Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Poison Drop

Channel

Poison Drop

@impoisoned

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

53,699subscribers

-1,976 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001350848773
TypeChannel
Username@impoisoned
Descriptionунивермаг украшений Poison Drop задать вопрос – @PoisonHelpBot проголосовать за канал: https://t.me/boost/impoisoned сайт: https://bit.ly/3GFcGFL реферальная программа: http://bit.ly/3I4pdZn регистрация в реестре РКН: https://clck.ru/3NRDYY
Created22 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/impoisoned

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

53,69955,75254,725.56 August 2026 — 55,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 55,675 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,752 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,612 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,350 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,133 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,940 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,811 subscribers13 August 2026 — 54,722 subscribers14 August 2026 — 54,990 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55,131 subscribers17 August 2026 — 55,138 subscribers18 August 2026 — 55,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 55,064 subscribers20 August 2026 — 55,030 subscribers21 August 2026 — 55,022 subscribers23 August 2026 — 54,969 subscribers24 August 2026 — 54,889 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,842 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,850 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55,150 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55,205 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,971 subscribers30 August 2026 — 54,795 subscribers31 August 2026 — 54,580 subscribers1 September 2026 — 54,494 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,427 subscribers4 September 2026 — 54,330 subscribers7 September 2026 — 54,172 subscribers10 September 2026 — 53,999 subscribers12 September 2026 — 53,915 subscribers14 September 2026 — 53,868 subscribers15 September 2026 — 53,791 subscribers17 September 2026 — 53,699 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,976. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,391–56,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:0053,699-92
15 Sept 2026, 19:0053,791-77
14 Sept 2026, 06:1553,868-47
12 Sept 2026, 16:2253,915-84
10 Sept 2026, 13:4053,999-173
7 Sept 2026, 09:2054,172-158
4 Sept 2026, 16:0054,330-97
3 Sept 2026, 00:3654,427-67
1 Sept 2026, 20:0954,494-86
31 Aug 2026, 23:1854,580-215
30 Aug 2026, 22:3454,795-176
29 Aug 2026, 22:1354,971-234
28 Aug 2026, 22:4555,205+55
28 Aug 2026, 00:5455,150+300
26 Aug 2026, 21:5554,850+8
25 Aug 2026, 21:3454,842-47
24 Aug 2026, 22:1454,889-80
23 Aug 2026, 07:4554,969-53
21 Aug 2026, 18:4755,022-8
20 Aug 2026, 17:3355,030first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.24%
avg views ÷ 53,699 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,420
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held80 (30 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total181,410
Reactions total4,524
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,030
Videos
1,510
Links
2,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 09s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,197 reactions across 74 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,29435.8%
custom 54516769188122773862,35125.6%
custom 54359002455086496741,48816.2%
custom 54541761903465868126907.50%
custom 54021009058834882323583.89%
😁2682.91%
custom 54340347264636311761952.12%
custom 54721648748868466991922.09%
💅1751.90%
custom 5424885441100782420820.892%
💔710.772%
😎330.359%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,560 views44 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Брр, замерзли? С выбором пальто не поможем, но подскажем, как разнообразить осенний гардероб с помощью украшений. ❤️ / 💔 ?

22custom 543590024550864967415custom 54516769188122773867

20 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC≈2,660 views49 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54516769188122773862210custom 540210090588348823210custom 54340347264636311765😎2

19 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈2,740 views61 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

#GPWM с Викторией Шеляговой Учимся у Виктории не отказывать себе в удовольствии (читайте как «выбирать самое дорогое колье»), а у ее стилиста Салавата Шарипова – как стилизовать украшения. Какой сет лучше? 🖤 – готика с доспехами 🤍 – платье с тем самым колье

custom 545417619034658681232custom 54516769188122773861510custom 54359002455086496744

18 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,860 views95 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Если добавили на доску желаний пункт «стать такой же музой, чтобы в мою честь назвали огранку», понимаем на 100%. И идем к следующему вопросу: Чем больше граней у камня, тем больше он кажется. (Ответ в комментариях) ❤️ – правда 🖤 – ложь

custom 54516769188122773866030custom 54359002455086496745

18 Sept 2026, 12:46 UTC≈2,900 views32 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Poll

Огранка «маркиз» названа в честь улыбки…

  1. Маркизы де Помпадур80%
  2. Маркиза де Сада20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁169custom 54021009058834882327

18 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,870 views106 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Правильный ответ – изумруд. А вообще в ювелирном деле существует более 200 огранок. Проверите свои знания о них? Первой была огранка… (Ответ в комментариях) 🤍 – роза 🖤 – кабошон

custom 545167691881227738682custom 5454176190346586812186

18 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,920 views207 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

Редкая, но любимая рубрика – ювелирный квиз. Угадаете, как называется такая огранка? ✨– радиант 💅– принцесса 💍– изумруд

custom 5402100905883488232132custom 547216487488684669946💅29

17 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,130 views74 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

new in: Isabel Marant Недосказанность, french touch и бохо-шик – украшения культового бренда Isabel Marant выглядят так, будто были найдены в винтажной лавке. А среди наших новинок оказались по одной случайной романтичной истории, как в кино 00-х.

33custom 545167691881227738624custom 543590024550864967413😁3custom 54721648748868466991

15 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,560 views42 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Подробнее о стилизации украшений расскажем на стайлинг-сессии. Уже в эту субботу – обсудим с нашим реферальным стилистом, как выбирать и носить украшения так, чтобы они отражали ваш персональный стиль. А если захотите пополнить свою шкатулку, мы начислим двойные баллы (1 балл = 1 рубль). 19 сентября, 12:00 Poison Drop на Патриарших

custom 545167691881227738620custom 543590024550864967412custom 543403472646363117673

15 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,360 views112 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Простой (или не очень) способ разбавить осенние образы при помощи украшений. Какой прием возьмете на заметку? 🤌 – броши на воротник 🖤 – украшения вместо запонок 💔 – ни то, ни другое…

custom 543590024550864967451custom 54516769188122773863914💔7😁1

14 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,650 views115 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

настроение: понедельник

58💅34custom 543590024550864967414😎6😁3

12 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC≈4,140 views91 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Все и сразу! Роза отсылает к картине Сальвадора Дали «Медитативная роза», Маленькому принцу Экзюпери, роману Умберто Эко и татуировке самого Алана. В розе дизайнер нашел символы чувственности, силы и преодоления трудностей. А мы нашли ее среди новинок – теперь в размере XL.

56custom 543590024550864967416custom 545167691881227738614💔5

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @impoisoned. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Sept 2026, 12:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz410 voters

Огранка «маркиз» названа в честь улыбки…

  1. Маркизы де Помпадур80%
  2. Маркиза де Сада20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Poison Drop” (@impoisoned), 53,699 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impoisoned.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.