Я/МЫ Грета Сукина! весь выпуск тут!
❤273custom 545390174623132562286🔥38custom 526937321800258020119custom 522650797980465873515💯7

Channel
@dukaliti
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
122,992subscribers
-408 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001096873512 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dukaliti |
| Description | Амбассадор немалого бизнеса Альфа-Банка. Канал Ксении Дукалис. Подмечаю, как мы летим в никуда, и вещаю про книги, кино, материнство, культуру и предпринимательство. Лимонады «Река» — это я😇 [email protected] Регистрация https://rknn.link/dgo |
| Created | 17 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dukaliti |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 122,992 | -40 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 123,032 | +20 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 123,012 | -42 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 123,054 | -23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 123,077 | -77 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 123,154 | -82 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 123,236 | -69 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 123,305 | -36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:28 | 123,341 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 123,355 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:26 | 123,365 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 123,387 | +21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 123,366 | +57 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 123,309 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 123,314 | +43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 123,271 | +100 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 123,171 | -52 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 123,223 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 123,217 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 123,221 | first reading |
99 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (1 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,621,880 |
| Reactions total | 74,128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 23:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
127,752 reactions across 90 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82,865 | 64.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9,748 | 7.63% | |
| custom 5453901746231325622 | 9,160 | 7.17% | |
| custom 5269478706694343963 | 5,077 | 3.97% | |
| 💯 | 4,767 | 3.73% | |
| custom 5269373218002580201 | 3,527 | 2.76% | |
| custom 5418228383525936942 | 3,477 | 2.72% | |
| custom 5283231140436523985 | 2,617 | 2.05% | |
| custom 5418248539807455434 | 2,324 | 1.82% | |
| ⚡ | 2,159 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5226507979804658735 | 1,917 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5422383077190025308 | 114 | 0.089% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138,530 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dukaliti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 99 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqxCa7kP | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGhjBEy | 1 | 18 August 2026 | 18 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Я/МЫ Грета Сукина! весь выпуск тут!
❤273custom 545390174623132562286🔥38custom 526937321800258020119custom 522650797980465873515💯7
21 сентября был Всемирный день борьбы с болезнью Альцгеймера Глупо, но я впервые узнала об этой болезни из кино: посмотрела «Дневник памяти» и ушла узнавать, что это за диагноз, испугалась и утешила себя, что это нескоро. Самым жестким киноопытом был «Отец». Во-первых, смотрела уже в достаточно взрослом возрасте и думала как о себе, так и родителях. Во-вторых, он очень реалистичный. Почти половина случаев деменции …
❤231custom 526947870669434396347🔥30custom 52832311404365239857💯3⚡1
Наблюдаю прям в последнее время женский бум в хорошем смысле: многие вещи переосмысляются, открываются и обсуждаются. Тут разговоры о том, что менструальная кровь, которую недалекие люди считают нечистой, содержит стволовые клетки; и новость о том, что сеть яичника (rete ovarii) была убрана мужиком из учебников анатомии, потому что он счел его бесполезным, но современная наука так не считает. Сериал Furious, о котор…
❤1,610custom 5453901746231325622555custom 5269478706694343963241custom 522650797980465873540🔥17custom 526937321800258020115custom 54182283835259369429
Без суфлера сегодня будет в режиме лайф — заходите на твич и вещаю в потоке https://www.twitch.tv/kdukalis/videos Старт через 10 минут
❤235custom 545390174623132562259🔥47custom 541822838352593694211
Предприниматели, которые работают с Китаем, это для вас. Альфа-Банк открыл набор на второй поток онлайн-курса «Альфа-Импортёры». Просто найти производителя в Китае легко, а вот найти хорошего, который не сорвёт сроки и будет окей в коммуникации, гораздо сложнее. Я в последний раз прибегала к помощи лучшего друга, который шьет одежду, чтобы заказать меховых зайцев. Очень муторная схема! А ведь еще есть сертификация,…
❤331🔥180💯109custom 54223830771900253084
УРАААА! Новый выпуск «обзор Луков звезд» с маэстро Роговым! Впервые говорю о соотечественниках, но делаем скидку: мотор сразу после дня рождения, я похмельная Грета Сукина 🐁 #YouTube #стиль
❤521custom 5453901746231325622110custom 541822838352593694264🔥30custom 526947870669434396313custom 52265079798046587356custom 52693732180025802011custom 54223830771900253081
Даже в отпуске кайфую от #клубДукалис Планирую вечером слушать клаб токс — девочки сами выбирают темы исходя из своего опыта и экспертизы 💅 А в октябре, посвященном теме родительства, экспертом будет Наталья Фомичева! Наконец будут ответы на вопросы, как бороться с ощущением беспомощности как родителя, как бороться со страхами и как говорить с детьми. Жду больше недели моды🙏
🔥268❤121custom 545390174623132562233
Редкий кулинарный пост У родителей дома стоит аэрогриль, я открыла для себя это изобретение богов. От печенья до котлет — ВСЕ В НЕМ. Бабушка с дедушкой забрали Гришу на прогулку, так что я наконец могу в одиночестве потупить в сериал и решила сделать себе перекус. Решила попробовать сделать в нем брюссельскую капусту и сейчас сижу в кайфе.В аэрогриле она получилась вообще не горькая, наоборот, хрустящие листики снар…
❤951custom 5453901746231325622145custom 526947870669434396392🔥26
Отпускной фотодамп в стиле кинкидук. Сгоняли в Италию и Словению, я играю в теннис и хожу в зал, Гриша плавает каждый день!!! Не зря в Москве ходим, виден результат🐰 Ощущаю, как становлюсь спокойнее. В среду сделаю на твиче утром без суфлера, сегодня проверяла связь 💅🏽 кто хотел без мейка и света, все для вас #путешествия
❤1,490custom 5453901746231325622293custom 5226507979804658735148custom 541822838352593694233🔥31custom 528323114043652398531⚡8💯2
Последний набор в клуб Дукалис! Когда в прошлом ноябре я придумала этот движ, мне было дико интересно и дико страшно: столько идей, людей и ответственности. В итоге благодаря участницам и участникам с каждым месяцем сообщество все круче. Последние месяцы посвящены родительству, публичным выступлениям и еще будет бонус месяц с той самой темой ✨🧜🏻♀️ 28-30 буду читать вступительные эссе, вносите в календарь. @kdukalis…
❤375⚡78custom 545390174623132562266🔥9custom 54182283835259369425custom 54223830771900253084custom 52693732180025802011
Наткнулась в тредс на видео, где несколько мужиков повалили буквально на землю женщину и пытаются у нее забрать дочь детсадовского возраста. Мать ребенка не отдает, в итоге ее отбили прохожие. Приписка к новости «подозревают, что это заказ бывшего мужа украсть ребенка». До этого видела у Иды Галич видео, что обнаружили отца, выкравшего детей. И везде находятся великие комментарии мужиков «ну значит мать такая, что не…
❤1,800💯868custom 5269478706694343963282custom 545390174623132562255custom 522650797980465873537🔥12⚡9custom 54182283835259369421
Новый «без суфлера»! В тиктоке уже хорошо отреагировали на мои рассуждения о том, как все вокруг стало сексуальным и горячим, но ни в чем нет чувственности, эротики и желания. В видео еще говорю о том, что красота перестала быть идеологичной и стала полностью цифровой. К слову, луксмаксинг самое последнее доказательство этого. А еще поминаем Глорию Стайнем и хайпим игры кочевников На следующей неделе без суфлера буд…
❤602custom 5453901746231325622163🔥101⚡10custom 54182283835259369429custom 52693732180025802017
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @dukaliti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@dukaliti edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 540 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“не тереби дао” (@dukaliti), 122,992 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dukaliti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.