Channel
@libertypeople
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
97,317subscribers
+723 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001096478352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @libertypeople |
| Description | Общество, экономика, сарказм и критическое мышление По рекламе – @libertymanager Помощники – @politmanagertg, @smotrcirk3, @strangelovedr, @smotrcirk4 |
| Created | 1 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/libertypeople |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 97,317 | +255 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 97,062 | +16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 97,046 | +310 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 96,736 | -17 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 96,753 | +5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 96,748 | -80 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 96,828 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 96,839 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:26 | 96,864 | -31 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 96,895 | -32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 96,927 | -45 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 96,972 | +28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 96,944 | +93 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 96,851 | +144 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 96,707 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 96,731 | -38 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 96,769 | -73 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 96,842 | -50 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 96,892 | -32 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 96,924 | first reading |
396 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 244 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 396 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,719,380 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 10:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 161 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @libertypeople. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 396 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На прошедших выборах зафиксировали всего два случая вброса бюллетеней – ЦИК «На всю страну, на всех 90 с лишним тысячах избирательных участков у нас произошло всего два таких неприглядных факта», – заявила Элла Памфилова. По её словам, виновные будут наказаны. Случаев непризнания итогов выборов на участках нет, а открытость и прозрачность российских выборов в ЦИК назвали большим достижением. Также Памфилова заявил…
«Единая Россия» может получить самую большую фракцию в своей истории По последним предварительным данным ЦИК, партия набирает 57,83% голосов и лидирует в 209 из 225 одномандатных округов. В зависимости от итогового распределения мандатов ЕР может получить от 348 до 356 мест в Госдуме. Предыдущий рекорд партии – 343 депутата по итогам выборов 2016 года. Фактически это позволит ЕР самостоятельно принимать решения в …
Кадыров победил на выборах главы Чечни с рекордными 99,85% голосов ЦИК обработал 100% протоколов. Остальные два кандидата получили по 0,05%. Это лучший результат Кадырова за всё время участия в прямых выборах главы республики: в 2016 году он набрал 97,94%, в 2021-м – 99,70% Liberty People
«Единая Россия» набирает 57,04% после обработки 34,29% протоколов и получает конституционное большинство в Госдуме Партия получает более 300 из 450 мандатов. В Москве кандидаты от «Единой России» забирают все 16 одномандатных округов. 🟢Памфилова заявила, что акция радикальной оппозиции по срыву выборов в России полностью провалилась, а явка стала рекордной: «ЦИК многое сделал для этого»; 🟢Лавров назвал результаты …
Россию не волнует, признает ли Запад итоги выборов, только россияне определяют легитимность власти в РФ – вице-спикер Госдумы Толстой Ну тут не поспоришь. Как пить дать. Liberty People
Выборы в Госдуму завершились по всей России – все избирательные участки закрылись После обработки первых протоколов «Единая Россия» набирает 57,54% голосов по партийному списку, следует из первых данных ЦИК. «Единая Россия» – 57,54% КПРФ – 13,67% ЛДПР – 9,27% «Новые люди» – 7,96% «Справедливая Россия» – 5,16% Медведев уже заявил, что результаты экзитполов свидетельствуют о том, что «Единая Россия» «выступила досто…
Россиянам предложат «патриотический туризм» по местам боёв в Курской области В подземных командных пунктах и других оборонных объектах планируют создавать туристические маршруты и музейные пространства, заявил губернатор Александр Хинштейн. Отдельно хотят открыть для посещения места, где находились северокорейские военные. «Я уверен, что приехать и посмотреть подземные командные пункты будет очень и очень интересно…
Памфилова обвинила уехавших из России в провокациях против выборов и призвала их «покаяться» По словам главы ЦИК, часть покинувших страну россиян участвует в провокациях иностранных государств против российских выборов. «Вместо того, чтобы покаяться, признать свои ошибки, вернуться в страну и работать на её усиление и возрождение, участвуют в этой грязной игре против своей страны», – заявила Памфилова Также она со…
❗️ Не стоит сложа руки ждать мобилизации после выборов — лучше оценить риски и начать готовиться уже сейчас Пацифист создал анонимный Калькулятор риска мобилизации. Потратив 2 минуты и не оставляя никаких персональных данных, вы можете оценить свой риск мобилизации на основании особенностей вашей ситуации, актуального законодательства и практики прошлой волны. На выходе — оценка риска по 100-балльной шкале, анализ в…
Лидер «Яблока» Николай Рыбаков испортил бюллетени на выборах в Госдуму Он написал на них «За мир» и «За соглашение о прекращении огня». Такой вариант голосования предусмотрен «планом Б» партии там, где кандидатов «Яблока» нет. Liberty People
«Единая Россия» набрала 53,5% по итогам второго дня голосования – данные федерального экзитпола КПРФ получила 14,5%, ЛДПР – 10,1%, «Новые люди» – 8,4%, «Справедливая Россия» – 6%, Партия пенсионеров – 2,8%. Ещё 1,5% испортили бюллетень, а 37% опрошенных отказались отвечать на вопросы интервьюеров Liberty People
Москва и Подмосковье подверглись массированной атаке БПЛА По словам Собянина, со вчерашнего дня на всех рубежах сбито и подавлено более 1600 дронов, из них 450 – на подлёте к Москве. Несколько беспилотников достигли территории Московского НПЗ в Капотне. Также один БПЛА попал в жилой дом в Москве, погибших нет. 🟢Более 30 рейсов не смогли приземлиться в московских аэропортах из-за ограничений по безопасности. 🟢В Ра…
Showing the 12 most recent of 396 posts we hold for @libertypeople. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@libertypeople edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 86 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LIBERTY PEOPLE” (@libertypeople), 97,317 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libertypeople.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.