Настоящее торжество неполиткорректности.
Для связи, сотрудничества, рекламы @kirill_shulika
Канал в перечне Роскомнадзора
https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6787dcef8f8bd4206f838c64
GB
Created
10 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3,954. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,970–56,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 11:38
51,563
-22
20 Aug 2026, 11:58
51,585
-726
19 Aug 2026, 08:44
52,311
-45
18 Aug 2026, 08:33
52,356
-55
17 Aug 2026, 11:47
52,411
-1,135
16 Aug 2026, 02:49
53,546
-66
14 Aug 2026, 09:28
53,612
-859
13 Aug 2026, 00:45
54,471
-46
12 Aug 2026, 03:22
54,517
-54
11 Aug 2026, 05:48
54,571
-724
10 Aug 2026, 02:24
55,295
-90
8 Aug 2026, 23:51
55,385
-73
7 Aug 2026, 21:10
55,458
-30
6 Aug 2026, 22:28
55,488
-29
6 Aug 2026, 01:45
55,517
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
55,517
first reading
Engagement
444 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.00%
avg views ÷ 51,563 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
444 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
444
of 444 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 424 of 444 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
444 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
459,000
Reactions total
6,700
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 01:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈18,000
Videos
≈2,790
Links
≈21,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 05m
Average length
2m 07s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,469 reactions across 408 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,726
26.7%
👎
1,607
24.8%
👍
976
15.1%
😢
616
9.52%
😱
497
7.68%
❤
476
7.36%
🔥
347
5.36%
🤩
115
1.78%
🎉
109
1.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 424 of the 444 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,700reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 444 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 444 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kshulika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 444 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Премьер Михаил Мишустин изменил перечень медицинских ограничений для управления автобусами, трамваями, троллейбусами и грузовиками.
Раньше к управлению этими транспортными средствами не допускались люди, у которых отсутствует или сильно деформирована рука или нога.
Теперь противопоказанием является либо отсутствие обеих рук или кистей, либо деформация, мешающая движению кистей.
10 августа глава Бурятии Алексей Цыд…
Многие уже отметили в этом опросе то, что большинство хотело бы изменить политический курс, а не вернуть СССР. Правда, сюда входят и те, кто хотел бы большей интеграции с Западом, и те, кто считает, что России мало изоляционизма. Но тем не менее показательное первенство этого ответа.
Но меня поразило другое... Всего 3% сказали, что не допустили бы Великую Отечественную войну. И это к вопросу о готовности общества к …
ЭКСПЕРТНЫЙ ВЗГЛЯД. Аналитики агентства «Фабрика смыслов» оценили предвыборные стратегии парламентских политических партий по пяти критериям: предвыборные съезд и программа, партийный список, региональные активности лидеров партий и работа с электоратом конкурентов. Какие предвыборные стратегии политпартий превалируют сегодня, какие нестандартные практики сегодня имеются – в очередном обзоре «Старой площади».
Медиат…
Странные такие споры о том, случайно ли или нет был обретены мощи Дмитрия Донского.
Тут не о чем спорить, потому что работы в Архангельском соборе Кремля, где веками хранится саркофаг, плановые. Там работали археологи и, кстати, не впервые. В 19 веке саркофаг тоже вскрывали.
Если ты ведешь плановые археологические работы и знаешь, что ищешь, точно себе представляешь, то странно говорить о случайности.
🇷🇺Подписывай…
«Шахтер» будет играть на «Стэмфорд Бридж» матчи Лиги Чемпионов.
Ну что тут сказать...
В троллинг лучше, чем в футбол умеют.
🇷🇺Подписывайтесь на канал "Шулика" в МАХ
Строящийся авианосец США могут назвать в честь Дональда Трампа, идею рассматривают в руководстве ВМС страны, сообщает телеканал NBC News.
Изначально судну планировали дать имя в честь Дориса Миллера — первого темнокожего матроса, которого наградили Военно-морским крестом. Он принимал участие в отражении нападения на Перл-Харбор в 1941 году.
Очень прямо символично...
🇷🇺Подписывайтесь на канал "Шулика" в МАХ
Николая Бондаренко оштрафовали на 1000 рублей за использование экстремистской символики. Но главное наказание - снятие с выборов.
🇷🇺Подписывайтесь на канал "Шулика" в МАХ
ФИФА оштрафовал и дисквалифицировал трех футболистов сборной Аргентины по итогам финала Чемпионата мира.
Полузащитник Леандро Паредес был дисквалифицирован на 10 матчей, ему был назначен штраф в размере $90 тыс. Также дисциплинарные санкции были применены к защитнику Науэлю Молине и полузащитнику Тьяго Альмаде: Молина был дисквалифицирован на 7 матчей и оштрафован на $90 тыс., Альмада получил дисквалификацию на один…
Псковское отделение «Родины» требует снять «Яблоко» с выборов в Пскове
Об иске, который будет рассмотрен 25 августа, сообщила пресс-служба псковских судов.
Я думаю, что это пойдет по всем регионам, где участвует "Яблоко".
🇷🇺Подписывайтесь на канал "Шулика" в МАХ
Губернатор Тульской области Дмитрий Миляев встретился с девочкой, которая в городе Болохово нарисовала "Смешариков" на детской площадке, и предложил ей проработать образ Филипка из рассказа Л. Н. Толстого.
Ну, собственно, два брата - Колобок и Филипок.
🇷🇺Подписывайтесь на канал "Шулика" в МАХ
Showing the 12 most recent of 444 posts we hold for @kshulika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 444 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 15,034 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Московский Инсайдер @moskovskiyPul · 164,053 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Fake Control @fakecontrol · 107,406 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
Закулисная политика 👁🗨 @sekret_msk · 121,764 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Одет аккуратно. Борода черная @oabch · 248,387 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Навстречу Трансферу @hellotransfer · 425,115 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ВАРИАНТ @variantnews · 132,531 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Кремлёвский безБашенник @kremlebezBashennik · 66,926 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Daily Storm @stormdaily · 73,303 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
ПолитГид @explaining · 106,439 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 15 August 2026
Методичка @metodi4ka · 85,692 Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Бондаренко, Максим Викторович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…в возрасте 44 лет на рабочем месте от сердечного приступа[https://t.me/kshulika/102366 Telegram: View @kshulika]…” read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шулика” (@kshulika), 51,563 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kshulika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.