Пишу про тренды, ношу Chanel вместе с aliexpress ❤️ И знаю, что будет модно через год.
📍Москва
По рекламе:
@Patrick_mgmt (Александр)
Регистрация в реестре РКН:
https://clck.ru/3Qop6p
Created
1 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188,405–190,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 03:01
188,661
-215
16 Sept 2026, 15:57
188,876
-170
14 Sept 2026, 18:56
189,046
-117
13 Sept 2026, 05:59
189,163
-41
11 Sept 2026, 10:17
189,204
-201
8 Sept 2026, 15:01
189,405
-161
5 Sept 2026, 10:39
189,566
-26
3 Sept 2026, 16:00
189,592
-31
2 Sept 2026, 06:07
189,623
-132
1 Sept 2026, 03:05
189,755
-52
31 Aug 2026, 01:04
189,807
-81
30 Aug 2026, 00:36
189,888
-93
28 Aug 2026, 22:43
189,981
-108
28 Aug 2026, 00:13
190,089
-117
27 Aug 2026, 03:34
190,206
-111
26 Aug 2026, 06:55
190,317
-15
25 Aug 2026, 04:14
190,332
-38
24 Aug 2026, 02:19
190,370
+118
22 Aug 2026, 07:47
190,252
+63
20 Aug 2026, 23:38
190,189
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 188,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,800
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
78 (4 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
1,384,790
Reactions total
23,281
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,700
Videos
≈564
Links
≈3,240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 04s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36,900 reactions across 75 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23,543
63.8%
🔥
5,395
14.6%
👍
1,612
4.37%
😁
1,368
3.71%
💘
1,342
3.64%
💔
1,278
3.46%
🥰
1,222
3.31%
😱
653
1.77%
🕊
487
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,334 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
11.5%
9 of 78 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
9
posts carrying an erid · 9 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
25,600
over 9 measured posts
Median views · rest
32,400
over 69 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcEbi6f
1
17 September 2026
17 September 2026
2SDnjccn8m1
1
29 August 2026
29 August 2026
2SDnjceizGB
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2SDnjeBpeMy
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2SDnjeMVZfq
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2SDnjeVSmEb
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2SDnjeVa8PD
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2SDnjeZsNYb
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2SDnjecshUo
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вдохновилась и в итоге только что купила себе вот эти футуристичные черные Nike Shox с первой фотки! По моему, выглядят сумасшедше круто, буду носить с леггинсами и черным пальто (умоляю, скажите, что я не сошла с ума и она правда классные, ахаха)
Взяла на Lamoda, потому что там до конца недели скидки до -30% именно на кроссовки (c 24 по 27 сентября). Ну и там они оригинальные, конечно, можно за это не переживать.
…
Случайно нашла фото с закрытого пресс-ревью Nike, где они показывают будущие модели своих кроссовок и просто посмотрите на это…
Я, почему-то, просто влюбилась в эти черные на каблуке 🖤 И ниндзя боты тоже классные. Надеюсь, они правда поступят в продажу!
Находки недели из новинок наших брендов. Ощущение, что месяц не заходила на сайты, в каждом бренде так много красоты!!
Но сегодня лайк отправляется вот чему:
⚪️ Милитари лонгслив Befree
⚪️ Вот здесь внимание - резиновые сапоги!!! Красивая форма, матовые, минималистичные, хватайте, пока есть. Оставлю ссылку на ЯМаркет (там чуть дешевле, но мало в наличии) и на сам Rendez-vous
⚪️ Симпатичный лонг с цветными рукавами и…
Сегодня утром мамуля ходила по пляжу, нашла песчаную лилию и принесла ее мне показать (и понюхать, аромат невероятный).
Примерно через секунду к нам подбежал официант и посоветовал срочно спрятать цветок, потому что он занесен в красную книгу и нас могут даже забрать в полицию за то, что мы его сорвали.
Через 15 минут мама пришла с перчатками и большим черным мусорным пакетом и сказала, что сегодня объявляет «день …
В этот раз загар ложится идеально, поэтому покажу, чем пользуюсь.
Дисклеймер. Загар вреден! Всегда лучше не загарать, сидеть в тени и пользоваться спф 50, никого не призываю повторять мои солнечные ванны.
Но если вы хотите загореть и не сгореть при этом, то расскажу, как у меня это получается.
1 фото - это то, что я наношу дома. На все тело и лицо Tan maximiser от comfort zone. Приятный легкий крем, никакой липкости…
Человек, помешанный на увлажнении (то есть я) несет вам новую увлажняющую находку.
Я вообще опытным путем выяснила, что одно только увлажнение может решить очень много проблем с кожей, особенно, если переборщить с сильными активами (кислоты, ретинолы и тд). Поэтому, увлажняющими сыворотками я пользуюсь всегда и часто пробую разные.
Эта сыворотка от DE_CODE классная, молочная и достаточно плотненькая, а не как водичк…
Общий сбор всех любителей красный кожаных штанишек!!!1!1! Limé тоже сшил нам такие.
Из плюсов - низкая талия и укороченная длина (а это значит, что подойдут невысоким и их не придется ушивать, как мои из LR). Мой корреспондент ака моя подружка уже примерила, говорит, что материал очень приятный и снаружи, и внутри, там будто начёсик.
Если есть на свете рай, это - турецкий олинклюзив.
Знаю, как многие недолюбливают такой отдых, но это единственное место, где я по настоящему отдыхаю. Читаю книжки, вкусно кушаю (вернусь пухлая и красивая) и ни о чем больше не думаю.
На мне костюм с Али, покупала вещи по отдельности, поэтому чуть отличается оттенок белого и материал. Ссылки оставляю, но цена для алиэкспресса неприятная: лонгслив (очень мягкий) и шор…
Игнорировала наши бренды очков, но в день отъезда резко захотелось новую оправу, пришлось срочно ехать.
Зашла в Cultura и PYE, первые - более классические и спокойные, а PYE более модные, их и взяла (хотелось добавить настроения обычным пляжным образам).
Модель Tuner vantablack, достаточно легкие и удобные, хоть выглядят и массивно. Еще и консультанты в магазине очень приятные ☺️
Платье Lavarice (ему уже 2 года), …
Скорее заходите посмотреть, кто вы на Lamoda! У них поменялась система лояльности. Теперь она намного понятнее и проще: чем больше ваша активность на Lamoda, тем интереснее привилегии вы получаете.
Всего 3 уровня: адепт стиля, мастер стиля и икона стиля.
Почему я все еще не икона стиля, вы меня извините?! Вы мой камербанд видели???
Адепт стиля получает скидку до 25% и персональный промокод на день рождения.
Мастер …
Абсолютно стоит того, чтобы ее везти ❤️
Обычно шляпы я только покупаю и никогда не ношу, но эта - прикольная, выглядит дерзко. Чувствую себя немного Беллочкой Хадид.
❤633🔥234👍68💘16🥰4😱3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @vrednayamoda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
didi_pro_ali @didi_pro_ali · 5 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 5 September 2026
Софи Балябина 🧚♀️ @balyabina_sofi · 46,830 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Marianna Eliseeva @mariannaeliseeva · 95,210 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
lenabalykina @lenabalykina · 44,494 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 28 August 2026
lamoda на связи @lamoda_na_svyazi · 44,508 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 27 August 2026
Veronika14 @veronika14 · 62,564 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
aim_clo @aimclo_telegram · 37,829 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
WYSH МОДА @wyshmoda · 36,471 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 September 2026
Ко-Ко-Ко (фэшн / стиль / мода) @kokokokakmodno · 41,061 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 29 August 2026
LEONTEVA MARIIA 💖 @leontevamariya_tg · 107,657 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 August 2026
STYLE BY ALENARESH @stylebyalenaresh · 59,733 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 22 August 2026
Anastasia_Parfenova @anastasia_parfenova_stylist · 31,113 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 6 September 2026
juliadamon @juliadamonn · 32,541 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
годнота на авито @godnotanaavito · 23,487 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
Мода в капсуле | Образы | Стиль | Тренды @shoppingfyou · 33,112 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 4 September 2026
Azalia L/ stylist @azalial · 42,554 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
Zimanzóne @zimanzone · 52,844 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
ШопагоLee @ShopahoLee · 44,262 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Дьявол носит H&M @devilwearshandm · 72,684 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
ZARINA @zarina_brand · 82,246 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 25 August 2026
eat.sleep.wear. @eatsleepwear · 88,116 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 August 2026
ШМОТ @zashmot · 107,318 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
развивая стиль | Лидия Шаро @sharovashare · 30,176 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
Diana Nonskaya @diananonskaya · 32,509 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 343 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода” (@vrednayamoda), 188,661 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vrednayamoda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.