Платформа по гуманитарным наукам от «Страдающего Средневековья». Искусство, история, цивилизации, религии, культура и многое другое.
P.S. Не только средневековье! 🌝
https://stradarium.ru
Нужна помощь? Пишите нам: @stradarium_support
№ 4971704648
Created
4 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +321. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,246–34,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:38
34,617
+42
16 Sept 2026, 01:41
34,575
-1
14 Sept 2026, 09:55
34,576
-15
12 Sept 2026, 19:18
34,591
-27
10 Sept 2026, 17:17
34,618
+21
7 Sept 2026, 17:21
34,597
-33
4 Sept 2026, 21:36
34,630
+13
3 Sept 2026, 07:39
34,617
+9
1 Sept 2026, 23:13
34,608
-8
1 Sept 2026, 01:35
34,616
-1
30 Aug 2026, 23:16
34,617
+3
30 Aug 2026, 01:18
34,614
+12
28 Aug 2026, 23:58
34,602
+7
28 Aug 2026, 01:23
34,595
-3
27 Aug 2026, 02:14
34,598
+18
26 Aug 2026, 00:36
34,580
-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:06
34,582
+14
23 Aug 2026, 10:45
34,568
+21
22 Aug 2026, 00:25
34,547
+17
20 Aug 2026, 19:34
34,530
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 34,617 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,420
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
105 (30 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
398,080
Reactions total
10,384
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 04:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,150
Videos
≈61
Links
≈1,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
17,665 reactions across 102 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,819
32.9%
🔥
2,799
15.8%
😇
1,731
9.80%
😁
1,616
9.15%
👍
1,598
9.05%
❤🔥
1,207
6.83%
🍓
415
2.35%
💅
390
2.21%
🤯
321
1.82%
👀
254
1.44%
😨
184
1.04%
🤪
181
1.02%
👏
155
0.877%
💔
135
0.764%
🎉
117
0.662%
😭
97
0.549%
🤔
95
0.538%
😐
86
0.487%
🥰
70
0.396%
🤣
59
0.334%
28 further kinds
336
1.90%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,029 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Представьте место, где одновременно живут Аполлинер, Модильяни, Пикассо и компания — и пока никто толком не знает, что они будущие звезды нового искусства.
Речь идет про Монмартр рубежа XIX–XX вв., где в нищете и безвестности жили и творили художники, писатели, композиторы, имена которых только через десятилетия узнает мир. Тогда Монмартр был настоящей деревней: с покосившимися домиками, мельницами, фермами. Но в те…
🏯 Вы проснулись в Древнем Китае и вот как пройдёт ваш день
Первое, к чему придётся привыкнуть: во времена Хань сутки делили на двенадцать «часов» («ши»), каждый из которых был вдвое длиннее нашего. У них были имена, и по ним вы и жили.
Вы просыпаетесь с самыми ранними петухами. Самое важное в древности происходило ещё раньше, в час перед рассветом — мэй-шуан: именно тогда проходили многие церемонии и приносились же…
Традиционный ожидаемый осенний прекрасный воскресный опросник!
Мы уверены, эту неделю вы пахали как лошадь 💪
Но как какая лошадь?
🤬 — вы недовольно кричали на всех в поле
😐 — просто прожили эту неделю
🥰 — были героем средневековой саги
😈 — настолько круты, как кони с ковра из Байё
😭 — немножко нытик
💅 — красотка с шикарной гривой
😨 — ЧТО Я ВООБЩЕ ТАКОЕ
🤯 — то же самое, что прошлая лошадь, но с большей ноткой безуми…
Жуткое в искусстве часто возникает из безобидной ситуации: герой ожидает оказаться в предсказуемом месте, но что-то начинает идти не так. Но что на самом деле представляет настоящую угрозу?
От готических новелл и мистических детективов до психологических триллеров и научной фантастики — вспомнили несколько литературных сюжетов, построенных на похожем приеме, что и лиминальный триллер «Всё закончится», который Про:вз…
С днём поиска старого друга 🥳🥳🥳
Нет, мы не сошли с ума (как бы вы не думали). Третью субботу сентября принято искать старых одноклассников, однокурсников и друзей детства. Может быть, ваша лучшая подружка с садика стала суперзвездой, а вы об этом и не знали?
И мы старых друзей не забываем ❤️
Сегодня принесли вам промокод на самые ПрИКоЛЬнЫЕ))) курсы в записи! А прикольно обсуждать с друзьями свои астрологические п…
⏰ Прямо сейчас в Страдариуме!
Открытая лекция Дианы Гаспарян «Как нам всем быть по Мартину Хайдеггеру?».
Все помнят два главных вопроса, будоражащих человечество — «кто виноват?» и «что делать?», но этот список должен быть предварен ещё более основным вопросом «как быть»? Как раз этот вопрос, который раскрывает своё философское звучание при верно проставленных акцентах, определяется Мартином Хайдеггером в качестве …
Я д’Артаньян, все — п*д#р@с*
Узнали? Вот тут д’Артаньяна и подводит критическое мышление. А что это вообще такое — объясняет Юлия Горбатова в открытой лекции. Публикуем критически важный фрагмент и напоминаем, что интенсив начинается уже 22 сентября!
Джон Дьюи, который когда-то придумал термин «критическое мышление»и довольно быстро решил, что термин неудачный. Вот «рефлексивное мышление» было бы лучше. Рефлексивно…
⏰ Прямо сейчас в Страдариуме!
Открытая лекция Алины Дадаевой «Линейность и лабиринт: как латиноамериканские писатели переосмысляли природу времени»
Время кажется нам линейным: прошлое остаётся позади, настоящее переживается как мгновение, а будущее ещё не наступило. Но литература XX века вновь и вновь ставит эту модель под сомнение, и особенно остро — у латиноамериканских писателей. У Борхеса, Кортасара, Гарсиа Мар…
Привет, с вами Алина Дадаева.
Если верить Борхесу, писатели встречались не более четырех раз. Причем о самой главной встрече — из тех, что обычно определяют громким эпитетом «судьбоносная» — сам Борхес по прошествии нескольких лет забыл. Произошла она в 1946 году в аргентинской столице, где располагалась редакция литературного журнала «Анналы Буэнос-Айреса», основателем и главным редактором которого был Борхес, в ту…
Как нам всем жить да быть по Хайдеггеру?
Расскажет Диана Гаспарян!
Все знают два вечных вопроса: «кто виноват» и «что делать» (или два извечных «зачем» да «почему»). Хайдеггер считал, что перед ними стоит ещё один, самый главный: как быть. Быть или не быть — этот выбор уже давно решён за нас. А вот КАК БЫТЬ, на это нам предстоит найти ответ.
Можно, конечно, оставить этот вопрос незамеченным. Но тем досаднее потом …
⏰ Прямо сейчас в Страдариуме!
Открытая лекция Софии Широгоровой «Война окончена! Как Германия вышла из Первой мировой».
Четыре года Германия сражалась в «великой войне» — самом масштабном и разрушительном конфликте тогдашней истории. А конец её для многих современников оказался внезапным и стремительным.
Почему германские элиты в итоге согласились на перемирие? Что решило дело: положение на фронте, политические пе…
😇89❤24👍15🔥10💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @stradarium1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@stradarium1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
отгрызает себе тестикулы (мужские половые железы…) и бросает охотнику, чтобы те гнались за ними45%
плюётся мускусом, отбивающим у собак нюх20%
прикидывается камнем8%
заводит преследователей в свою плотину и там их сгрызает6%
откусывает себе хвост и уплывает8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Страдающее Средневековье @pophistory · 140,422 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Arzamas @ArzamasLive · 59,379 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
(Не)занимательная антропология @anthro_fun · 75,680 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Кот Шрёдингера @kot_sh · 24,832 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
Армен и Фёдор @armenifedor · 41,836 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Закат Империи • Время и деньги • Андрей Аксёнов @zakat_podcast · 31,069 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Мозг на полную @full_brains · 21,979 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
Синхронизация @Synchronews · 48,783 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Тут картины показываем @artgallery · 195,341 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Рживопись @rzhivopis1 · 37,054 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Людмила Петрановская @lpetranovskaya · 168,368 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Shakko: об искусстве @shakko_kitsune · 46,866 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Рыба Лоцман @ryba_lotsman · 52,481 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Редакция.Наука @redakciya_nauka · 31,883 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Тамара Эйдельман @eidelman · 79,323 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Страдариум” (@stradarium1), 34,617 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stradarium1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.