Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
53 measurements spanning 82 days, net -229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 457,199–464,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 18:56
461,256
-68
25 Oct 2026, 17:06
461,324
+153
24 Oct 2026, 19:26
461,171
+215
23 Oct 2026, 18:37
460,956
-382
22 Oct 2026, 20:10
461,338
+13
21 Oct 2026, 15:35
461,325
-117
20 Oct 2026, 14:48
461,442
-75
19 Oct 2026, 14:00
461,517
-80
18 Oct 2026, 12:59
461,597
+130
17 Oct 2026, 15:37
461,467
+192
16 Oct 2026, 18:07
461,275
+9
15 Oct 2026, 19:10
461,266
+106
14 Oct 2026, 16:59
461,160
+233
13 Oct 2026, 10:59
460,927
+526
9 Oct 2026, 05:40
460,401
-1,179
4 Oct 2026, 16:17
461,580
-2,510
26 Sept 2026, 13:58
464,090
+2,240
19 Sept 2026, 15:02
461,850
+38
17 Sept 2026, 03:16
461,812
-154
15 Sept 2026, 04:36
461,966
first reading
Engagement
508 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 461,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
84,400
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.318%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
175
of 508 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held
508 (3 August 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total
14,174,500
Reactions total
45,123
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Oct 2026, 05:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,110
Videos
≈1,030
Links
≈6,290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 18m
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
147,556 reactions across 481 posts, in 64 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30,509
20.7%
🤬
28,794
19.5%
🤣
17,498
11.9%
💊
14,651
9.93%
👍
11,009
7.46%
😁
8,889
6.02%
😡
8,470
5.74%
💯
3,262
2.21%
🔥
2,297
1.56%
👎
1,793
1.22%
👏
1,663
1.13%
😢
1,631
1.11%
🕊
1,545
1.05%
🤪
1,474
0.999%
🤔
1,281
0.868%
🙈
1,275
0.864%
😭
947
0.642%
🤯
943
0.639%
⚡
733
0.497%
😱
615
0.417%
44 further kinds
8,277
5.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 493 of the 508 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151,203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 508 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
91
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 493 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mozhemobyasnit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 508 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.197%
1 of 508 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
72,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
75,600
over 492 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 508 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🔥 Подписывайтесь на главный независимый канал о событиях в Беларуси и мире — Хартия-97!
🇷🇸 Сербия меняет курс? Вучич проиграл выборы, и теперь Балканы ждёт глобальная пересборка.
🕊 Где и когда пройдут мирные переговоры по Украине? Разбираем ключевые условия, формат и следим за развитием событий в режиме реального времени.
⚖️ Лукашенко отдал приказ убить? Юрий Гаравский признан виновным в похищении Анатолия Красовс…
💸🌡 «Терпит, терпит, терпит, а потом вдруг все сразу сыпется». Дмитрий Орешкин — о том, когда недовольство россиян может стать реальной проблемой для режима
Россияне в соцсетях стали активнее аппелировать к Путину, жалуясь на игнор со стороны чиновников и рост расходов. Может ли это раздражение обернуться политическим кризисом? Об этом «МО» поговорил с политологом Дмитрием ОРЕШКИНЫМ.
📌 Раздражение растет, но до масс…
🫂🫂 «ChatGPT говорит, что ты не права»
👩🏻🦱 Москвичка Яна рассказывала чат-боту практически обо всём, что происходило в ее отношениях. Опасаясь напугать своего парня слишком прямыми вопросами, она полагалась на мнение ИИ-агента, который, как вспоминает девушка, прекрасно ее понимал.
Постепенно Яна так отдалилась от своего парня, что однажды спросила у бота, не пора ли прекращать их роман. ИИ-агент ее поддержал. Вско…
🤦🏻♂️⚰️Айтишник завербовался в «БПЛА-войска», а потом пропал без вести в мясном штурме.
Изначально разработчику из Челябинска обещали должность оператора беспилотников, а на деле его отправили в 1437-ю мотострелковую бригаду с неофициальным названием «Черные гусары» в Самарской области. Военных этого полка подозревают в расстреле мирных украинцев под Киевом в 2022 году. Также в этом подразделении практикуют пытки и …
❗️Блокировок в России больше не будет
13.000.000 рублей и 35 программистов из 7 стран – столько ресурсов понадобилось, чтобы создать FlyVPN
Он работает на новейших протоколах шифрования UZIRO, которые РКН не видит и не может заблокировать физически.
И даже когда интернет начнут глушить на всю мощность, у вас будут стабильно работать Telegram, Youtube и другие сервисы.
Безлимитный трафик, автовыбор быстрого сервер…
🚗👁 «Закон Яровой» — под капот. В Госдуме предложили взять под контроль передачу данных от иномарок. Цифровые нововведения будут оплачиваться самими водителями
В российском парламенте — все больше попыток регулировать цифровое взаимодействие государства с автомобилистами. Вслед за законопроектом о создании национального навигатора в нижней палате анонсировали новую инициативу — использовать для контроля над автотранс…
Касьянов: После 3 ноября в США будут большие проблемы. Думаю, что Трамп не признает итоги выборов, могут быть уличные протесты
Бывший премьер-министр россии Михаил Касьянов считает, что сейчас, перед выборами в Конгресс США, лучше не злить президента США Дональда Трампа, чтобы минимизировать риск непродуманных решений с его стороны. После выборов, по его мнению, давление на Украину может ослабнуть, поскольку США буд…
😡💸 «Чтобы питаться, надо брать кредит», «жить становится просто невозможно». Россияне в соцсетях стали активнее аппелировать к Путину, жалуясь на отказы чиновников и новые поборы
Семейная ипотека для родителей с одним ребенком подорожала: с 1 октября базовая ставка по новым договорам на покупку квартиры — 10% в большинстве регионов и 12% в Москве, Петербурге и их областях. Но жалобы семей не ограничиваются жильем: д…
✊🇷🇸«Вучич уходит — студенты побеждают». Молодежь Сербии всю ночь праздновала победу над близким к Кремлю правителем. Путин теряет предпоследнего друга в Европе
Сербия масштабно празднует победу на выборах оппозиции над партией экс-президента Александр Вучича, занимавшего высшие посты с 2014 года. На улицах ликующего Белграда после закрытия избирательных участков побывал корреспондент «МО».
🔹️️В Белграде люди вышли…
🎃 💒️️️️️️🛢В Чите объявили войну «людями с рожками»; Сечин пошел против армии, Макрон — против Трампа, а Трамп — против Украины
Интриги и парадоксы недели — в дайджесте публикаций популярных тг-каналов
🔹ЕЩКИН КРОТ. Сезон борьбы с Хэллоуином открыт. В Чите вечеринку «Ночь грешников» отменили после жалоб «неравнодушных» горожан. «Наших детей разлагают за наши же деньги!» — писали в доносах читинцы, хотя костюмированно…
Пономарев о подготовке покушения на него: До сих пор действовал мораторий, что американцы ничего не делают в рф, а россия — в Америке
В сентябре ФБР США заявило, что россия готовила убийство российских оппозиционеров в США и вела за ними слежку. Обвинения заочно предъявили пятерым членам группы. Позже стало известно, что российские агенты могли готовить убийство в США Гарри Каспарова и Ильи Пономарева.
Пономарев ра…
🤔88❤38🤣13👀9💊8😁6🤬4😐3
Showing the 12 most recent of 508 posts we hold for @mozhemobyasnit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mozhemobyasnit edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 86 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 136 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бедный Рюрик @akalitin · 30,010 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
KUCHER @StanislavKucher · 30,918 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Vladimir Osechkin | Official @NetGulagu · 111,027 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
День опричника @oprichniksday · 33,861 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
Россия против войны @russia_gde · 34,554 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Рыбья голова @okun_andrew · 20,381 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
Москва против войны @msk_gde · 36,848 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Малюта Скуратов @mskuratov · 65,535 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
ЧТД @chtddd · 458,520 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
Narrative Досье @narrativeru · 29,403 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
ДОКИНЗ @dokinz · 19,658 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
Пацифист @pacifist_rus · 27,693 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Русский декаданс @beregofic · 36,562 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Vladimir Pastukhov @v_pastukhov · 152,256 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Глобальный кризис @global_crysis · 21,469 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Leonid Volkov @leonid_volkov · 21,994 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Пауки в банке @bankuyte · 62,333 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Вадим Савицкий [Когнитивный надзор] @cognitivniynadzor · 24,931 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Vsya takaya Mongayt @vsyatakayamongayt · 33,041 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
Навальный LIVE @navalnylivechannel · 40,159 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Атеист @atheism · 42,712 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Колезев ☮️ @kolezev · 59,416 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Д-р Соловей @VDSolovey · 81,882 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
Аббас Галлямов @abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,232 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 314 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
54 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
1 of 54 shown as text only, not a link. The exact host, not merely a domain it shares a registrable root with, matches a threat-intelligence blocklist this register already checks elsewhere (see methodology) — the link still appearing in a post is still a measured fact and is still shown, but no anchor is rendered here, so no click and no link equity passes to it from this page.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
5 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Margarita Simonyan(en.wikipedia.org) “…|url=https://t.me/mozhemobyasnit/23124 |access-date=2026-04-24 |website=Telegram}}{{Cite web |title=Книгижарь |url=https://t.me/bookngrill/9537…” read 25 October 2026
Yekaterina Mizulina(en.wikipedia.org) “…of 200 million rubles.{{Cite web |title=Можем объяснить |url=https://t.me/mozhemobyasnit/17816 |access-date=2026-06-15 |website=Telegram}}
==References==…” read 25 October 2026
Readovka(ru.wikipedia.org) “…[[Пригожин, Евгений Викторович|Евгения Пригожина]]{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/mozhemobyasnit/12056|title=Можем объяснить|website=Telegram|access-date=…” read 25 October 2026
Бои в Курской области (2024—2025)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…резервов писали и российские телеграм-каналы{{cite web|url=https://t.me/mozhemobyasnit/18598|title=«Все ушли на фронт». В Курской области не оказалось…” read 25 October 2026
Марков, Сергей Александрович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…удалила со своего сайта страницу Сергея Маркова{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/mozhemobyasnit/21382|title=Можем объяснить|website=Telegram|access-date=…” read 25 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Можем объяснить” (@mozhemobyasnit), 461,256 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mozhemobyasnit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
