sitehttps://sufferingmedieval.ru/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Страдающее Средневековье” (@pophistory), 140,422 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pophistory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.