Дорогой, тебе уже никто не поверит Для тех, кто не в курсе: Ченнинг Татум оставлял негативные комментарии про Зои Кравиц и Гарри Стайлса с фейкового аккаунта. Все мы с одного завода)))

Channel
ШМОТ
@zashmot
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
107,495subscribers
-986 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001344300300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zashmot |
| Description | Канал редактора моды, стилиста Алины Шкарупы (ex ELLE, Cosmo) @alinashkarupa Мое YouTube-шоу «Звездный гардероб»: https://youtube.com/@pro_shmot В реестре РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673754fb6afad41667bf2a5a®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 13 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zashmot |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 107,495 | -59 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 107,554 | -19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 107,573 | -46 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 107,619 | -71 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 107,690 | -85 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 107,775 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 107,798 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 107,799 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 107,800 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 107,787 | +55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 107,732 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 107,739 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 107,775 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 107,796 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 107,832 | -32 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 107,864 | -52 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 107,916 | -62 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 107,978 | -35 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 108,013 | -28 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 108,041 | first reading |
Engagement
146 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.8%
- avg views ÷ 107,495 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,300
- 93 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 94
- of 146 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 146 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,982,940 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈44,400
- Videos
- ≈1,640
- Links
- ≈1,390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10m 43s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.37%
- 2 of 146 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 20,100
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 20,800
- over 143 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjeBMRHm | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqvVLeg3 | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Зонтик с бисерной вышивкой — ааааа 💔
У Дэниела Ли, судя по всему, закончился депрессивный эпизод и он выдал очень достойную коллекцию Burberry. Дизайнер создавал её в коллаборации с Селией Биртвелл, легендарной британской художницей по текстилю. Ей, на минуточку, 85 лет! Вы могли видеть цветы ее авторства, например, в коллекциях Valentino 2015 года. Источником вдохновения для дуэта стал стиль 70-х, а также оттенки в работах покойного Дэвида Хокни. Хоче…
Хочу от и до этот лук Zivert из съемки для ЦУМа. Особенно блестящий топ Valentino! Стилизовала Ксюша Смо
Потрясная, конечно, съемка с Ксенией Собчак у Fashion Paper. Ибрагим — любовь!!
Самые перспективные российские молодые стилисты 2026 Каждый год я собираю список самых перспективных ребят. В этом году было особенно тяжело. В 2024 и 2025 в списке было по 18 человек, в этом набралось 9. В списке стилисты на разных этапах развития карьеры: есть те, кто с ноги ворвался в индустрию чуть больше года назад и уже делает большие проекты. Есть те, кто работает уже несколько лет, но за последние 12 месяц…
Что понравилось на показе Simone Rocha: всевозможные вариации прозрачной обуви и бисерные брови
У бренда A Letter случился дебютный показ на Неделе моды в Лондоне. Команда показала фирменные мятые платья, очень простые, и от этого очаровательные, брюки и рубашки, а также немного сумасшедшие очки с кораллами. Красиво!
Самый желанный мерч сезона — Dior со студией А24!
Самый модный магазин Москвы — Walk Of Shame. Поздравляю Андрея Артемова и команду! Невероятная красота. Встретила там ВООБЩЕ ВСЕХ
Гленн Мартенс в Diesel — всё. Ну и давно пора, если честно. Дизайнер сконцентрируется только на Maison Margiela
Кавергерл дня: Ирина Шейк для октябрьского номера Vogue Arabia 🚬
Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @zashmot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fashion_mur · 208,4875 postsArbiter elegantiae
@elegantiae_a · 43,1063 postsHYPENEWS
@hypenews · 23 postsФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,6122 postsНастроение фэшн
@ozzshow · 182 postsAURORE Fashion Brand
@Aurorebrand · 1711 postМиссТелеграм |
@Ms_krasota · 63,6141 postНата | Швейный нонконформизм
@NGGurskaya · 1461 postКукояка на связи♥️
@Panarinka · 77,5861 postБратья Барсуки
@PlyumChannel · 1981 postAESTHETIC LIFESTYLE
@aesthetics_daily · 401 postРаздаем стиль с Катей Акопян
@akopyanek · 2491 postANNADESIGN/АННА ДИЗАЙН
@annadesign_co · 751 postDaniil Antsiferov
@daniil_antsiferov · 2,0831 postdrama mama || драма мама
@drama0mama · 711 postФЕШН КОМА
@fashionkoma · 9761 post✨Fast Fashion✨|| Zara, Massimo Dutti и др. Доставка в РФ.
@fastfashionru · 1321 postГУЧЧИГЕНГ
@guccibangsta · 3121 postハートビート
@heartbreat2024 · 191 postIMAKEBAGS by Ksusha
@imakebags · 1,2391 postKAMILLA
@kamilla_hanapovaa · 2,0001 postKORKUNOVA
@korkunovadi · 15,3681 postMARINARIYS
@marinariyss · 10,5191 postМогу себе позволить
@mogupozvolit · 3891 postNOMOSTYLE
@nomorestyle · 4,0441 postОсобые вещи
@ov_homewear · 411 postPijmak
@pijmak · 2521 postКэрри Брэдшоу узбекского пиара
@prvbolshomgorode · 1,6361 postШопинг-терапия
@shopotherapy · 40,2501 postФорум "Сияние"
@sunshinechukotka · 361 postСвої люди
@svoi_lyudy · 51 postвремя сурка
@syr0k · 151 postМИША И КИТТИ
@zusammen_mode · 17,9771 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@sashaonline · 86,5264 postsMUR
@fashion_mur · 208,4873 postsшкомарова
@shkomarova · 17,2273 postsGolden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,4792 postsПеченюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,3942 postsМодные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,2802 postsКсения Чилингарова
@chilichoice · 7,7511 postCopy Me
@copyme · 26,8651 postFashion dnevnik
@fashiondnevnik · 26,4181 postTHE STYLE DIRECTOR
@ibragimgatsievv · 13,4951 postТоп за свои деньги (Sasha Bokova)
@kuplyuhochu · 15,0231 postОтдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 46,1261 postMarianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 95,2101 postSCOTEENA
@scoteena · 14,4361 postKSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,7181 postТаня Столяр
@tanyastlr · 7,2481 postМИША И КИТТИ
@zusammen_mode · 17,9771 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@lifestylewhat · 46,1263 postsКсения Соловьёва
@ksenia_solovieva · 52,0102 postsЖурнал «Москвичка»
@moskvichka_mag · 102,3982 postsMUR
@fashion_mur · 208,4871 postK-KOD | К-КОД
@k_kodex · 1631 postТоп за свои деньги (Sasha Bokova)
@kuplyuhochu · 15,0231 postЧе по стилю?
@marusia_stile · 24,2621 post🪆Matreshka_mood
@matreshkamood · 981 postNew cut
@newcut0 · 7311 postЯ не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,5261 postСписок Телеграмм Каналов
@SpisokTelegramKanalov · 461 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@dog_rose · 1,7081 postFamilia
@famila_offprice · 322,4821 postFASHION PAPER
@fashionpaper · 53,2331 postslepestok & fire annd air
@fireanndair · 9,8931 postФокус Мода
@focus_moda · 10,6551 postФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,6121 postТоп за свои деньги (Sasha Bokova)
@kuplyuhochu · 15,0231 postlamoda на связи
@lamoda_na_svyazi · 44,5081 postмурка московская
@mosmur · 16,9961 postПеченюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,3941 postшкомарова
@shkomarova · 17,2271 postМодные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,2801 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@sncmag · 301,518#1
@rogov24 · 189,541#2
@devilwearshandm · 72,684#3
@theblueprintru · 96,067#4
@myhotelki · 48,559#5
@strelets_molodec · 355,464#6
@styledbysmo · 38,718#7
@istominakarina · 157,537#8
@vrednayamoda · 188,661#9
@lifestylewhat · 46,126#10
@dukaliti · 123,032#11
@wearfeelings · 70,024#12
@sashaonline · 86,526#13
@copyme · 26,865#14
@burimovasasha · 81,553#15
@shkomarova · 17,227#16
@tdmood · 21,678#17
@dressedto · 41,678#18
@mamkina · 30,156#19
@ksbchk · 372,627#20
@zlayakiska · 73,280#21
@theosdnew · 47,490#22
@fashiondnevnik · 26,418#23
@mukhinss · 55,055#24
@straightface · 21,113#25
@editorsonvacation · 20,352#26
@goodmorningkarl · 56,190#27
@drunkfashion · 40,044#28
@superficialspacecadet · 24,701#29
@svintrovert · 84,110#30
@Viva_la_vika · 44,199#31
@shipilovaks · 46,907#32
@girl_who · 79,891#33
@aleko_n17 · 104,218#34
@ksenia_solovieva · 52,010#35
@azalial · 42,554#36
@bird_doesnt_doze · 24,103#37
@yagodnoelukoshko10 · 7,799#38
@shoesanddrinks · 27,042#39
@okarput · 30,665#40
@korolevatsvetaeva · 27,766#41
@mariemets · 23,398#42
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,809#43
@marinariyss · 10,519#44
@fashiontranzakciya · 12,594#45
@megastil · 13,467#46
@kosmetos · 15,696#47
@pinkbirkin · 13,881#48
@fashion_mur · 208,487#49
@goldchihuahua · 91,479#50
@spletni_tg · 187,774#51
@theblueprintnews · 72,402#52
@MinogarovaNews · 95,130#53
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#54
@bloodysx · 1,158,879#55
@omanko · 114,097#56
@goshakartsev · 88,841#57
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141#58
@meduzalive · 1,121,201#59
@pechenuwki · 34,394#60
@mash · 3,096,804#61
@svetskiekroshki · 79,850#62
@kureelka · 124,870#63
@tatlersheroine · 100,724#64
@ibragimgatsievv · 13,495#65
@moscowmap · 2,674,200#66
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005#67
@budnigalliano · 27,853#68
@theblueprintcareer · 141,233#69
@religion_vogue · 25,744#70
@LIVfashionmag · 203,725#71
@Peopletalkru · 182,678#72
@kontext_channel · 838,100#73
@thynk · 70,798#74
@oksanarim1 · 36,100#75
@rogov_news · 31,060#76
@sale_caviar · 192,936#77
@naumita · 60,091#78
@kseniadenisovna · 33,821#79
@Buro247_ru · 25,677#80
@imnotbozhena · 504,326#81
@beautyzz · 18,434#82
@olga_shuranova · 48,862#83
@limestorecom · 93,482#84
@moskvichka_mag · 102,398#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wfcru · 26,198
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
@devilwearshandm · 72,684
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@ShopahoLee · 44,464
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@myhotelki · 48,559
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@rogov24 · 189,541
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@anitagloss · 26,753
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 September 2026
@mamkina · 30,156
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@dressedto · 41,678
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@zlayakiska · 73,280
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
@ilincognitio · 29,404
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
@theblueprintru · 96,067
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@salavat_kypere · 46,539
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
@okarput · 30,665
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@drunkfashion · 40,044
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@lamoda_na_svyazi · 44,508
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 27 August 2026
@fashionpaper · 53,233
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@wearfeelings · 70,024
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@goodmorningkarl · 56,190
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@aleko_n17 · 104,218
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@vrednayamoda · 188,661
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@olga_shuranova · 48,862
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
@hacking_fashion · 33,556
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@EvelinaFashionSchool · 82,588
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
@olgakrayzman · 25,821
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 159 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШМОТ” (@zashmot), 107,495 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zashmot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.