Если хотите поучаствовать в обсуждении - это возможно на странице автора в ФБ, с соблюдением трёх основных правил: 1. Парламентская лексика, 2. Недопускаются оскорбления, радикализм, обсуждение личности автора и ватность. 3.Запрет на вотэбаутизм, и гики.
Created
26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,452–8,669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 09:05
8,637
-7
5 Nov 2026, 05:11
8,644
+48
2 Nov 2026, 04:20
8,596
-10
29 Oct 2026, 23:48
8,606
-12
26 Oct 2026, 14:06
8,618
+84
24 Oct 2026, 00:06
8,534
+4
20 Oct 2026, 20:27
8,530
-23
17 Oct 2026, 15:41
8,553
-11
15 Oct 2026, 00:39
8,564
+19
11 Oct 2026, 15:56
8,545
-11
5 Oct 2026, 01:18
8,556
+6
26 Sept 2026, 06:21
8,550
-33
17 Sept 2026, 01:00
8,583
-9
13 Sept 2026, 10:58
8,592
-11
9 Sept 2026, 23:41
8,603
+26
4 Sept 2026, 15:36
8,577
+27
1 Sept 2026, 05:36
8,550
+42
29 Aug 2026, 03:26
8,508
-12
26 Aug 2026, 03:43
8,520
+43
23 Aug 2026, 12:56
8,477
first reading
Engagement
177 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.6%
avg views ÷ 8,637 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,420
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 177 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
177 (31 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
187,936
Reactions total
3,051
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 00:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈736
Videos
≈1
Links
≈1,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
9,601 reactions across 171 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,753
18.3%
👍
1,643
17.1%
💯
869
9.05%
😢
867
9.03%
❤
704
7.33%
🔥
510
5.31%
🤣
364
3.79%
🤔
356
3.71%
😱
308
3.21%
🥱
230
2.40%
🤯
168
1.75%
🥴
158
1.65%
👏
157
1.64%
🤡
138
1.44%
🖕
130
1.35%
💊
120
1.25%
😭
96
1%
💩
70
0.729%
👎
68
0.708%
🤝
68
0.708%
37 further kinds
824
8.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 175 of the 177 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,960 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (30.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Опубликовал вчера мемуар Эллы Митиной о дочери Райкина, но не было времени проверить.
За меня, за всех возмущавшихся Аркадием Райкиным и его супругой тут, и за почти 600 возмущавшихся комментаторов на страницы Митиной это сделал Лев Левин. Который выяснил, по опубликованной и общедоступной хронике театра Райкина, что история более чем на половину фейкова.
Никто трехлетнюю девочку из московской гостиницы неизвестной т…
Украинские и проукраинские паблики радостно публикуют данные о том, что украинские хакеры вскрыли базу данных Росстата и обнаружили там, что российские потери составили около 400 тыс. человек с 2022 г. И это мол, ещё не всех посчитали. Лежат в лесополосах, там сям.
Я вот ничего не имею против, допустим, безвозвратных потерь полмиллиона.
Просто завтра те же паблики будут публиковать очередной месячный отчет украинског…
И вот получается, что Украина для обороны НАТО играет ту же роль, что Израиль для "коллективного Запада", Илон Маск и его корпорации для технологического развития США (во всяком случае в космической, средств связи, робототехнической и автомобильной отраслях).
Небольшой игрок получающий солидное внешнее правительственное финансирование оказался на два порядка успешнее уже сложившихся и забронзовевших полугосударственн…
На "Инсайдере" вышел небольшой фильм с моим участием к скорому юбилею патриарха. Должен, кстати, отметить, что у журналистов впервые за долгие годы не всплыла тема его "несметных богатств" (их реально и нет) и скандала с экспортом табачно-алкогольных изделий (к нему он был причастен напрямую, но далеко не один в руководстве РПЦ), а интервьюируемые про этот аспект дружно забыли. Война всё вытеснила. Я вот про финансов…
"Деколонизируй это".
Uran Uranuch
Взаимодействие кыргызов и башкиров в паутине истории глазами башкирских историков. Среди башкиров проживают компактно и можно сказать обособленно енисейские кыргызы, которые знают свою историю и происхождение. Енисейские кыргызы проживают в районах между Татарстаном и Башкортостаном несколько десятков сел, в том числе:
в Башкортостане (38 селений), где исторически проживали кыргызски…
Что то в этом сообщении мне кажется странным. Не могу понять что.
"Хэллоуин на Арбате в Алматы закончился массовыми задержаниями
В социальных сетях появилась информация о массовых задержаниях во время празднования Хэллоуина на Арбате в Алматы. По словам очевидцев, молодые люди пришли на пешеходную улицу в праздничных костюмах, однако вечер закончился проверками и задержаниями со стороны полиции, передает ИА «NewTime…
Московская милиция так иззавидовалась своим французским коллегам, что решила устроить митинг неформальной молодежи, с перспективой перехода в массовые беспорядки с участием их родителей прямо на своей территории по адресу, Москва, Ведерников переулок, 9, стр. 1.
Отличный почин, я считаю. И район выбрали, который не жалко.
До сих пор есть люди, которым приходится объяснять очевидное. Но давайте займемся просветительством снова.
В мире есть ограниченное количество действительно крупных игроков-экспортёров на рынке нефти и нефтепродуктов.
Например, их шесть-семь, можно досчитать до десяти, но не принципиально.
Россия из них входит в топ три или два, когда как.
Мировой рынок реагирует повышением цен уже тогда, когда поставки из кого-то в …
«Т-34» («Марс Медиа Энтертейнмент», 2018)
Идеальное развлекательно-познавательное современное кино для молодежи про вторую мировую или великую-отечественную, кому что нравится. Хотя основной сюжет – бегство советских пленных танкистов с тренировочного полигона для немецких военных – полностью выдумано, в сценарии много натяжек и условностей, первая часть истории как советский танк перебил семь немецких в подмосковно…
Вы все, конечно, с нетерпением ждали возможности прочесть мою военную сводку в свободном доступе на немецком языке.
Вот она: https://zeitschrift-osteuropa.de/blog/schwerer-brocken/
"Нептунами" по "Протону"...
Гул над городом.
Горит "Кристалл"
Взрывается "Алмаз"
И обыватель протирает глаз,
проснувшись ночью
из-за громких звуков.
И НПЗ за городом горит
И губернатору поставили "на вид"
Что был сегодня он не слишком расторопен.
😁17🌚3🤯3😢3
Signed Nikolay Mitrokhin
Showing the 12 most recent of 177 posts we hold for @NMitrokhinPublicTalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@NMitrokhinPublicTalk edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Подосокорский @podosokorsky · 29,658 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Как бы Mikhail Vinogradov @Vinogradov74 · 28,104 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Бедный Рюрик @akalitin · 30,375 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
baunovhaus @baunovhaus · 35,639 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Kynev @alexander_kynev · 19,504 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 September 2026
Книжные Подборки @knizhnye_podborki · 22,671 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
ОНА РАЗВАЛИЛАСЬ @ussrchaosss1 · 20,430 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
Толкователь @tolk_tolk · 126,370 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Шулика @kshulika · 56,795 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Колезев ☮️ @kolezev · 59,196 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Andrey Malgin @AndreyMalginItalia · 18,613 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
One Big Union @one_big_union · 20,020 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
Николай Травкин @NTravkin · 25,081 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Кураев @akuraev · 26,801 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
Православие и зомби @orthozombies · 31,012 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Тени Руси @tenirusi · 24,875 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Интуиция подскажет @intuition2036 · 37,645 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Тайная политика @taina_polit · 137,412 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Boris Pastukhov @b_pastukhov · 24,651 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
Vladimir Pastukhov @v_pastukhov · 152,013 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Воля/Volya @volyamedia · 47,129 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
Временное правительство 2.0 @neoreshkins · 28,810 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
The Moscow Times. Мнения @moscowtimes_opinion · 21,025 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен @ve4niyvoy · 112,499 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Лагута, Геннадий Николаевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…web|url=https://t.me/NMitrokhinPublicTalk/518|title=Telegram: Contact @NMitrokhinPublicTalk|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220519103053/https://t.me/…” read 1 November 2026
Пожар в гостинице «Россия»(ru.wikipedia.org) “…фильм «[[Человек, который закрыл город]]» (1982){{Cite web |url=https://t.me/NMitrokhinPublicTalk/3465 |title=Telegram: Contact @NMitrokhinPublicTalk<…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nikolay Mitrokhin. Public Talks.” (@NMitrokhinPublicTalk), 8,637 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NMitrokhinPublicTalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.