https://arzamas.academy
История культуры в лекциях, подкастах и текстах.
Канал зарегистрирован в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3HLFhD
Чат канала: https://t.me/+8BFupbtV6UI3Yzky
Created
3 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net +491. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,814–59,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 20:41
59,379
+13
16 Sept 2026, 13:01
59,366
+34
14 Sept 2026, 14:37
59,332
+16
12 Sept 2026, 23:38
59,316
+4
10 Sept 2026, 23:39
59,312
+17
8 Sept 2026, 02:20
59,295
+2
4 Sept 2026, 21:19
59,293
-10
3 Sept 2026, 05:58
59,303
+24
2 Sept 2026, 03:57
59,279
+13
1 Sept 2026, 01:33
59,266
-5
29 Aug 2026, 20:06
59,271
+28
28 Aug 2026, 19:46
59,243
+12
27 Aug 2026, 21:44
59,231
+26
27 Aug 2026, 00:58
59,205
+13
26 Aug 2026, 04:12
59,192
+13
25 Aug 2026, 03:56
59,179
+31
24 Aug 2026, 01:03
59,148
+46
20 Aug 2026, 19:24
59,102
-2
19 Aug 2026, 21:25
59,104
+21
18 Aug 2026, 21:12
59,083
first reading
Engagement
155 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.85%
avg views ÷ 59,379 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,660
87 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 155 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
155 (31 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
405,620
Reactions total
6,300
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,640
Videos
≈156
Links
≈5,790
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,069 reactions across 153 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,281
43.8%
❤🔥
2,719
22.5%
👍
1,476
12.2%
🔥
952
7.89%
💔
684
5.67%
🕊
187
1.55%
🎉
145
1.20%
😁
101
0.837%
🥰
84
0.696%
👀
54
0.447%
😭
53
0.439%
💅
39
0.323%
🙏
38
0.315%
✍
28
0.232%
🍾
25
0.207%
😢
24
0.199%
👏
20
0.166%
🐳
16
0.133%
🤔
15
0.124%
🍓
12
0.099%
31 further kinds
116
0.961%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 155 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 155 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArzamasLive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 155 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.58%
4 of 155 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,530
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,850
over 151 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcWmp9H
3
27 August 2026
31 August 2026
2SDnjeYT7K1
1
16 September 2026
16 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Подборка про запахи!
Чем пахнут Париж прошлого, иностранец, грешник и Михаил Кузмин? Как бороться с запахом и как с помощью запахов управлять жизнью? Давайте разбираться!
🎧 Аудио
Лекция «Обоняние: запах между естественным и безобразным»
📹 Видео
Лекция «Когда мы стали обращать внимание на запахи?»
📖 Тексты
Русский дух и кожаная пушка: запахи в фольклоре
Запахи в русской культуре второй половины XIX века
Роза,…
Многие пьесы Шекспира написаны в соавторстве с другими драматургами?
Давно известно, что работа драматургов в соавторстве была довольно характерна для английского театра той эпохи. Некоторые шекспироведы теперь вообще склонны считать такой формат нормой, а индивидуальное авторство — исключением. Огромное множество написанных в соавторстве пьес не сохранилось: ни один из авторов не оказался настолько популярен, ч…
Рассматриваем картину «Боярыня Морозова»!
Как на замысел повлияло убийство императора? С кого списана боярыня? Почему она напоминает ворону? Из-за чего Суриков не следовал законам линейной и воздушной перспективы? Где на картине сам художник? И зачем нужен бегущий мальчик?
Вместе с искусствоведом Марией Чукчеевой разбираемся, как трактовать детали знаменитого полотна.
Материал подготовлен в рамках гастрольной прог…
Новый выпуск цикла «Краткая история вещей» — про стул!
Когда появились первые стулья? Как их форма указывала на статус владельца? И кто придумал самые известные модели стульев?
Рассказывает искусствовед Ирина Ефремова.
📫 Подписаться на Arzamas 📫
Telegram | ВКонтакте | Рассылка
Как показать, что вы:
— любите докапываться;
— неравнодушны к изобразительному искусству;
— знаете, как скрасить любую неловкую паузу.
Ответ один — футболки Arzamas! В нашем магазине доступны три вида футболок по мотивам наших подкастов:
— «Я ничего не ожидал, но все еще разочарован» (посвящена подкасту «Зачем я это увидел?»);
— The Awkward Pause Club (для всех ценителей подкаста «Неловкая пауза»);
— «Давайте доко…
Вчера исполнилось 115 лет со дня рождения Уильяма Голдинга!
К какому выводу он пришел, исследуя потаенные зоны человеческой природы, и почему одна из главных антиутопий XX века получила больше 20 отказов от издателей? Рассказываем в наших материалах!
Лекция Андрея Аствацатурова про Уильяма Голдинга
Выпуск подкаста «Остров сокровищ», в котором Армен Захарян рассказывает про «Повелителя мух»
📫 Подписаться на Arzama…
Завершился цикл лекций Arzamas о русской сатире в Библиотеке Маяковского в Санкт‑Петербурге!
С июня по сентябрь мы рассказывали, над чем и как смеялись русские писатели последние 200 лет и как сатира менялась под влиянием читателей. Теперь все шесть лекций доступны в записи на нашем сайте.
Русская сатира до 1917 года и после. Лекция Дмитрия Николаева
«Горькое чувство», а не «веселонравие». Сатира Салтыкова-Щедрина…
Международный пиратский день! Йо-хо-хо!
Пираты — это только мужчины? Были ли у них персональные попугаи? И чем они на самом деле занимались? Рассказываем о пиратах — настоящих, литературных, знаменитых, античных и современных.
Курс «Экономика пиратства»
Лекция «Роберт Льюис Стивенсон. „Остров сокровищ“»
Зачем становиться пиратом? Эпизод подкаста «Неловкая пауза»
Зачем пиратам «Веселый Роджер»? Эпизод подкаста «Н…
В центре города, где назначаются встречи,
Где спускаются улицы к морю покато,
В серой будке звонит городской сумасшедший,
С напряжением вертит он диск автомата.
Толстым пальцем бессмысленно в дырочки тычет,
Битый час неизвестно кого вызывая.
То ли плачет он, то ли товарищей кличет,
То ли трется о трубку щетина седая.
Я слыхал, что безумец подобен поэту…
Для чего мы друг друга сейчас повторяем?
Опустить мы с тобою з…
Что вышло на Arzamas за неделю?
● Мы запустили новый подкаст — «Москва становится Москвой»! Он посвящен истории Москвы и людям, которые стояли у истоков современного облика города. В первом выпуске обсуждаем, как в Москве появился общепит и где могли поесть москвичи.
● Дуриан, амок и ночные рынки — в новом эпизоде цикла «Слова культур» лингвист Александра Черных рассказывает про 11 слов, без которых невозможно поня…
Сегодня празднует день рождения наш любимый лектор и друг редакции Илья Доронченков!
Троекратно кричим ура и делимся с вами подборкой материалов, которые Илья Аскольдович подготовил для Arzamas.
📺Видео
Лекция «Два Сурикова»
🎧Аудио
Подкаст «Зачем я это увидел?»
Курс «Как понимать живопись XIX века»
Курс «Приключения Моне, Матисса и Пикассо в России»
Лекция «Возвышенное, примитивное, иррациональное: где в искус…
Сложный тест про валюты прошлого!
Вам нужно совершить несколько сделок, используя разные денежные системы, и не остаться с пустым кошельком. Проверьте, разбираетесь ли вы в пятаках, пиастрах, шиллингах и можете ли понять, что ценнее — 1500 французских ливров или 15 фунтов серебряной посуды. Пройти тест можно по ссылке.
Хендрик Мартенс Сорг. Рыбный рынок. Около 1650–1670 годов
Rijksmuseum
📫 Подписаться на Arzamas 📫…
🔥19👍8❤🔥6❤4🙈4😁2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @ArzamasLive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@ArzamasLive edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В одних из первых ручных фенов для нагревания воздуха использовались двигатели внутреннего сгорания.
Верю.71%
Не верю!29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Синхронизация @Synchronews · 48,783 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Правое полушарие Интроверта @artforintrovert · 55,231 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Страдающее Средневековье @pophistory · 140,422 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Полка @polka_academy · 21,845 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
Страдариум @stradarium1 · 34,617 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Евгений Жаринов - Лекции и анонсы @Evgeny_Zharinov · 29,682 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
Вокруг Света | Путешествия • История • Наука @vokrugsveta1861 · 34,426 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Дилетант | Официальный канал @diletantmagazine · 24,128 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Армен и Фёдор @armenifedor · 41,836 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Закат Империи • Время и деньги • Андрей Аксёнов @zakat_podcast · 31,069 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Лев Толстой. Лайфстайл @tolstoy_life · 59,873 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Пушкинский музей @theartsmuseum · 38,078 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
История одной картины @pic_history · 50,003 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
МЕЛОДИЯ @firmamelodiya · 36,243 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Общество распространения полезных книг @obrpk · 26,566 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
Журнал НОЖ @knifemedia · 101,812 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Искусство для пацанчиков @nastya4che · 21,808 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Тут картины показываем @artgallery · 195,341 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Теории и Практики @tandp_ru · 22,259 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
Культурный дилер @culturedeal · 31,741 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Shakko: об искусстве @shakko_kitsune · 46,866 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность @brokoledu · 43,105 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Кот Шрёдингера @kot_sh · 24,832 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
по краям @admarginem · 29,801 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arzamas” (@ArzamasLive), 59,379 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArzamasLive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.