Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SALAVAT KYPERE

Channel

SALAVAT KYPERE

@salavat_kypere

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

46,579subscribers

+410 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001304914141
TypeChannel
Username@salavat_kypere
DescriptionПо вопросам сотрудничества писать сюда: [email protected] @breakdownthewalls Канал в реестре Роскомнадзора: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=672e3922ee419e45414e42ba&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created29 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salavat_kypere

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

46,16946,57946,3746 August 2026 — 46,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,226 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,237 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,233 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,239 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,243 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,252 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,230 subscribers14 August 2026 — 46,217 subscribers15 August 2026 — 46,215 subscribers17 August 2026 — 46,197 subscribers19 August 2026 — 46,194 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,185 subscribers21 August 2026 — 46,184 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46,175 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,185 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,182 subscribers26 August 2026 — 46,200 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,201 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,192 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,194 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,207 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,194 subscribers2 September 2026 — 46,202 subscribers3 September 2026 — 46,213 subscribers5 September 2026 — 46,204 subscribers8 September 2026 — 46,321 subscribers11 September 2026 — 46,320 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46,349 subscribers14 September 2026 — 46,345 subscribers16 September 2026 — 46,525 subscribers18 September 2026 — 46,539 subscribers25 September 2026 — 46,579 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +410. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,108–46,641 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 05:2146,579+40
18 Sept 2026, 22:3646,539+14
16 Sept 2026, 15:0146,525+180
14 Sept 2026, 18:5446,345-4
13 Sept 2026, 01:5646,349+29
11 Sept 2026, 05:5846,320-1
8 Sept 2026, 12:5646,321+117
5 Sept 2026, 06:3746,204-9
3 Sept 2026, 09:2846,213+11
2 Sept 2026, 03:0546,202+8
1 Sept 2026, 03:3946,194-13
30 Aug 2026, 03:0746,207+13
29 Aug 2026, 04:0846,194+2
28 Aug 2026, 00:3446,192-9
27 Aug 2026, 02:0746,201+1
26 Aug 2026, 05:0346,200+18
25 Aug 2026, 08:1846,182-3
24 Aug 2026, 05:1446,185+10
22 Aug 2026, 10:1746,175-9
21 Aug 2026, 02:5646,184first reading

Engagement

128 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.2%
avg views ÷ 46,579 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,700
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 128 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held128 (4 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total746,630
Reactions total38,562
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 05:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,200
Videos
≈867
Links
≈854

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 33s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

77,647 reactions across 124 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤45,07558.1%
❤‍🔥6,5888.48%
🔥5,2686.78%
👀2,6113.36%
🥰2,4753.19%
🎄2,3142.98%
💯2,2692.92%
😍2,1872.82%
⚡2,0652.66%
✍1,9852.56%
👨‍💻1,8652.40%
💋9551.23%
🤩4500.58%
🤗3360.433%
👍2480.319%
🍓2440.314%
🙏2300.296%
👏1320.17%
🎉1030.133%
🏆950.122%
3 further kinds1520.196%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,338 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
168
across the posts below
Posts paid on
77
of 126 we hold a reading for · 61%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @salavat_kypere. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 128 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC≈12,700 views1,109 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

Для Авроры 😭❤️

❤782😍187🔥104❤‍🔥18🥰18

24 Sept 2026, 19:54 UTC≈15,700 views1,270 reactions5 Starsread 27 September 2026

Я приехала в Париж, а мой багаж нет Я в ахуе

👀971🎄147❤117💋18👨‍💻17

24 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC≈19,800 views986 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Не понимаю, а зачем неделя моды в Москве в этом году в те же даты, что и Парижская? На зло западу? Или же все таки на зло русским брендам?) В недоумении, впрочем как и всегда.

❤592💯214🤗107👀56⚡17

23 Sept 2026, 06:18 UTC≈16,700 views406 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Смотрела, смотрела вчера на показ и думаю, почему меня не трогает НИЧЕГО, а потом поняла, что Миучи любит юбки, а я нет. Поэтому мужская Prada мне больше заходит, но, конечно, расшитая юбка на показе была прекрасна!

❤336💯43👨‍💻23🎄2👀2

23 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC≈15,700 views413 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Prada

❤300🔥84⚡21👀7👨‍💻1

22 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC≈15,600 views513 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Потому что передачи с тнтшными мордами смотреть невозможно.

❤275💯206✍24👨‍💻5🎄3

21 Sept 2026, 20:07 UTC≈16,200 views432 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Сходили в новое пространство ШКАФ бренда Синий Всадник. Очень мне понравились ребята и вот за такие российские бренды, как они - не стыдно. Обязательно посетите пространство, очень камерно и концептуально, люблю такое. Фотки забыла сделать; поэтому вам сюда тоже видео залью. Забрала себе кейп, костюм и бриджи. Жду, когда появится парка.

❤315🔥79😍33👨‍💻3🎄2

21 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC≈11,300 views432 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Тильда ❤️

😍275❤111🔥40❤‍🔥6

20 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC≈11,700 views516 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Хахахах, спасибо чату джипити за помощь. Иначе бы мои текста выглядели, как язвительный наезд

❤363🤩94👀48💯6🙏5

20 Sept 2026, 08:12 UTC≈12,000 views1,113 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Ну я очень радуюсь тому, как мое тело отвечает на спорт. Мне нравится видеть результат именно от тренировок: не за пару недель, не каким-то волшебным быстрым способом, а постепенно, когда ты просто продолжаешь заниматься и однажды замечаешь, как сильно изменилось твое тело. Я не сушеная, и, честно, рада, что не поддалась всеобщему тренду на такую эстетику и погоню за максимально быстрым результатом. Мне вообще кажетс…

❤803🔥200👏76❤‍🔥18💯16

19 Sept 2026, 13:53 UTC≈11,700 views567 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤281🔥191❤‍🔥82👨‍💻7🎄6

19 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈12,100 views528 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Снимаю 4-ый день 😅 2 съемки с Сивковой и 2 съемки с Абдуллой Давно я так не упарывалась

❤371🔥85😍67🎄3👨‍💻2

Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @salavat_kypere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,655
#1
ПОЗАВЧЕРАШНИЕ НОВОСТИ/МАША МИНОГАРОВА😎
@MinogarovaNews · 95,041
#2
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 189,279
#3
MUR
@fashion_mur · 208,487
#4
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,409
#5
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,646
#6
шкомарова
@shkomarova · 17,227
#7
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 113,987
#8
mironovanastasiia
@mironovanastasiia · 150,240
#9
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 157,220
#10
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339
#11
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 107,318
#12
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 122,992
#13
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,402
#14
THE STYLE DIRECTOR
@ibragimgatsievv · 13,495
#15
Olga Karput 🥬
@okarput · 30,682
#16
Печенюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,394
#17
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,178,521
#18
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630
#19
OLGA SHU
@olga_shuranova · 49,773
#20
Дьявол носит H&M
@devilwearshandm · 72,543
#21
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,067
#22
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,122,482
#23
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336
#24
Отдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 46,089
#25
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,506
#26
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,952
#27
КК
@petrovtel · 525,264
#28
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,978
#29
фэшн транзакция
@fashiontranzakciya · 12,597
#30
Kseniya Shipilova
@shipilovaks · 46,907
#31
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#32
ROGOV.NEWS
@rogov_news · 31,010
#33
Обсессия
@obsessiiia · 4,871
#34
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,584
#35
Sasha Burimova
@burimovasasha · 81,553
#36
KOSTI
@kosti · 560,192
#37
Арюночка Daily💖
@aryunatardis · 2,614
#38
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 354,527
#39
И хочется, и колется
@hochetsakoletsa · 4,956
#40
Vitalii Akimov
@vitali_akimov · 4,896
#41
SCOTEENA
@scoteena · 14,409
#42
fashionable
@fashionab1ee · 6,012
#43
саша теслонд @teslond
@teslond1 · 96,283
#44
9mice
@the9mice · 276,475
#45
Глашатай
@glashagurianova · 4,347
#46
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,698
#47
philosophy di sofiya burnasheva
@dress4success · 5,293
#48
Ö News
@omanko_news · 47,826
#49
Lumpen Papers
@lumpenpapers · 6,370
#50
МИША И КИТТИ
@zusammen_mode · 18,107
#51
V I V A L A V I K A
@Viva_la_vika · 43,915
#52
Рената Литвинова
@renatalitvinova · 87,163
#53
Утя
@leshadomaa · 2,739
#54
Marianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 95,102
#55
Мамкина модница
@mamkina · 30,134
#56
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода
@vrednayamoda · 188,094
#57
martinchiks
@martinchiks · 6,508
#58
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 84,226
#59
Лавриченко
@pasexpert · 4,803
#60
Copy Me
@copyme · 26,865
#61
ФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,784
#62
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 141,233
#63
༺restyosoul༻
@restyosoul · 3,492
#64

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

OLGA SHU
@olga_shuranova · 49,773
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
ФРОНТ РОУ
@frontroww · 45,784
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
Отдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 46,089
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SALAVAT KYPERE” (@salavat_kypere), 46,579 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salavat_kypere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.