Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vladimir Pastukhov

Channel

Vladimir Pastukhov

@v_pastukhov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

153,117subscribers

-954 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001686704553
TypeChannel
Username@v_pastukhov
DescriptionVladimir Pastukhov’s Public Channel Honorary Professor (UCL (SSEES))
Created1 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/v_pastukhov

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

153,104154,091153,597.55 August 2026 — 154,071 subscribers6 August 2026 — 154,071 subscribers6 August 2026 — 154,091 subscribers7 August 2026 — 154,045 subscribers8 August 2026 — 154,015 subscribers9 August 2026 — 154,000 subscribers10 August 2026 — 153,970 subscribers11 August 2026 — 153,977 subscribers12 August 2026 — 153,971 subscribers13 August 2026 — 153,958 subscribers14 August 2026 — 153,920 subscribers16 August 2026 — 153,856 subscribers17 August 2026 — 153,816 subscribers18 August 2026 — 153,782 subscribers19 August 2026 — 153,736 subscribers20 August 2026 — 153,699 subscribers22 August 2026 — 153,662 subscribers23 August 2026 — 153,608 subscribers25 August 2026 — 153,583 subscribers26 August 2026 — 153,578 subscribers27 August 2026 — 153,586 subscribers28 August 2026 — 153,576 subscribers29 August 2026 — 153,554 subscribers30 August 2026 — 153,537 subscribers31 August 2026 — 153,513 subscribers1 September 2026 — 153,472 subscribers2 September 2026 — 153,461 subscribers4 September 2026 — 153,456 subscribers6 September 2026 — 153,393 subscribers9 September 2026 — 153,296 subscribers11 September 2026 — 153,221 subscribers13 September 2026 — 153,157 subscribers15 September 2026 — 153,104 subscribers17 September 2026 — 153,117 subscribers153,1175 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -954. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152,956–154,239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:38153,117+13
15 Sept 2026, 08:59153,104-53
13 Sept 2026, 15:21153,157-64
11 Sept 2026, 20:01153,221-75
9 Sept 2026, 11:18153,296-97
6 Sept 2026, 02:41153,393-63
4 Sept 2026, 00:21153,456-5
2 Sept 2026, 11:47153,461-11
1 Sept 2026, 11:06153,472-41
31 Aug 2026, 07:37153,513-24
30 Aug 2026, 04:04153,537-17
29 Aug 2026, 04:33153,554-22
28 Aug 2026, 07:13153,576-10
27 Aug 2026, 04:08153,586+8
26 Aug 2026, 05:55153,578-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:55153,583-25
23 Aug 2026, 22:47153,608-54
22 Aug 2026, 04:27153,662-37
20 Aug 2026, 20:22153,699-37
19 Aug 2026, 18:17153,736first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.0%
avg views ÷ 153,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
96,500
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held57 (14 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total2,218,600
Reactions total74,677
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
68
Videos
3
Links
424

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

185,864 reactions across 55 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍74,87640.3%
❤46,94125.3%
🤔22,44412.1%
💯12,4716.71%
😢7,7244.16%
😁4,6602.51%
👎3,6951.99%
💩2,4361.31%
🔥1,4800.796%
🕊1,3000.699%
🤡1,2290.661%
💊1,1060.595%
👏8100.436%
🤮7800.42%
😭7030.378%
🤣5000.269%
💔3740.201%
🙏2510.135%
🙈2490.134%
🥴1810.097%
33 further kinds1,6540.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192,588 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
770
across the posts below
Posts paid on
55
of 57 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
109
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @v_pastukhov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC≈47,500 views1,642 reactions3 Starsread 24 September 2026

Записали с боями (с качеством связи) первую послевыборную «Пастуховскую кухню». Как бы ни хотелось проигнорировать это «важное событие», а пришлось обсудить. Один из самых часто задавааемых в связи с прошедшими выборами вопросов - а зачем они Путину вообще нужны? Ведь мог бы, как поется в популярной песенке, просто эти выборы взять и отменить. Само существование этого вопроса свидетельствует о глубоком непонимании л…

❤890👍546🤔104💯47💩14🤡13🥰9🤮6

21 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC≈60,100 views2,903 reactions7 Starsread 24 September 2026

СУЩЕСТВУЕТ ЛИ АЛЬТЕРНАТИВА ДЛЯ РОССИИ? Пост в 2-х частях. Часть вторая. 1. Пятый год войны, начатой Россией, - не лучшее время для объективной оценки природы русского общества и власти. В такой момент вся предшествующая история страны представляется лишь как предыстория катастртфы, то есть как цепочка фактов и событий, однозначным и непосредственным следствием которых стала агрессия. Так было с Германией, вся истори…

👍1,500❤637🤔493💩61🙏50💯48👎35🤡24

21 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC≈59,800 views1,686 reactions6 Starsread 24 September 2026

СУЩЕСТВУЕТ ЛИ АЛЬТЕРНАТИВА ДЛЯ РОССИИ? Пост в 2-х частях. Часть первая. Фундаментальным вопросом для осмысления остается вопрос о природе русской государственности. Является ли путинский режим частным случаем аутентичного и даже единственно возможного «хардкорного» состояния России, в которое она будет постоянно возвращаться после любых временных «лайтовых» девиаций, или для России возможны и другие устойчивые длите…

❤786👍524🤔270🤡29💩23💯22👎10💊9

20 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC≈68,500 views2,078 reactions6 Starsread 24 September 2026
Forwarded from @b_pastukhov

Сегодня в Republic вышел мой текст немного непривычного формата - «воскресная проповедь». Целиком можно прочесть с подпиской, но начало текста - ниже. В первые путинские годы Россия почти без остановок пронеслась мимо станции «наказание непослушных» и увязла на без малого два десятилетия в «наказании несогласных». Долгое время считалось очевидным, что общественный договор в России - «мы не мешаем вам править, вы не…

❤1,030👍773😭97💩49🔥39🤡29💊21🤝20

20 Sept 2026, 06:27 UTC≈69,000 views3,502 reactions7 Starsread 24 September 2026

Именно надежда на правый поворот в Европе стала для Путина мощным стимулом для продолжения войны и мотивировала его отказ от щедрого предложения Трампа, который протянул ему спасательный канат, уцепившись за который, еще год назад можно было вывернуться сухим из войны (лично я считаю это второй крупнейшей геополитической ошибкой Путина после собственно начала этой войны). То есть ради журавля из рук европейских правы…

👍1,930❤655💯368🤔343🔥57🤡51👏44👎34

18 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC≈72,700 views4,131 reactions16 Starsread 24 September 2026

Почитал первые отзывы на иноагентство Андрея Звягинцева. По сути все правы, конечно. И больно, и смешно одновременно. Вообще, вглядываясь в список, все увереннее обрастающий людьми, которые являются национальным достоянием, хочется, если уж речь зашла о кино, с гундаревскими интонациями спросить, глядя в сторону Кремля: «Это я-то тут иноагент?». Но есть еще один аспект. В целом, мне понятен кураж системы. Пошла …

👍2,360💯943❤455😁133🤔86👏58💩43😢29

18 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC≈73,100 views3,138 reactions10 Starsread 24 September 2026

К пятому году войны ее расклад становится достаточно прозрачен и на удивление примитивен. По сути, все, что нужно было знать об этой войне, было сказано о ней прямо и открыто в ультиматуме Лаврова в январе 2021 года, но почему-то он до сих пор остается недооцененным акитивом. Впрочем, непублично, теми, кому нужно, все давно учтено. 1. Это война России против Европы. 2. Америка вынесена в этой войне Россией за ско…

👍1,610❤578🤔449💯208😢90🕊65🔥44💊36

17 Sept 2026, 20:40 UTC≈82,900 views4,115 reactions12 Starsread 24 September 2026

Дело не в том, что война становится жестокой – эка невидаль. Дело в том, что она становится бессмысленно жестокой. Бессмысленной как с политической, так и с чисто военной точек зрения. Эта война очередной раз доказала очевидное: жестокость не является фактором, влияющим на ее продолжительность и, тем более, на результат. Жестокость - это свойство войны, а не ее инструмент. В том числе, жестокость как таковая ни на ш…

👍1,730😢927💯502❤479🤔142💩116🕊110🔥75

16 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC≈76,700 views2,373 reactions5 Starsread 24 September 2026

Сегодня мы попробовали на «Пастуховской кухне» жанр «ответы на вопросы». Вопросы, кстати, собираются Борисом в чате его личного Телеграм-канала. Для затравки надо бы выбрать какой-то один навскидку. Я выбираю вопрос о том, что сейчас изменилось в моих взглядах на конфликт в Украине по сравнению с 2013-2014 годами. Ответил подобно в передаче, а здесь хочу подсветить только один узкий аспект. Именно потому, что уже в …

👍1,380❤507🤔322🤡39🔥30👎28🤮24👏22

15 Sept 2026, 21:24 UTC≈90,700 views4,288 reactions14 Starsread 24 September 2026

Так или иначе, но жизнь в России после выборов сильно изменится, и вряд ли в лучшую сторону. Я ожидаю двух последствий: большой аппаратной перезагрузки, которая будет сопровождаться тектоническими сдвигами силовых плит и наездом их друг на друга, а также ужесточения мер комплектации армии. Первое затронет не только ФСБ, - о чем сейчас много говорят, - но и АП с Правительством. Второе не будет называться мобилизацией…

👍1,970❤667💯605😭381🤔324🕊127💩108🤬36

15 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC≈88,400 views5,112 reactions21 Starsread 24 September 2026

Теперь, когда к закату клонится пятый год войны России против Украины (а на самом деле - против Европы и даже Запада в целом), становится, наконец, понятно, в чем состоял главный стратегический просчет Кремля. На самом деле, кандидатов на звание главной ошибки эпохи и раньше было очень много. Чаще всего в качестве таких упоминались недооценка способности и готовности Украины к сопротивлению и недооценка готовности За…

👍3,040❤830💯669🤔262🔥111🤡56👎45💊36

13 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC≈95,400 views3,490 reactions12 Starsread 24 September 2026

Начальник управления разведки Украины в интервью Times сказал, что при имеющемся расходе ресурсов Россия к концу 2028 года исчерпает возможности для ведения войны. Мысль не новая, на этом расчете, собственно, и выстроена актуальная стратегия НАТО: не доводя дело до ядерного кипения, поджаривать Россию на медленном огне до состояния готовности, когда она вынуждена будет принять прекращение огня без дополнительных треб…

👍1,760❤772🤔518😢220💩92🔥45💊32👏25

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @v_pastukhov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 649,498
#1
Boris Pastukhov
@b_pastukhov · 24,887
#2
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#3
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا
@moscowtimes_ru · 126,476
#4
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 102,332
#5
Можем объяснить
@mozhemobyasnit · 461,850
#6
Михаил Ходорковский
@khodorkovski · 153,678
#7
Вестник Мракобеса
@nikabelonika · 66,859
#8
Пархомбюро
@sparkhomenkovoice · 28,674
#9
Еловский
@delovsky · 7,810
#10
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 905,528
#11
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 176,254
#12
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614
#13
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#14
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 387,062
#15
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 98,264
#16
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,343
#17
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 694,274
#18
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 855,067
#19
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 300,961
#20
Дудь
@yurydud · 862,341
#21
Город Глуповъ
@gorodglupov · 156,244
#22
ЭХО / Новости
@echoonline_news · 72,634
#23
openexpanse
@openexpanse · 72
#24
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 136,933
#25
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,531
#26
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,310
#27
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#28
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,441
#29
Antony Nut
@orex62 · 51,464
#30
ASTRA
@astrapress · 343,623
#31
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер
@voinasordoy · 200,967
#32
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,829
#33
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 210,902
#34
И Грянул Грэм
@gremtelegram · 113,849
#35
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 460,824
#36
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,158,879
#37
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 115,689
#38
The Insider
@theinsider · 151,910
#39
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#40
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630
#41
Генерал СВР
@generalsvr · 280,399
#42
Восточный Синдром
@vostochnysyndrome · 83,635
#43
ЧТД
@chtddd · 456,090
#44
Важные истории
@istories_media · 126,185
#45
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,282
#46
Димитриев
@russ_orientalist · 130,371
#47
АДАГАМОВ
@adagamov_online · 27,463
#48
YIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 219,033
#49
Дабл Ять
@otsuka_bld · 160,561
#50
ЭХО FM
@echofm_online · 39,446
#51
NEXTA Live
@nexta_live · 767,216
#52
Arestovich / Official
@O_Arestovich_official · 241,702
#53
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,019
#54
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 165,541
#55
Andrey Malgin
@AndreyMalginItalia · 18,797
#56
Ватное болото
@vatnoeboloto · 382,750
#57
Соловьиный Помёт
@slvn_pomet · 282,556
#58
Альфред Кох
@AlfredKochBayern · 42,046
#59
Leonid Nevzlin
@leonidnevzlin · 42,376
#60
BILD на русском
@BILD_Russian · 68,071
#61
DW Главное
@dwglavnoe · 83,157
#62
Vsya takaya Mongayt
@vsyatakayamongayt · 33,037
#63
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,921
#64
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,393
#65
KUCHER
@StanislavKucher · 31,151
#66
ЭКОНОМИСТ ИГОРЬ ЛИПСИЦ
@LipsitsIgor · 40,201
#67
ШЕПЕЛИН
@ilyashepelin · 45,545
#68
БОЖЕНА
@bozhenabozhenabozhena · 65,740
#69
Faridaily
@faridaily24 · 63,127
#70
УНИАН - новости Украины | война с Россией | новини України | війна з Росією | УНІАН
@uniannet · 706,499
#71
BRIEFLY RU
@brieflyru · 100,613
#72
Романова
@oooromanova · 19,979
#73
Интуиция подскажет
@intuition2036 · 38,628
#74
Беляков
@bellochkin · 28,978
#75
Банкста
@banksta · 438,140
#76
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,700,527
#77
SOTA
@sotaproject · 103,580
#78
Радио Свобода / Radio Svoboda (ru)
@radiosvoboda · 102,074
#79
Nikolay Mitrokhin. Public Talks.
@NMitrokhinPublicTalk · 8,583
#80
Взрывы домов. Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 166,652
#81
Вёрстка
@svobodnieslova · 113,249
#82
Inozemtsev Vladislav
@inozemtsevvl · 10,463
#83
Babchenko
@babchenko77 · 80,587
#84
INSIDER UA | Україна | Новини
@insiderukr · 2,183,396
#85
Аббас Галлямов
@abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,919
#86
Белковский
@SBelkovskiy · 67,474
#87
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,150
#88
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 75,680
#89
Александр Роднянский
@alexander_rodnyansky · 42,932
#90
Дежурный по Израилю
@israeltoday · 140,382
#91
Алексей Пивоваров
@Alexey_Pivo_varov · 306,315
#92
Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,481
#93
Eto Boris Akunin
@EtoBorisAkunin · 50,742
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вестник Мракобеса
@nikabelonika · 66,859
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Михаил Ходорковский
@khodorkovski · 153,678
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,310
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Павел Щелин. Официальный канал.
@common_sen · 82,524
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Антон Долин
@anton_dolin · 51,692
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 113,413
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,019
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,393
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا
@moscowtimes_ru · 126,476
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,343
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Живой Гвоздь
@livegvozd · 65,941
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
Тамара Эйдельман
@eidelman · 79,323
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,691
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Можем объяснить
@mozhemobyasnit · 461,850
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Babchenko
@babchenko77 · 80,587
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
БОЖЕНА
@bozhenabozhenabozhena · 65,740
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,829
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Безвольные каменщики
@kamenschiki · 56,312
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Воля/Volya
@volyamedia · 44,773
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,902
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
Город Глуповъ
@gorodglupov · 156,244
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
Людмила Петрановская
@lpetranovskaya · 168,368
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,531
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 102,332
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 160 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q20069088 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelVladimir Pastukhov
DescriptionRussian political scientist, publicist and lawyer
X / Twitter@VBP_politics
YouTubeUCQUCF1iM1Z1YqikALHqnPSQ

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Распад России (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…|url=https://t.me/v_pastukhov/473 |title=Vladimir Pastukhov |website=Telegram |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221203111009/https://t.me/v_pastukhov/473…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vladimir Pastukhov” (@v_pastukhov), 153,117 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v_pastukhov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.