Я – Мари Троицкая, архитектор-кондитер. Это самый большой блог про Францию в тг (с 2019).
Связь: Екатерина @krykingy
Книга про архитектуру Парижа
https://clck.ru/3GecJZ
Канал о моей жизни кондитера @marieoiseaupastry
РКН: https://clck.ru/3EhxCQ
Created
1 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 43 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,183–63,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:21
63,307
+59
15 Sept 2026, 17:17
63,248
-15
13 Sept 2026, 21:37
63,263
-12
12 Sept 2026, 02:58
63,275
-17
9 Sept 2026, 21:55
63,292
-29
6 Sept 2026, 12:16
63,321
+42
4 Sept 2026, 04:21
63,279
+70
2 Sept 2026, 19:58
63,209
-6
1 Sept 2026, 18:04
63,215
-1
31 Aug 2026, 21:37
63,216
-12
30 Aug 2026, 20:14
63,228
-16
29 Aug 2026, 20:32
63,244
-7
28 Aug 2026, 22:16
63,251
+6
28 Aug 2026, 01:17
63,245
-20
27 Aug 2026, 03:57
63,265
-7
26 Aug 2026, 07:28
63,272
-11
25 Aug 2026, 03:54
63,283
-12
23 Aug 2026, 22:48
63,295
-16
22 Aug 2026, 07:27
63,311
-15
20 Aug 2026, 19:27
63,326
first reading
Engagement
107 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 63,307 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,650
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 107 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
107 (2 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
458,700
Reactions total
17,301
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 02:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,960
Videos
≈605
Links
≈1,810
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 09s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28,924 reactions across 99 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15,955
55.2%
custom 5438334499828029496
5,678
19.6%
👍
5,169
17.9%
🕊
2,122
7.34%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 107 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marie_paris. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.935%
1 of 107 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
8,030
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
8,020
over 106 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJ7CTf7
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Где поесть вкусной французской кухни
Далеко не в каждом парижском рестике вкусно готовят, к этому добавляется отвратительный сервис… места знать надо, но тут вы точно влюбитесь в местную еду! ⬇️ #самовкусноевпариже
• Les Indécises
Нынешний хозяин с детства видел из окна квартиры это кафе и мечтал стать его владельцем. И стал! Бистро старой школы: стейк с пюре, вино и мусс о шоколя.
📍 2 Rue des Trois Bornes, 75011
…
Знаете, по чему я иногда ностальгирую в эмиграции? По «Вечернему Урганту» 🥺
Единственная передача, ради которой я включала телевизор. А потом, уже живя во Франции, смотрела выпуски на ютубе. Маленький ритуал: закончить дела, лечь с чаем и посмотреть Урганта. Эти полчаса всегда создавали ощущение, что день закончился хорошо 😍
И вот 25 октября наконец увижу всё это не по телику, а вживую! Иван с командой привозят в П…
Французы: Бог не создал нас для работы!
Часы работы кафешки в центре города: три дня в неделю с 13 до 18 и один день с 10 до трех… интересно, кто-то успевает туда ходить? 😜
Часто думаю, насколько ошибочное у нас с вами представление о французах. Особенно об их внешнем виде!
Вот этот бесконечный культ «французского стиля». Тысячи видео «как одеваются настоящие парижанки» или «5 секретов французского шика». И каждый раз не хочется вас расстраивать… но все эти невероятно стильные люди в рилзах составляют 0,001% населения. А половина из них иностранцы 😄
За 10 лет жизни здесь так и не прив…
Ничего необычного, просто парень на самокате с собакой между ног обгоняет машины со скоростью больше 90 км/ч на автотрассе под Парижем.
Собака явно живёт свою лучшую жизнь 😏И нет, это не ИИ. #профранцузов
Если вам кажется, что у вас дерьмовый день, подумайте о владельце этой квартиры: он попросил маляра перекрасить гостиную, а тот на всякий случай перекрасил ещё и фасад исторического здания 👌
Не знаю, как вы, но я за последние полгода отписалась от большинства каналов: всюду сплошные перепосты одних и тех же скучных новостей.
Оставила только редкие бриллианты – авторские каналы, которые ведут реально талантливые и острые авторы, способные формировать смыслы, трогать за душу или просто смешить.
НЕПРИНЦЕССА – одна из моих любимых.
Истории из жизни богатых и знаменитых или просто удивительных персонажей, …
Что нельзя делать в Париже, чтобы максимально насладиться поездкой❤️
• Самим выбирать столик в ресторане. Дождитесь официанта или менеджера. Сначала нужно представиться сотрудникам заведения. В провинции за самовольный выбор столика могут и выгнать!
• Пить кофе на открытой террасе. Он будет невкусным и дорогим. Воспользуйтесь моим списком 🥰
• Селиться возле Gare du Nord и выше на севере. И вообще не экономьте на ж…
Одна из самых странных кроватей (чего? 😐) Парижа находится в личной квартире Ле Корбюзье.
Архитектор сам придумал ее конструкцию и поднял на метр над полом. Зачем? Чтобы лёжа любоваться Булонским лесом поверх парапета балкона.
Сразу видно: у человека не было детей 😄 Как он с неё не падал и как забирался, не знаю… Мыть попу возле кровати тоже довольно экстравагантная затея! Но за всей этой абсурдностью была железная…
На днях провела несколько часов внутри чужого сказочного сна. L’Univers du Poète Ferrailleur – «Вселенную поэта из металлолома» – Робер Кудре создаёт 30 лет.
А началось всё с того, что однажды ему стало скучно и он начал строить маленькие домики. Потом появились башни, мосты, фонтаны, сады и десятки безумных механизмов из металла, дерева и найденных вещей. Так постепенно человек построил целый собственный мир.
Сам …
Париж – город мертвецов?
Под Парижем лежат останки более 6 миллионов человек. При этом в самом городе сегодня живёт всего 2 миллиона… То есть мёртвых в 3 раза больше, чем живых наверху.
И если Париж над землёй вы примерно представляете, то под ней – другая вселенная.
Кто-то приезжает сюда ради Эйфелевой башни. А любители трэша и адреналина знают, какой люк открыть посреди улицы и куда пролезть, чтобы попасть не в …
❤168custom 543833449982802949659👍35🕊21
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @marie_paris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@marie_paris edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@marie_paris named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@garderob_56 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tatiana_paris @tatiana_paris · 22,540 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Настоящая Франция @mme_perrier · 27,158 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
На Ссаных Матрасах @thedukeofjermuk · 24,832 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
to stay @hotostay · 52,151 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Елена Берковская @berkovskaya_elena · 77,926 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Визовый @vizoviy · 26,818 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
История одной картины @pic_history · 50,003 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
Наталья pro_knigi_kino @pro_knigi_kino · 36,545 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
поясни за ренессанс @chtozakartina · 21,652 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Bon Mot @lebonmot · 36,894 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
ПОНАЕХАВШАЯ @remote_russia · 37,578 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Изящное садоводство @gracefulgardens · 21,329 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Hopkins English @hopkinsenglish · 33,264 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Французский язык / Francais @le_francais_french · 43,689 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Доктор Афинская @liza_afinskaia · 71,170 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Real English. Таня Маркова @bk_gko · 44,716 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Аудиокурсы Langme @langme_ru · 38,063 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“А как там в Париже?🇫🇷” (@marie_paris), 63,307 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marie_paris.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.