Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МИША И КИТТИ

Channel

МИША И КИТТИ

@zusammen_mode

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,730subscribers

+2,180 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768545740
TypeChannel
Username@zusammen_mode
DescriptionКанал стилистов Миши и Китти 🖤 о моде, нашей жизни и работе. Сотрудничество @veronika_pr_misha_kitty РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68d52be942f365751e1c8552
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zusammen_mode

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,52319,73418,628.519,7307 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net +2,180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,191–20,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 07:0919,730-1
6 Nov 2026, 08:5019,731-3
5 Nov 2026, 07:3919,734+2
4 Nov 2026, 05:2719,732+5
3 Nov 2026, 07:4519,727-1
2 Nov 2026, 07:3019,728+4
1 Nov 2026, 08:4519,724+7
31 Oct 2026, 09:2119,717-2
30 Oct 2026, 11:3519,719+23
29 Oct 2026, 08:4819,696+6
28 Oct 2026, 05:3719,690+29
27 Oct 2026, 02:1719,661+87
26 Oct 2026, 03:5119,574+44
25 Oct 2026, 06:3419,530+551
24 Oct 2026, 09:0618,979+21
23 Oct 2026, 12:0818,958+5
22 Oct 2026, 14:2118,953+28
21 Oct 2026, 07:5618,925+12
20 Oct 2026, 07:0118,913+14
19 Oct 2026, 07:4918,899first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 19,730 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,580
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held57 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total28,350
Reactions total818
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,320
Videos
≈360
Links
≈423

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,156 reactions across 56 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,33456.2%
🔥1,35132.5%
🍾3708.90%
💯1012.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 56 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zusammen_mode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC≈2,040 views48 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Про ИИ-скандал Dior писать не будем, просто наблюдаем со стороны 🤭 давайте лучше обсудим стиль архитектора Питера Марино, который получил Fashion Icon на церемонии CFDA Fashion Awards. И если вы хоть раз видели его фотографии, вопросов к выбору победителя возникнуть не должно!) «До сегодняшнего вечера я думал, что мой гардероб ценят только в определенных клубах после полуночи», — сказал он на вручении премии Черна…

🔥29🍾7💯7❤5

6 Nov 2026, 09:10 UTC≈2,560 views78 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

П.С.: особенно нравится, что Мартин на фото в Comme des Garçons AW2012 💕 Этому человеку смело можно доверить модный дом, ну наша.

🔥41❤37

6 Nov 2026, 07:58 UTC≈2,610 views164 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @km20conceptstorePhoto

⚡️ Мартин Роуз — новый креативный директор Balenciaga Она приступит к работе уже 16 ноября. За 109-летнюю историю дома Balenciaga его впервые возглавит женщина.

❤101🔥52🍾11

5 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,780 views39 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня выбираем пушистика для себя и своей второй половинки! • Тонкий шарф из искусственного меха Ushatava • Шарф из искусственного меха 2mood • Молочный шарф из овчины Idol • Шапка-йети из искусственного меха Love Republic • Повязка из искусственного меха Zarina • Шапка Emka • Пелерина 1811 • Капхолдер для стаканчика Tendance☕ • Варежки Ekonika Ну а какой брать: искусственный или натуральный— решать тольк…

❤24🔥8🍾4💯3

5 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC≈2,300 views76 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Честно говоря, обожаю рекламные кампании Chanel при Блази. Безупречно. Фото Alec Soth (даже со ссылкой на одну из любимейших картинок его авторства)

❤48🔥28

4 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC≈2,310 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В 1997 году Aphex Twin купил в Лондоне здание бывшего банка, переехал туда и устроил музыкальную студию. Все потому, что соседи постоянно жаловались на громкую музыку, а в здании банка имелись два огромных хранилища со стенами толщиной больше метра. Пятиэтажное здание находилось в районе Elephant & Castle. Прохожие еще долго принимали здание за действующий банк и заходили открыть счет. Вместо сотрудников за стойкой …

❤39🔥12🍾7

3 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC≈2,500 views45 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Пока все ждут очередной перестановки в модной индустрии и официального объявления о назначении Мартин Роуз в Balenciaga, предлагаем заглянуть в наши архивы вещей Martine Rose. Если слухи подтвердятся, с нагрузкой в 6–7 коллекций в год, ей, возможно, придется поставить собственную марку на паузу. Так уже поступил Дюран Лантинк после назначения в Jean Paul Gaultier, а Джонатан Андерсон полностью пересмотрел формат JW …

❤34🔥8💯3

2 Nov 2026, 15:16 UTC≈2,560 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Для своей новой выставки «Fabric Matrons» Синди Шерман получила полный доступ к архиву тканей Chanel и творческую свободу, чтобы использовать их в своих новых фотографических работах. Шерман создала целую галерею вымышленных персонажей, через которых исследует темы идентичности, женственности, красоты и общественного давления, с которым сталкиваются женщины по мере старения. Выставка «Fabric Matrons» проходит в лон…

❤32🔥18🍾5

1 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC≈3,170 views146 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

В честь выписки из больницы сегодня смотрим любимый фильм Китти «Шоугелз» (1995) Пола Верховена в рубрике #воскресноевидео. Лас-Вегас, Кайл Маклахлен, Элизабет Беркли, костюмы, декорации — в кадре красиво все. Но за блеском, деньгами и роскошной жизнью скрывается мир интриг, зависти и предательства. Пытаясь пробиться на вершину, главная героиня постепенно сама становится похожа на людей, которых еще недавно презирал…

🔥81❤49🍾15💯1

1 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈3,380 views97 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Dry Clean Only Архивная съемка i-D 2004 года Фото by Bianca Pilet Стиль by Kanako B Koga

❤65🔥21🍾9💯2

2 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,470 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В #вишлистМиши уже много лет эта лимитированная сумка Гектор из меха нутрии. Найдите где — присылайте ссылку! Дедушка разводил раньше нутрий — они у нас шли на мясо и шубы, такая ностальгия…

❤32🔥22💯7

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @zusammen_mode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

suharevstyle
@suharevstyle · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
SALAVAT KYPERE
@salavat_kypere · 46,365
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
OLGA SHU
@olga_shuranova · 46,466
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МИША И КИТТИ” (@zusammen_mode), 19,730 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zusammen_mode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.